Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 3551–3559 | Cite as

Effect of an Internet-based telehealth system on functional capacity and cognition in breast cancer survivors: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

  • Noelia Galiano-Castillo
  • Manuel Arroyo-MoralesEmail author
  • Mario Lozano-Lozano
  • Carolina Fernández-Lao
  • Lydia Martín-Martín
  • Rosario Del-Moral-Ávila
  • Irene Cantarero-Villanueva
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

This trial determines the effect of an Internet-based tailored exercise program compared to usual care control for improving functional capacity and cognition among breast cancer survivors.

Methods

A two-arm, assessor-blinded, parallel, randomized controlled efficacy trial was conducted. Participants were recruited from the Oncology and Breast unit at the Virgen de las Nieves Hospital (Granada, Spain) between March 2012 to November 2013 and randomized to either the experimental group (an 8-week Internet-based tailored exercise program) or control group (usual care). The outcome measures were the 6-min walk test, Auditory Consonant Trigrams, and Trail Making Test. All were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up.

Results

After intervention, the telerehabilitation group had significantly improved distances (d = 0.92, P < 0.001) as well as percentage of predicted of the 6-min walk test (d = 0.93, P < 0.001) compared with the control group. Significant improvement was also observed favoring the telerehabilitation group for the number of consonants recalled in total compared with the control group (d = 0.47, P = 0.04). These findings were maintained after 6-month follow-up (d = 0.80, P = 0.001; d = 0.76, P = 0.002; and d = 0.57, P = 0.02, respectively). Analysis was based on intention-to-treat principle.

Conclusions

These findings support the effectiveness of a telehealth system based on an 8-week physical exercise to achieve improvements and maintain them after 6-month follow-up in terms of functional and cognitive performance in breast cancer survivors. This broad-reach modality could help the growing number of cancer survivors to face their disabling side effects.

Keywords

Breast cancer E-health Exercise Telehealth Telerehabilitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants, without whom this work would not have been possible. This study takes place thanks to the additional funding from the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence; Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by a research project grant (FIS PI10/02749-02764) from the Health Institute Carlos III and PN I + D + I 2008–2011 (FEDER funds); grants (Program FPU AP2010–6075 and Program FPU 14/01069) from the Education Ministry, Madrid, Spanish Government; and a grant from the Andalusian Health Service, Junta de Andalucía (PI-0457-2010).

Supplementary material

520_2017_3782_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (6.4 mb)
Explanatory video 1 (MP4 6562 kb)
520_2017_3782_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (5.4 mb)
Explanatory video 2 (MP4 5502 kb)
520_2017_3782_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 (1.5 mb)
Explanatory video 3 (MP4 1489 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050518 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC et al (2016) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:271–289. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chirikos TN, Russell-Jacobs A, Jacobsen PB (2002) Functional impairment and the economic consequences of female breast cancer. Women Health 36:1–20. doi: 10.1300/J013v36n01_01 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crowgey T, Peters KB, Hornsby WE et al (2014) Relationship between exercise behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cognitive function in early breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy: a pilot study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 39:724–729. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0380 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wefel JS, Saleeba AK, Buzdar AU, Meyers CA (2010) Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Cancer 116:3348–3356. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG et al (2011) An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol 38:431–438. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL et al (2016) American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:611–635. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3809 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kampshoff CS, Jansen F, van Mechelen W et al (2014) Determinants of exercise adherence and maintenance among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11:80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-80 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L (2011) Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 17:281–287. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101208 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M (2009) A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 31:427–447. doi: 10.1080/09638280802062553 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh R, Goebel LJ (2016) Rural disparities in cancer care: a review of its implications and possible interventions. W V Med J 112:76–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irvine AB, Gelatt VA, Seeley JR et al (2013) Web-based intervention to promote physical activity by sedentary older adults: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 15:e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2158 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinto BM, Frierson GM, Rabin C et al (2005) Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:3577–3587. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.080 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pinto BM, Rabin C, Papandonatos GD et al (2008) Maintenance of effects of a home-based physical activity program among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 16:1279–1289. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0434-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C et al (2013) Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med 34:631–636. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H et al (2015) Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev 52:361–370. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernandez-Lao C et al (2016) Telehealth system: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an Internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 122:3166–3174. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30172 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galiano-Castillo N, Ariza-Garcia A, Cantarero-Villanueva I et al (2013) Telehealth system (e-CUIDATE) to improve quality of life in breast cancer survivors: rationale and study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials 14:187. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-187 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C et al (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T et al (2014) An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 44:1428–1446. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150314 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galiano-Castillo N, Arroyo-Morales M, Ariza-Garcia A et al (2016) The six-minute walk test as a measure of health in breast cancer patients. J Aging Phys Act 24:508–515. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0056 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laskin JJ, Bundy S, Marron H et al (2007) Using a treadmill for the 6-minute walk test: reliability and validity. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 27:407–410. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000300270.45881.d0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Enright PL, Sherrill DL (1998) Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1384–1387. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shura RD, Rowland JA, Miskey HM (2016) Auditory Consonant Trigrams: a psychometric updatedagger. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 31:47–57. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv083 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turkes N, Can H, Kurt M, Elmastas Dikec B (2015) A study to determine the norms for the Trail Making Test for the age range of 20–49 in Turkey. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 26:189–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Granger CL, Holland AE, Gordon IR, Denehy L (2015) Minimal important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in lung cancer. Chron Respir Dis 12:146–154. doi: 10.1177/1479972315575715 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vardar Yagli N, Sener G, Arikan H et al (2015) Do yoga and aerobic exercise training have impact on functional capacity, fatigue, peripheral muscle strength, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors? Integr Cancer Ther 14:125–132. doi: 10.1177/1534735414565699 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wurz A, St-Aubin A, Brunet J (2015) Breast cancer survivors’ barriers and motives for participating in a group-based physical activity program offered in the community. Support Care Cancer 23:2407–2416. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2596-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rikli R, Jones CJ (1999) Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Act 7:129–161. doi: 10.1123/japa.7.2.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rodby KA, Robinson E, Danielson KK et al (2016) Age-dependent characteristics in women with breast cancer: mastectomy and reconstructive trends at an urban academic institution. Am Surg 82:227–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feiten S, Dunnebacke J, Heymanns J et al (2014) Breast cancer morbidity: questionnaire survey of patients on the long-term effects of disease and adjuvant therapy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:537–544. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0537 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    MacVicar MG, Winningham ML, Nickel JL (1989) Effects of aerobic interval training on cancer patients’ functional capacity. Nurs Res 38:348–351. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198911000-00007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tao JJ, Visvanathan K, Wolff AC (2015) Long term side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. Breast 24(Suppl 2):S149–S153. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.035 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stevens D, Elpern E, Sharma K et al (1999) Comparison of hallway and treadmill six-minute walk tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1540–1543. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9808139 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    de Almeida FG, Victor EG, Rizzo JA (2009) Hallway versus treadmill 6-minute-walk tests in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Care 54:1712–1716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Olper L, Cervi P, De Santi F et al (2011) Validation of the treadmill six-minute walk test in people following cardiac surgery. Phys Ther 91:566–576. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100156 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baumann FT, Drosselmeyer N, Leskaroski A et al (2011) 12-week resistance training with breast cancer patients during chemotherapy: effects on cognitive abilities. Breast Care 6:142–143. doi: 10.1159/000327505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brayne C (2007) The elephant in the room—healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:233–239. doi: 10.1038/nrn2091 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vaughan S, Wallis M, Polit D et al (2014) The effects of multimodal exercise on cognitive and physical functioning and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in older women: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 43:623–629. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taillibert S, Le Rhun E, Chamberlain MC (2016) Chemotherapy-related neurotoxicity. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 16:81. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0686-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stouten-Kemperman MM, de Ruiter MB, Koppelmans V et al (2015) Neurotoxicity in breast cancer survivors >/=10 years post-treatment is dependent on treatment type. Brain Imaging Behav 9:275–284. doi: 10.1007/s11682-014-9305-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noelia Galiano-Castillo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Manuel Arroyo-Morales
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Mario Lozano-Lozano
    • 2
  • Carolina Fernández-Lao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lydia Martín-Martín
    • 2
  • Rosario Del-Moral-Ávila
    • 4
  • Irene Cantarero-Villanueva
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Biomedical Research (ibs.GRANADA), University Hospital Complex of GranadaUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, Health Science FacultyUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Sport and Health Research Center (CIDS)GranadaSpain
  4. 4.Radiotherapy Breast Oncology UnitUniversity Hospital Virgen de las NievesGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations