Oncology care provider perspectives on exercise promotion in people with cancer: an examination of knowledge, practices, barriers, and facilitators
- 708 Downloads
Despite the reported benefits of physical activity in alleviating the impact of cancer and its treatments, oncology care providers (OCPs) are not routinely discussing exercise with their patients, suggesting a knowledge to action gap. We sought to determine OCP’s knowledge, beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to exercise discussion.
A survey was administered to OCPs at the cancer center in Hamilton, Ontario. Questions comprised of demographics, knowledge and beliefs regarding exercise guidelines, and barriers and facilitators to exercise discussion. Analysis of survey responses was descriptive. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to examine select associations.
There were 120 respondents (61% response rate) representing a diversity of professions. Approximately, 80% of OCPs were not aware of any exercise guidelines in cancer and self-reported poor knowledge on when, how, and which patients to refer to exercise programs. OCPs who reported meeting Canada’s Physical Activity guidelines were significantly more likely to identify correct guidelines (p = 0.023) and to report good knowledge on how to provide exercise counseling (p = 0.014). Across OCP groups, barriers to exercise discussion included poor knowledge, lack of time, and safety concerns. Most felt that educational sessions and having an exercise specialist on the clinical team would be beneficial.
OCPs have low knowledge regarding exercise counseling, but believe that discussing exercise is a multidisciplinary task and expressed a desire for further training. Interventions will require a multi-pronged approach including education for OCPs and guidance on assessment for exercise safety.
KeywordsNeoplasms Medical oncology Exercise Physical activity Guideline Patient care team Knowledge Knowledge translation
Conceptualization M.N., J.S.; methodology M.N., J.T., O.C., R.J., J.S.; validation and investigation M.N., D.B., J.T. J.S.; resources J.S.; writing M.N., D.B., J.S., review and editing M.N., D.B., J.T., O.C., J.S.; administration M.N.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study received funding from the supportive cancer care research unit at the JCC.
- 1.Canadian Cancer Society. Canadian Cancer Statistics Publication. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=on. Accessed June 2016
- 2.Society AC (2016) Lifetime Risk of Developing or Dying From Cancer. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer
- 12.Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone J, Loblaw A, Petrella T (2015) A quality initiative of the Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Exercise for People with Cancer Google Scholar
- 19.Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences (2016) Treatment and services: JCC clinics; Available from: http://www.jcc.hhsc.ca/body.cfm?id=307. Accessed July 2016.
- 21.Cheifetz O (2007) Cancer and exercise: a survey of patients' knowledge and preferences. Hamilton, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- 24.(CSEP), C.S.E.P. Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults 18–64 years. 2011 2016]. http://www.csep.ca/guidelines. Accessed July 2016
- 29.Frank E et al (2010) Predictors of Canadian physicians' prevention counseling practices. Can J Public Health 101(5):390–395Google Scholar
- 33.J., H., Supportive Treatment for Cancer - Part 1: Exercise Treatment. 2012, Health Care Knowledge Centre: Brussels: Belgian.Google Scholar