Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 3329–3338 | Cite as

Psychometric testing of the Mandarin version of the 34-item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey in patients with cancer in mainland China

  • Yuan Han
  • Ying Zhou
  • Jing Wang
  • Qian Zhao
  • Huiying Qin
  • Yuying Fan
  • Yalan Song
  • Allison Boyes
  • Shuzhong CuiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Although the Supportive Care Needs Survey is one of the most comprehensive and robust cancer-specific needs assessment instruments, no version exists specifically for cancer patients in mainland China. This study tested the psychometric properties of the Mandarin version of the 34-item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34-C (Mandarin)) in mainland Chinese cancer patients.

Methods

From December 2015 to May 2016, patients were recruited from two cancer centers in Guangzhou, China, to complete the SCNS-SF34-C (Mandarin). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to test the factor structure. The internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the resulting factor structure were evaluated by traditional psychometric analysis.

Results

A total of 861 patients completed the SCNS-SF34-C (Mandarin). Item 14 was removed for its low factor loadings on every factor in the initial EFA. Using the remaining 33 items, the reiterated EFA produced a five-dimension structure that was consistent with the dimensions of the original version of the SCNS-SF34 (health system and information, psychological, patient care and support, physical and daily living, and sexuality), accounting for 69.757% of the total variance. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.854 to 0.942 for the five domains and 0.947 for the whole scale. Convergent validity was verified by significant correlations with all corresponding instruments. It discriminated between groups based on age, sex, marital status, and stage of disease.

Conclusions

Preliminary evidence suggests that the SCNS-SF34-C (Mandarin) is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the supportive care needs of cancer patients in mainland China.

Keywords

Needs assessment Cancer Psychometrics Reliability Validity Questionnaires 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant #A2015141 from the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China. The authors express thanks to Min Wei, Weiwen Cui, Qing Zhang, Guilian He, Jialing Lu, Xueying Xiao, Jingjing He, and Hongyan Shao for the contributions to questionnaire translation, data collection, and data management. The authors are grateful to every patient for participating in the survey. The authors thank Markeda Wade, ELS, at UTHealth School of Nursing for editorial review of the manuscript. Prof. Cui is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81372493). Dr. Wang is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program (Grant No. 71245). Dr. Boyes is supported by a National Health & Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (Grant No. 1073317) and Cancer Institute New South Wales Early Career Fellowship (Grant No. 13/ECF/1-37).

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the ethics committees of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center and the Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University in Guangzhou, China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quinten C, Coens C, Ghislain I et al (2015) The effects of age on health-related quality of life in cancer populations: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 involving 6024 cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 51:2808–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ (2001) Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 88:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edib Z, Kumarasamy V, Binti AN, Rizal AM, Al-Dubai SA (2016) Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs and quality of life of breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng KK, Wong WH, Koh C (2016) Unmet needs mediate the relationship between symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 24:2025–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    So WK, Choi KC, Chen JM et al (2014) Quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors at 1 year after treatment: the mediating role of unmet supportive care needs. Support Care Cancer 22:2917–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galvão DA, Newton RU, Gardiner RA, Girgis A et al (2015) Compliance to exercise-oncology guidelines in prostate cancer survivors and associations with psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, and quality of life. Psychooncology 24:1241–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young J, Harrison J, Solomon M et al (2010) Development and feasibility assessment of telephone-delivered supportive care to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer: pilot study of the CONNECT intervention. Support Care Cancer 18:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson A, Medina J, Brown V, Sitzia J (2007) Patients’ needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools. Support Care Cancer 15:1125–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2009) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 17:1117–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A, the Supportive Care Review Group (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McElduff P, Boyes A, Zucca A, Girgis A (2004) The supportive care needs survey: a guide to administration, scoring and analysis. Centre for Health Research & Psycho-Oncology, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C (2009) Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item supportive care needs survey (SCNS-SF34). J Eval Clin Pract 15:602–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Girgis A, Stojanovski E, Boyes A, King M, Lecathelinais C (2012) The next generation of the supportive care needs survey: a brief screening tool for administration in the clinical oncology setting. Psychooncology 21:827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okuyama T, Akechi T, Yamashita H, Toyama T, Endo C, Sagawa R, Uchida M, Furukawa TA (2009) Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J). Psychooncology 18:1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehmann C, Koch U, Mehnert A (2012) Psychometric properties of the German version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-G). Support Care Cancer 20:2415–2424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brédart A, Kop JL, Griesser AC et al (2012) Validation of the 34-item supportive care needs survey and 8-item breast module French versions (SCNS-SF34-Fr and SCNS-BR8-Fr) in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care 21:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeneli A, Fabbri E, Donati E et al (2016) Translation of supportive care needs survey short form 34 (SCNS-SF34) into Italian and cultural validation study. Support Care Cancer 24:843–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jansen F, Witte BI, van Uden-Kraan CF, Braspenning AM, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de LI (2016) The need for supportive care among head and neck cancer patients: psychometric assessment of the Dutch version of the supportive care needs survey short-form (SCNS-SF34) and the newly developed head and neck cancer module (SCNS-HNC). Support Care Cancer 24:4639–4649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Au A, Lam WW, Kwong A et al (2011) Validation of the Chinese version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-C). Psychooncology 20:1292–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li WW, Lam WW, Shun SC et al (2013) Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the supportive care needs survey short-form (SCNS-SF34-C) among Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese colorectal cancer patients. PLoS One 8:e75755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzner KA, Coughlin S, Tomori C, Bennett CL (2000) Health care in Hong Kong and mainland China: one country, two systems? Health Policy 53:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kreng VB, Yang CT (2011) The equality of resource allocation in health care under the National Health Insurance System in Taiwan. Health Policy 100:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duffy ME (2006) Translating instruments into other languages: basic considerations. Clin Nurse Spec 20:225–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leung CM, Ho S, Kan CS, Hung CH, Chen CN (1993) Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A cross-cultural perspective. Int J Psychosom 40:29–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O et al (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xiao SY (1994) Theoretical foundation and research application about the social support rating scale. J Clin Psychiat Med 4:98–100Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gerstman BB (2008) Basic biostatistics: statistics for public health practice. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faller H, Koch U, Brähler E et al (2016) Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer. J Cancer Surviv10: 62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group Cancer 88:226–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boyes AW, Girgis A, D'Este C, Zucca AC (2012) Prevalence and correlates of cancer survivors’ supportive care needs 6 months after diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 12:150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ahern T, Gardner A, Courtney M (2016) Exploring patient support by breast care nurses and geographical residence as moderators of the unmet needs and self-efficacy of Australian women with breast cancer: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs 23:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hsu CY, O'Connor M, Lee S (2009) Understandings of death and dying for people of Chinese origin. Death Stud 33:153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dezutter J, Soenens B, Luyckx K et al (2009) The role of religion in death attitudes: distinguishing between religious belief and style of processing religious contents. Death Stud 33:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kong X, Yang Y, Gao J et al (2015) Overview of the health care system in Hong Kong and its referential significance to mainland China. J Chin Med Assoc 78:569–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang J, Sun X, Cai R et al (2013) Attitudes and behavior of radiation oncologists toward sexual issues of cervical cancer patients who receive radiation therapy: a survey in China. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang LL, Pu J, Liu LH et al (2013) Cancer department nurses’ attitudes and practices in response to the sexual issues of pelvic radiation patients: a survey in Sichuan, China. Contemp Nurse 43:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuan Han
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ying Zhou
    • 2
  • Jing Wang
    • 3
  • Qian Zhao
    • 4
  • Huiying Qin
    • 5
  • Yuying Fan
    • 5
  • Yalan Song
    • 1
  • Allison Boyes
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Shuzhong Cui
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of NursingGuangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.School of NursingThe University of Texas Health Science CenterHoustonUSA
  4. 4.School of Public HealthGuangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  5. 5.Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer CenterSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  6. 6.Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviorThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  7. 7.Hunter Medical Research InstituteNewcastleAustralia
  8. 8.Hunter Cancer Research AllianceNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations