A good death from the perspective of palliative cancer patients
- 2.4k Downloads
Although previous research has indicated some recurrent themes and similarities between what patients from different cultures regard as a good death, the concept is complex and there is lack of studies from the Nordic countries. The aim of this study was to explore the perception of a good death in dying cancer patients in Sweden.
Interviews were conducted with 66 adult patients with cancer in the palliative phase who were recruited from home care and hospital care. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Participants viewed death as a process. A good death was associated with living with the prospect of imminent death, preparing for death and dying comfortably, e.g., dying quickly, with independence, with minimised suffering and with social relations intact. Some were comforted by their belief that death is predetermined. Others felt uneasy as they considered death an end to existence. Past experiences of the death of others influenced participants’ views of a good death.
Healthcare staff caring for palliative patients should consider asking them to describe what they consider a good death in order to identify goals for care. Exploring patients’ personal experience of death and dying can help address their fears as death approaches.
KeywordsPalliative care Qualitative research Good death Attitude to death End-of-life care Quality of death
Compliance with ethical standards
- 21.Kvale S (1996) InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 22.Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kellehear A (2007) A social history of dying. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- 28.Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K et al (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manag 34(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Slort W, Blankenstein AH et al. (2011) Facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients and end-of-life consultants. Br J Gen Pract :167–172Google Scholar
- 30.Benkel I, Wijk H, Molander U (2014) Challenging conversations with terminally ill patients and their loved ones: strategies to improve giving information in palliative care. SAGE Open MedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 34.Patton MQ Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34((5) Part II):1189–1208Google Scholar
- 35.WHO. WHO definition of Palliative Care. [Internet] Available from http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/