Perceived barriers and preferred components for physical activity interventions in African-American survivors of breast or endometrial cancer with type 2 diabetes: the S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework
- 517 Downloads
African-American (AA) female cancer survivors share a disproportionate burden of diabetes compared to their white counterparts. Our objectives were to explore the perspectives of AA survivors with type 2 diabetes on perceived barriers to physical activity (PA) and preferences for a PA intervention and develop a framework for a PA program after cancer treatment.
Trained interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews with AA survivors of breast or endometrial cancer with diabetes (total n = 20; 16 breast, 4 endometrial). Thirteen open-ended questions were posed to stimulate discussions, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently reviewed transcriptions and extracted coded quotations to identify major themes.
Median age of participants was 63 years. Nine themes were identified that focused on post-treatment physical symptoms (e.g., lymphedema, bone/joint pain, depression symptoms and self-motivation as barriers to PA, exercise routines tailored to physical limitations and peer partners and program leaders who understand their emotional health needs). The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework summarizes the survivors’ preferences for an effective lifestyle intervention: Support efforts to maintain PA, Understand physical and depression symptoms, Collaborate with multi-disciplinary provider, Coordinate in-person intervention activities, Encourage partnerships among survivors for comorbidity risk reduction, develop Sustainable coping strategies for side effects of treatment, and Share local community resources.
Survivors verbalized the need for a multi-disciplinary team to assist with their psychosocial needs and physical limitations to achieve their PA goals, as integrated into the S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework.
Implications for cancer survivors
The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework reflects the perspectives of survivors with type 2 diabetes and may help to inform post-treatment programs.
KeywordsAfrican American women Cancer survivors Type 2 diabetes Physical activity Breast cancer Endometrial cancer
Compliance with ethical standards
Dr. Nicholson was funded in part by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK P30DK093002) and the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (1P50H502341801).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (#15-0162) approved the study.
Written or verbal informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2013) Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief:1–8Google Scholar
- 4.Beckles GLA, Thompson-Reid PE. Diabetes and women’s health across the life stages: a public health perspective. Atlanta, GA; 2001Google Scholar
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data and statistics: physical activity. 2010Google Scholar
- 10.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2016. Atlanta, GA; 2016Google Scholar
- 20.Carolina Data Warehouse for Health (CDW-H); University of North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute. https://tracs.unc.edu/index.php/services/biomedical-informatics/cdw-h. Accessed 28 July 2017
- 21.The UNC Health registry/cancer survivorship cohort https://tracs.unc.edu/index.php/services/biomedical-informatics/cdw-h (last accessed January 2 2017). No title
- 22.Miles MBM, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- 23.Strauss AL, Corbin JM (2007) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar