Follow-up cancer care: perspectives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer survivors
The purpose of this study was to explore Indigenous Australian cancer survivors’ perspectives of follow-up cancer care and management..
This is a qualitative study employing individual interviews with 21 Indigenous cancer survivors (13 females, 8 males) recruited from a rural primary health service and large tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Queensland. Yarning methods were used to conduct semi-structured interviews. Yarning is a culturally appropriate, informal conversational process emphasising the importance of storytelling.
Findings describe a range of ways in which follow-up cancer care is experienced with four major categories elucidated, namely: links to tertiary health services, links to primary health services, communication between tertiary and primary health services, and lost in transition. Both positive and negative experiences were described; however, the importance of timely and informative discharge information, continuity of care, good communication between tertiary and primary health services, and strong therapeutic relationships were salient issues raised by participants.
These findings highlight the importance of establishing strong therapeutic relationships between patients and tertiary and primary health professionals. Also important for survivorship is provision of discharge summaries or care plans at discharge for survivors and general practitioners as well as access to a range of allied health services. Alternative means for follow-up could be investigated for regional and rural survivors to facilitate convenient and cost-effective follow-up care. Finally, provision of responsive and flexible follow-up care to cater for the diverse range of needs and preferences of cancer survivors is required. A patient navigator available across the cancer continuum could go some way to addressing this.
KeywordsCancer Primary care Indigenous Follow-up Qualitative
- 1.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014) Cancer in Australia: an overview 2014. Cancer series no 90. Cat. no. CAN 88. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 2.Valery PC, Coory M, Stirling J (2006) Cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians: a matched cohort study. Lancet (North American edition) [HWWilson - GS] 367:1842Google Scholar
- 3.Condon JR, Armstrong BK, Barnes A, Cunningham J (2003) Cancer in Indigenous Australians: a review. Cancer Causes Control 14(2):109–121. doi:10.1023/A:1023064400004
- 6.Shahid S, Durey A, Bessarab D, Aoun SM, Thompson SC (2013) Identifying barriers and improving communication between cancer service providers and Aboriginal patients and their families: the perspective of service providers. BMC Health Serv Res 13(1):460–472. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Treloar C, Gray R, Brener L, Jackson C, Saunders V, Johnson P, Harris M, Butow P, Newman C (2014) “I can’t do this, it’s too much”: building social inclusion in cancer diagnosis and treatment experiences of Aboriginal people, their carers and health workers. International journal of public health 59(2):373. doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0466-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Smith T, Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, Rowland JH (2014) Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 32(15):1578–1585. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dwyer J, Swinburn K, Wilson G (2004) National strategies for improving Indigenous health and health care. Australian Government Department of Health. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-oatsih-pubs-reviewphc.htm
- 11.Bessarab D, Ng’andu B (2010) Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method of Indigenous research. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 3(1):37–50Google Scholar
- 13.QSR International Pty Ltd (2012) NVivo qualitative data analysis software version 10. http://www.qsrinternational.com/product
- 14.Charmaz C (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2004) Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Vol cat. No PHE 53. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 22.Meiklejohn JA, Adams J, Valery PC, Walpole ET, Martin JH, Williams HM, Garvey G (2015) Indigenous cancer care in Queensland, Australia: health professionals’ framing of “difference”. The Australian Journal of Cancer Nursing 16(1):4–12Google Scholar
- 32.Ware V (2013) Improving the accessibility of health services in urban and regional settings for Indigenous people. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Closing the Gap Clearinghouse, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 33.Whop L, Garvey G, Baade P, Cunningham J, Lokuge K, Brotherton J, Valery PC, O’Connell DL, Canfell K, Diaz A, Roder D, Gertig D, Moore SP, Condon J (2016) The first comprehensive report on Indigenous Australian women’s inequalities in cervical screening: a retrospective registry cohort study in Queensland, Australia (2000-2011). Cancer 122(10):1560–1569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Davy C, Harfield S, Mcarthur A, Munn Z, Brown A (2016) Access to primary health care services for Indigenous peoples: a framework synthesis. Int J Equity Health 15. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0450-5
- 36.De Maeseneer J, Willems S, De Sutter A, Van de Geuchte I, Billings M (2007) Primary health care as a strategy for achieving equitable care: a literature review commissioned by the Health Systems Knowledge Network. WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, Health Systems Knowledge NetworkGoogle Scholar