Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 2809–2814 | Cite as

Compliance and safety of a novel home exercise program for patients with high-grade brain tumors, a prospective observational study

  • Jennifer Baima
  • Zehra B. Omer
  • John Varlotto
  • Shakeeb Yunus
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate compliance with and safety of a novel independent home exercise program for patients with high-grade brain tumors. We designed this program around the preferences and individual capabilities of this population as well as the potential barriers to exercise in cancer patients. Demographics were collected to better understand those that persisted with exercise.

Methods

Subjects with high-grade brain tumor received one-time training that included watching an exercise video and live demonstration of resistance band exercises, a balance exercise, and recommendations for walking. Subjects were instructed to do the exercises every day for 1 month. Main outcome measures were percentage of subjects who exercised throughout the month, frequency of exercising, demographic factors, quality of life scores (assessed by FACT-BR), and self report of adverse events.

Results

Fourteen of the 15 (93%) subjects started the exercises during the course of the month. Nine of the fifteen (60%) continued the exercises throughout the month. Three additional subjects would have continued to exercise if formal or supervised rehabilitation had been offered. Among the subjects who continued the exercises regularly, higher frequency of exercising was significantly associated with living as married (p = 0.033), annual income >$50,000 (p = 0.047), scores of physical well-being (p = 0.047), and brain cancer specific well-being (p = 0.054) subscales. Among those who exercised frequently, there was also a trend towards increase in total FACT-BR scores (p = 0.059). The subjects who scored higher on the social well-being subscale of the FACT-BR at baseline self-reported a higher likelihood to continue the exercises after 1 month of participation in the study (p = 0.018). No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Our small group of subjects with high-grade brain tumors demonstrated compliance with and safety of a novel independent strength and balance exercise program in the home setting. Higher frequency of exercising was associated with life quality parameters as well as marriage and income.

Keywords

Brain neoplasms Rehabilitation Exercise Muscle weakness 

Supplementary material

520_2017_3695_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 13 kb)
520_2017_3695_MOESM2_ESM.docx (256 kb)
ESM 2(DOCX 255 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas CL (1997) Taber’s cyclopedic medical dictionary, 18th edn. FA Davis Company, Philadelphia, p 425Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC and Snyder C (2012) Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. The Cochrane LibraryGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones LW, Courneya KS, Peddle C, Mackey JR (2005) Oncologists’ opinions towards recommending exercise to patients with cancer: a Canadian national survey. Support Care Cancer 13(11):929–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourke L, Homer KE, Thaha MA, Steed L, Rosario DJ, Robb KA, Saxton JM, Taylor SJC (2014) Interventions to improve exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 110(4):831–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones LW, Courneya KS (2002) Exercise counseling and programming preferences of cancer survivors. Cancer Pract 10(4):208–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Courneya KS, McKenzie DC, Reid RD, Mackey JR, Gelmon K, Friedenreich CM, Ladha AB, Proulx C, Lane K, Vallance JK, Segal RJ (2008) Barriers to supervised exercise training in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Ann Behav Med 35(1):116–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Robbins KT, Malone J, Seiz A, Koch L, Rao K (2008) Physical activity correlates and barriers in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 16(1):19–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ottenbacher AJ, Day RS, Taylor WC, Sharma SV, Sloane R, Snyder DC, Kraus WE, Demark-Wahnefried W (2011) Exercise among breast and prostate cancer survivors—what are their barriers? J Cancer Surviv 5(4):413–419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH (2013) Cancer survivors’ exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire–survey. Psycho-Oncology 22(1):186–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruderman NB, Hall TC (1965) Use of glucocorticoids in the palliative treatment of metastatic brain tumors. Cancer 18(3):298–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horber FF, Scheidegger JR, Grunig BE, Frey FJ (1985) Evidence that prednisone-induced myopathy is reversed by physical training*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 61(1):83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keilani M, Krall C, Marosi C, Flechl B, Dieckmann K, Widhalm G, Marhold M, Crevenna R (2012) Strength of skeletal muscle and self-reported physical performance in Austrian glioblastoma-patients. Wien Klin Wochenschr 124(11–12):377–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruden E, Reardon DA, Coan AD, Herndon JE, Hornsby WE, West M, Fels DR, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, Waner E, Friedman AH (2011) Exercise behavior, functional capacity, and survival in adults with malignant recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol 29(21):2918–2923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones LW, Guill B, Keir ST, Carter K, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Reardon DA (2007) Exercise interest and preferences among patients diagnosed with primary brain cancer. Support Care Cancer 15(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VbPqb8Nr9I. Accessed November 15, 2016
  16. 16.
    http://www.ballsnbands.com. Accessed November 30,2016
  17. 17.
    Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Gelke CK et al (1995) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale: development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer 75(5):1151–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruun DM, Krustrup P, Hornstrup T, Uth J, Brasso K, Rørth M, Christensen JF, Midtgaard J (2014) “All boys and men can play football”: a qualitative investigation of recreational football in prostate cancer patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24(S1):113–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogers LQ, Matevey C, Hopkins-Price P, Shah P, Dunnington G, Courneya KS (2004) Exploring social cognitive theory constructs for promoting exercise among breast cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 27(6):462–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baima J, Reynolds SG, Edmiston K, Larkin A, Ward BM and O’Connor A (2015) Teaching of independent exercises for prehabilitation in breast cancer. Journal of Cancer Education :1–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ford ES, Merritt RK, Heath GW, Powell KE, Washburn RA, Kriska A, Haile G (1991) Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. Am J Epidemiol 133(12):1246–1256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones LW, Friedman AH, West MJ, Mabe SK, Fraser J, Kraus WE, Friedman HS, Tresch MI, Major N, Reardon DA (2010) Quantitative assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle function, and body composition in adults with primary malignant glioma. Cancer 116(3):695–704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tyson SF and Connell LA (2009) How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clinical RehabilitationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics and Physical RehabilitationUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS)WorcesterUSA
  2. 2.UMass Memorial Medical CenterWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS)WorcesterUSA
  4. 4.Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and OncologyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS)WorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations