Designing more engaging computer-tailored physical activity behaviour change interventions for breast cancer survivors: lessons from the iMove More for Life study
Participating in regular physical activity is a recommended cancer recovery strategy for breast cancer survivors. However, tailored support services are not widely available and most survivors are insufficiently active to obtain health benefits. Delivering tailored programs via the Internet offers one promising approach. However, recent evaluations of such programs suggest that major improvements are needed to ensure programs meet the needs of users and are delivered in an engaging way. Understanding participants’ experiences with current programs can help to inform the next generation of systems.
The purposes of this study are to explore breast cancer survivor’s perspectives of and experiences using a novel computer-tailored intervention and to describe recommendations for future iterations.
Qualitative data from a sub-sample of iMove More for Life study participants were analysed thematically to identify key themes. Participants long-term goals for participating in the program were explored by analysing open-ended data extracted from action plans completed during the intervention (n = 370). Participants negative and positive perceptions of the website and recommendations for improvement were explored using data extracted from open-ended survey items collected at the immediate intervention follow-up (n = 156).
The majority of participants reported multi-faceted goals, consisting of two or more outcomes they hoped to achieve within a year. While clear themes were identified (e.g. ‘being satisfied with body weight’), there was considerable variability in the scope of the goal (e.g. desired weight loss ranged from 2 to 30 kg). Participants’ perceptions of the website were mixed, but clear indications were provided of how intervention content and structure could be improved.
This study provides insight into how to better accommodate breast cancer survivors in the future and ultimately design more engaging computer-tailored interventions.
KeywordsBreast cancer survivor Computer tailor Intervention Physical activity Qualitative
CES is supported by an Early Career Fellowship (ID 1090517) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. ALR is supported by an Early Career Fellowship (ID1105926) from the National Health Medical Research Council. KSC is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program. CV is supported by a Future Leader Fellowship from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (ID 100427). MJD is supported by a Future Leader Fellowship (ID 100029) from the National Heart Foundation of Australia. RCP is supported by a Senior Research Fellowship Award from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. The authors would like to thank BCNA and Register4 for their assistance recruiting participants, as well as the breast cancer survivors that volunteered their time and perspectives to help us evaluate and hopefully improve the platform.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethics approval was obtained from the Central Queensland University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00158).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Fong D, Ho J, Hui B, Lee A, Macfarlane D, Leung S, Cerin E, Chan W, Leung I, Lam S, Taylor A, Cheng K (2012) Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal:344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e70
- 4.Battaglini CL, Mills RC, Phillips BL, Lee JT, Story CE, Nascimento MGB, Hackney AC (2014) Twenty-five years of research on the effects of exercise training in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 5(2):177–190. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.177 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T (2012) Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians:n/a-n/a. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142
- 7.Schmitz K, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL, American College of Sports Medicine (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(7):1409–1426. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bluethmann SM, Basen-Engquist K, Vernon SW, Cox M, Gabriel KP, Stansberry SA, Carmack CL, Blalock JA, Demark-Wahnefried W (2015) Grasping the ‘teachable moment’: time since diagnosis, symptom burden and health behaviors in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 24(10):1250–1257. doi: 10.1002/pon.3857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Short CE, Rebar AL, Plotnikoff RC, Vandelanotte C (2015) Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. The European Health Psychologist 17(1):32–38Google Scholar
- 14.Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries KN, Brug J, Oenema A (2011) Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 13(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1639 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S (2016) Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Behav Med Pract Policy Res:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1
- 16.Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, Merchant GC, Naughton F, Blanford A (2016) Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med:1–28Google Scholar
- 17.Morrison LG (2015) Theory-based strategies for enhancing the impact and usage of digital health behaviour change interventions: a review. Digital Health 1Google Scholar
- 18.Vandelanotte C, Muller AM, Short CE, Hingle M, Nathan N, Williams SL, Lopez ML, Parekh S, Maher CA (2016) Past, present, and future of eHealth and mHealth research to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav 48(3):219–228 e211. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Short C, Rebar A, James E, Duncan M, Courneya K, Plotnikoff R, Crutzen R, Vandelanotte C (2016) How do different delivery schedules of tailored web-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors influence intervention use and efficacy? Journal of Cancer Survivorship:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0565-0
- 21.Short CE, James E, Girgis A, D'souza M, Plotnikoff RC (2015) Main outcomes of the Move More for Life Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the effects of tailored and targeted-print materials on physical activity, sitting-time and quality of life among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 24(7):771–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Short CE, James E, Plotnikoff RC (2013) Theory-and evidence-based development and process evaluation of the Move More for Life program: a tailored-print intervention designed to promote physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity 10:124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior 31 (2):143-164. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660
- 28.StataCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
- 35.Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Dixon MW, Rosenkranz R, Caperchione C, Hooker C, Karunanithi M, Kolt GS, Maeder A, Ding H, Taylor P, Duncan MJ (2014) Examining participant engagement in an information technology-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for men: the manup randomized controlled trial. JMIR research protocols 3(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2776 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Kanera IM, Willems RA, Bolman CAW, Mesters I, Zambon V, Gijsen BC, Lechner L (2016) Use and appreciation of a tailored self-management eHealth intervention for early cancer survivors: process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 18(8):e229. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5975 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Hill JO (2009) Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. Am J Clin Nutr 89(2):477–484. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26566 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Lee MK, Park H-A, Yun YH, Chang YJ (2013) Development and formative evaluation of a web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention program with tailored motivation and action planning for cancer survivors. JMIR research protocols 2(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2331 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Vandelanotte C, Short C, Plotnikoff RC, Hooker C, Canoy D, Rebar A, Alley S, Schoeppe S, Mummery WK, Duncan MJ (2015) TaylorActive—examining the effectiveness of web-based personally-tailored videos to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health 15:1020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2363-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.De Cocker K, Charlier C, Van Hoof E, Pauwels E, Lechner L, Bourgois J, Spittaels H, Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2015) Development and usability of a computer-tailored pedometer-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors. European Journal of Cancer Care 24(5):673–682. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12225 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Forbes CC, Blanchard CM, Mummery WK, KS C (2015) Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online intervention to increase physical activity in Nova Scotian cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial JMIR Cancer 1 ((2):e12)Google Scholar
- 44.Sadasivam RS, Cutrona SL, Kinney RL, Marlin BM, Mazor KM, Lemon SC, Houston TK (2016) Collective-intelligence recommender systems: advancing computer tailoring for health behavior change into the 21st century. J Med Internet Res 18(3):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4448 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar