Triadic treatment decision-making in advanced cancer: a pilot study of the roles and perceptions of patients, caregivers, and oncologists
The research on cancer treatment decision-making focuses on dyads; the full “triad” of patients, oncologists, and caregivers remains largely unstudied. We investigated how all members of this triad perceive and experience decisions related to treatment for advanced cancer.
At an academic cancer center, we enrolled adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal or hematological malignancies, their caregivers, and their oncologists. Triad members completed a semi-structured qualitative interview and a survey measuring decisional conflict and perceived influence of the other triad members on treatment decisions.
Seventeen patients, 14 caregivers, and 10 oncologists completed the study. Patients and caregivers reported little decisional regret and voiced high satisfaction with their decisions, but levels of decisional conflict were high. We found sizeable disagreement among triad members’ perceptions and preferences. For example, patients and oncologists disagreed about the caregiver’s influence on the decision 56% of the time. In addition, many patients and caregivers preferred to defer to their oncologist about treatment decisions, felt like no true decision existed, and disagreed with their oncologist about how many treatment options had been presented.
Patients, caregivers, and oncologists have discordant perceptions of the cancer treatment decision-making process, and bring different preferences about how they want to make decisions. These data suggest that oncologists should assess patients’ and caregivers’ decisional preferences, explicitly signal that a decision needs to be made whenever approaching an important crossroads in treatment and ensure that patients and caregivers understand the full range of presented options.
KeywordsAdvanced cancer Treatment decisions Triadic decision-making
- 1.Jansen SJ, Otten W, van de Velde CJ, Nortier JW, Stiggelbout AM (2004) The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life. Br J Cancer 91(1):56–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601903 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hotta K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Yoshioka H, Hayashi H, Fukuyama H, Nishiyama A, Yokoyama T, Kuyama S, Umemura S, Kato Y, Nogami N, Segawa Y, Yasugi M, Tabata M, Tanimoto M (2010) Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: lung cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians' perceptions: results from Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0705. J Thorac Oncol 5(10):1668–1672. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f1c8cb CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Pardon K, Deschepper R, Stichele RV, Bernheim JL, Mortier F, Bossuyt N, Schallier D, Germonpre P, Galdermans D, Van Kerckhoven W, Deliens L, Consortium E (2010) Preferences of patients with advanced lung cancer regarding the involvement of family and others in medical decision-making. J Palliat Med 13(10):1199–1203. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0100 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Butow PN, Price MA, Bell ML, Webb PM, deFazio A, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study G, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Quality Of Life Study I, Friedlander M (2014) Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: a longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs. Gynecol Oncol 132(3):690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, Mack JW, Trice E, Balboni T, Mitchell SL, Jackson VA, Block SD, Maciejewski PK, Prigerson HG (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 300(14):1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27(10):1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar