Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 3059–3066 | Cite as

Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in breast cancer patients

  • Filipa Fontes
  • Marta Gonçalves
  • Susana Maia
  • Susana Pereira
  • Milton Severo
  • Nuno Lunet
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to assess the factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the European Portuguese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in breast cancer patients.

Methods

This study was based on a cohort of breast cancer patients, among whom the PSQI was used to measure sleep quality three years after cancer diagnosis (N = 474). A sample of 62 participants underwent additional PSQI testing, wore a wrist actigraph for five consecutive days, and was reevaluated with the PSQI after one month. A confirmatory factor analysis, considering the components suggested by the principal component analysis (PCA), was performed to determine model fit. To evaluate internal consistency and test-retest reliability, Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated, respectively. To assess construct validity, Spearman’s correlation coefficients were computed between PSQI scores and actigraphy measures and other theoretical related constructs.

Results

PCA suggested one or two components. The latter showed better fit to the data, though the two factors were strongly correlated (r = 0.76) and internal consistency was not satisfactory for one of the factors. Regarding the one-factor model, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.70) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.76) were adequate. Sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, and sleep disturbance dimensions were significantly correlated with the corresponding actigraphy measures; the PSQI global score derived from the one-factor model was more strongly correlated with subjective sleep complaints (r ≥ 0.60).

Conclusions

The unidimensional construct of the European Portuguese version of the PSQI showed adequate reliability and validity among breast cancer patients.

Keywords

Actigraphy Breast neoplasms Principal component analysis Psychometrics Sleep 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by FEDER through the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016867) and national funding from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education) (PTDC/DTP-EPI/7283/2014) under the Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia - Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (EPIUnit) (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006862; Ref.UID/DTP/04750/2013); the PhD Grant SFRH/BD/92630/2013 (Filipa Fontes) co-funded by the FCT and the POPH/FSE Program.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (Ref. CES 99/2014 and CES 201/2015) and by the Portuguese Data Protection Authority (Ref. 8601/2014). All participants provided written informed consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Otte JL, Carpenter JS, Russell KM, Bigatti S, Champion VL (2010) Prevalence, severity, and correlates of sleep-wake disturbances in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:535–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desai K, Mao JJ, Su I et al (2013) Prevalence and risk factors for insomnia among breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitors. Support Care Cancer 21:43–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fortner BV, Stepanski EJ, Wang SC, Kasprowicz S, Durrence HH (2002) Sleep and quality of life in breast cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manag 24:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savard J, Villa J, Ivers H, Simard S, Morin CM (2009) Prevalence, natural course, and risk factors of insomnia comorbid with cancer over a 2-month period. J Clin Oncol 27:5233–5239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson JR, MacLean AW, Brundage MD, Schulze K (2002) Sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 54:1309–1321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpenter JS, Elam JL, Ridner SH et al (2004) Sleep, fatigue, and depressive symptoms in breast cancer survivors and matched healthy women experiencing hot flashes. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:591–5598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlson LE, Campbell TS, Garland SN, Grossman P (2007) Associations among salivary cortisol, melatonin, catecholamines, sleep quality and stress in women with breast cancer and healthy controls. J Behav Med 30:45–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu L, Fiorentino L, Rissling M et al (2013) Decreased health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer is associated with poor sleep. Behav Sleep Med 11:189–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roscoe JA, Kaufman ME, Matteson-Rusby SE et al (2007) Cancer-related fatigue and sleep disorders. Oncologist 12(Suppl 1):35–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanford SD, Beaumont JL, Butt Z et al (2014) Prospective longitudinal evaluation of a symptom cluster in breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 47:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28:193–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mollayeva T, Thurairajah P, Burton K et al (2016) The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 25:52–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicassio PM, Ormseth SR, Custodio MK et al (2014) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Behav Sleep Med 12:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Otte JL, Rand KL, Carpenter JS, Russell KM, Champion VL (2013) Factor analysis of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manag 45:620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomfohr LM, Schweizer CA, Dimsdale JE, Loredo JS (2013) Psychometric characteristics of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in English speaking non-Hispanic whites and English and Spanish speaking Hispanics of Mexican descent. J Clin Sleep Med 9:61–66PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotronoulas GC, Papadopoulou CN, Papapetrou A, Patiraki E (2011) Psychometric evaluation and feasibility of the Greek Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (GR-PSQI) in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19:1831–1840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho RT, Fong TC (2014) Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in breast cancer patients. Sleep Med 15:565–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Rio Joao KA, Becker NB, de Neves JS, Isabel Santos Martins R (2017) Validation of the Portuguese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-PT). Psychiatry Res 247:225–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marques D, Gomes AA, Meiavia A et al (2013) Reliability and initial validation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, European Portuguese version: a preliminary study in a sample of higher education students. Sleep Medicine 14:e140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pereira S, Fontes F, Sonin T et al (2014) Neurological complications of breast cancer: study protocol of a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 4:e006301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freitas S, Simoes MR, Alves L, Santana I (2011) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): normative study for the Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:989–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paiva T, Penzel T. (2011) [Centro de Medicina do Sono: Manual Prático]. Lidel, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O'Hare E, Flanagan D, Penzel T et al (2015) A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects. Sleep Breath 19:91–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alsaadi SM, McAuley JH, Hush JM et al (2014) Assessing sleep disturbance in low back pain: the validity of portable instruments. PLoS One 9:e95824CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meltzer LJ, Walsh CM, Peightal AA (2015) Comparison of actigraphy immobility rules with polysomnographic sleep onset latency in children and adolescents. Sleep Breath 19:1415–1423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raîche G, Walls TA, Magis D, Riopel M, Blais J-G (2013) Non-graphical solutions for Cattell’s scree test. Methodology 9:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6:53–60Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nunnally J, Bernstein L (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Higher, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rener-Sitar K, John MT, Bandyopadhyay D, Howell MJ, Schiffman EL (2014) Exploration of dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in cases with temporomandibular disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sitasuwan T, Bussaratid S, Ruttanaumpawan P, Chotinaiwattarakul W (2014) Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Med Assoc Thail 97(Suppl 3):S57–S67Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C et al (2003) The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 26:342–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grandner MA, Kripke DF, Yoon IY, Youngstedt SD (2006) Criterion validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: investigation in a non-clinical sample. Sleep Biol Rhythms 4:129–139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spira AP, Beaudreau SA, Stone KL et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67:433–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beaudreau SA, Spira AP, Stewart A et al (2012) Validation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in older black and white women. Sleep Med 13:36–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filipa Fontes
    • 1
  • Marta Gonçalves
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susana Maia
    • 2
  • Susana Pereira
    • 1
    • 3
  • Milton Severo
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nuno Lunet
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.ISPUP – EPIUnitUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Centro de Medicina do Sono – Hospital CUF PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Instituto Português de Oncologia do PortoPortoPortugal
  4. 4.Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations