Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 4901–4911 | Cite as

Prevalence of cancer chemotherapy-related problems, their relation to health-related quality of life and associated supportive care: a cross-sectional survey

  • Richard Wagland
  • Alison Richardson
  • Sean Ewings
  • Jo Armes
  • Elaine Lennan
  • Matthew Hankins
  • Peter Griffiths
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the treatment-associated problems that most impact on patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy, how problems relate to experiences of supportive care and variations in experience between cancer treatment centres.

Methods

A survey administered to patients at six cancer centres in England explored variations of prevalence of 17 cancer chemotherapy-associated problems and associated supportive care. Problem items were identified as the most frequently experienced and severe when experienced in a scoping and consensus exercise. A health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure, the EQ5D, was included to measure impact of problems.

Results

A total of 363 completed questionnaires were returned (response rate 43 %, median 61 %). The most prevalent problem was ‘tiredness/fatigued’ (90 %), followed by ‘changes in taste & smell’ (69 %) and ‘difficulty managing everyday tasks’ (61 %). Significant variations in problem prevalence existed between centres, and some common problems were rarely reported in the literature. Regression analysis found that almost all problems were significantly associated with HRQoL, with social/emotional problems having as much impact on HRQoL as physical/psychological side effects of treatment. Greatest effect size was for difficulty managing everyday tasks. Respondents reported significant variations in supportive care between centres, with more supportive care received for physical/psychological problems than for social/emotional problems. Findings indicated that patients who received increased supportive care experienced less severe problems.

Conclusion

The most common and distressing chemotherapy-associated problems were identified. These problems are mitigated by quality supportive care. Routine measurement and monitoring of problem items and supportive care are warranted to facilitate benchmarking and service improvements both within and between cancer centres.

Keywords

Cancer Supportive care Treatment-associated problems Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the National Cancer Action Team (NCAT). We would like to thank all the patients and staff at each of the six cancer centres who participated and made this project possible. In particular, we would like to thank the staff members who coordinated the distribution and collection of the pilot survey questionnaires: Michael Flynn, Bernie Wilson, Jeanette Ribton, Belinda Mills and Amanda Tonge. We would also like to thank Geoff Pike of Employment Research Ltd. for assisting with analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All data remains the property of the authors, and results were not subject to approval by any funding body.

References

  1. 1.
    Systematic Anti-Cancer Therapy Chemotherapy Dataset 2015 http://www.chemodataset.nhs.uk/home (accessed 20/10/2015).
  2. 2.
    Brédart A, Kop L-J, Efficace F, Beaudeau A, Brito T, Dolbeault S, Aaronson N, EORTC Quality of Life Group (2014) Quality of care in the oncology outpatient setting from patients’ perspective: a systematic review of questionnaires’ content and psychometric performance. Psycho-Oncology. doi: 10.1002/pon.3661. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson DE, Mooney D, Peterson S (2007) Patients experiences with ambulatory cancer care in British Columbia, 2005/06. University of British Columbia Health Services and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arraras JI, Illarramendi JJ, Viudez A, Lecumberri MJ, de la Cruz S, Hernandez B, Zarandona U, et al. (2012) The cancer outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire for chemotherapy, OUTPATSAT35 CT: a validation study for Spanish patients. Support Care Cancer 20:3269–3278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleeberg UR, Tews JT, Ruprecht T, Hoing M, Kuhlmann A, Runge C (2005) Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC study. Support Care Cancer 13:303–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turhal NS, Efe B, Gumus M, Aliustaoglu M, Karamanoglu A, Sengoz M (2002) Patient satisfaction in the outpatients’ chemotherapy unit of Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey: a staff survey. BMC Cancer 2:30–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCaughan EM, Thompson KA (2000) Information needs of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a day-case unit in Northern Ireland. J Clin Nurs 9:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wagland R, Richardson A, Armes J, Hankins M, Lennan E, Griffiths P (2014) Treatment-related problems experienced by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a scoping review. Eur J Cancer care. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12246. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armes J, Griffiths P, Richardson A, Wagland R, Finnegan-John J, Corner J (2011) Developing and feasibility testing of nurse sensitive outcome measures for ambulatory cancer chemotherapy. Eur J of Cancer Care 47:S296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Ackland S (1999) The physical and psycho-social experiences of patients attending an outpatient medical oncology department: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care 8:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services 2002 Definitions of supportive and palliative care: a consultation paper national council for hospice and specialist palliative care servicesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J (1993) Through the patient’s eyes. Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2003) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2008) Distress management clinical practice guidelines. J. Natl Compr Cancer Netw 1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell T (2007) The social and emotional toll of chemotherapy – patients’ perspectives. Eur. J. Cancer Care 16:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCarthy B, Andrews T, Hegarty J (2014) Emotional resistance building: how family members of loved ones undergoing chemotherapy treatment process their fear of emotional collapse. J Adv Nurs 71(4):837–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shewbridge A, Wiseman T, Richardson A (2012) Working while receiving chemotherapy: a survey of patients’ experiences and factors that influence these. Eur J Cancer Care 21:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farrell C, Heaven C, Beaver K, Macguire P (2005) Identifying the concerns of women undergoing chemotherapy. Patient Educ Couns 56:72–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Dreyer NA, Yeun MY, Yu E, Zhaohui S, Mun Y, Sloan JA, Cleeland CS (2012) Patient reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the VIRGO observational cohort study (OCS). J Clin Oncol 28:6138Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Griffiths P, Richardson A, Blackwell R (2012) Outcomes sensitive to nursing service quality in ambulatory cancer chemotherapy: systematic scoping review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16(3):238–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hjörleifsdóttir E, Hallberg IR, Gunnarsdóttir ED (2010) Satisfaction with care in oncology outpatient clinics: psychometric characteristics of the Icelandic EORTC IN-PATSAT32 version. J Clin Nurs 19:1784e1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mort D, Lansdown M, Smith N (2008) For better, for worse? A review of the care of patients who died within 30 days of receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy (report by the national confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death). NCEPOD.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL (2006) Results of the National Initiative for cancer care quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol 24:626e634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weingart SN, Price J, Duncombe D, Connor M, Sommer K, Conley KA, Bierer BE, Ponte PR (2007) Patient reported safety and quality of care in outpatient oncology. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33:83–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ekwall E, Ternestedt B-M, Sorbe B, Graneheim UH (2011) Patients’ perceptions of communication with the health care team during chemotherapy for the first recurrence of ovarian cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 53–58.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Black N (2013) Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 346:f167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Group, The EuroQol (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy 16(3):199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support, NHS Improvement. The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Vision. Department of Health, 2010. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_111230 (accessed 20 Sept 2015).
  30. 30.
    Griffiths P, Simon M, Richardson A, Corner J (2013) Is a larger specialist nurse workforce in cancer care associated with better patient experience? Cross-sectional study. J Health Serv Res Policy 18(25):39–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    NHS England (2014) GP Patient Survey http://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/2015/01/08/gp-patient-survey-2014/ (accessed May 25 2015).
  32. 32.
    AM G, Butow PN, Coates AS, Childs AM, Ellis PM, Dunn SM, Tattersall MHN (1996) On the receiving end V: patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993. Ann Oncol 7:189–195Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, Germanaud J, Thuillier A, Khayat D (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 95:155–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jones R, Regan M, Ristevski E, Breen S (2011) Patients’ perception of communication with clinicians during screening and discussion of cancer supportive needs. Patient Educ Couns 85:e2009–ee215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grigis A, Boyes A (2005) Proactive routine monitoring and intervention to reduce psychosocial impact of cancer therapy. Clin Psychol 9:70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Geling O, Hansen M, Cruciani G, Daniele B, De Pouvourville G, Rubenstein EB, Daugaard G (2004) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics: perception versus reality. Cancer 100:2261–2268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liau C-T, Chu N-M, Liu H-E, Deuson R, Lien J, Chen J-S (2005) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Taiwan: physicians’ and nurses’ estimation vs. patients’ reported outcomes. Support Care Cancer 13:277–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fincham L, Copp G, Caldwell K, Jones L, Tookman A (2005) Supportive care: experiences of cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 9:258–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Griffiths P, Maben J, Murrells T (2011) Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: observational study using routinely collected data. Int J Nurs Stud 48(10):1199–1210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    King M, Jones L, McCarthy O, Rogers M, Richardson A, Williams R, Tookman A, Nazareth I, et al. (2008) Development and pilot evaluation of a complex intervention to improve experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 100(2):274–280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shilling V, Jenkins V, Morris R, Deutsch G, Bloomfield D (2005) The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on cognition in women with breast cancer – preliminary results of an observational longitudinal study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 14:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schagen SB, Boogerd W, Muller MJ, Huinink WTB, Moonen L, Meinhardt W, Van Dam FSAM (2008) Cognitive complaints and cognitive impairment following BEP chemotherapy in patients with testicular cancer. Acta Oncol 47:63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cooley ME, Short TH, Moriarty HJ (2003) Symptom prevalence, distress, and change over time in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology 12:694–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sun CC, Bodurka DC, Weaver CB, Rasu R, Wolf JK, Bevers MW, Smith JA, Wharton JT, Rubenstein EB (2005) Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 13:219–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health Sciences, HighfieldUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Health ScienceUniversity of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
  3. 3.Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Faculty of Social, Human and Mathematical Sciences, HighfieldUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & MidwiferyKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations