Predictors of quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors up to 5 years after end of treatment: a cross-sectional survey
- First Online:
- 457 Downloads
This study aimed to assess quality of life (QoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and determine factors predictive of poor QoL in the first 5 years after the end of treatment.
A cross-sectional survey, including the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) measure, was sent to HNC survivors in three Scottish health regions, with responses linked to routinely collected clinical data. Independent sample t tests, ANOVAs, Pearson correlations and multiple hierarchical regressions were used to explore associations between and to determine the contribution made by demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors to predicting ‘generic’ and ‘cancer-specific’ quality of life.
Two hundred eighty patients (65 %) returned questionnaires. After adjustment, multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower socio-economic status, unemployment and self-reported comorbidity independently contributed to poorer generic and cancer-specific quality of life. In addition to these factors, having had a feeding tube or a diagnosis of oral cavity cancer were independently predictive of poorer cancer-specific quality of life.
Socio-economic factors and comorbidity are important predictors of QoL in HNC survivors. These factors and the detrimental long-term effects of feeding tubes need further attention in research and practice.
KeywordsQuality of life Head and neck cancer Survivors Socio-economic status Feeding tube
- 1.Mehanna H, Jones T, Gregoire V, Ang K (2010) Oropharyngeal carcinoma related to human papillomavirus. BMJ 340Google Scholar
- 2.NHS Scotland (2012) Cancer in Scotland. In.: Information Services Division, NHS National Services ScotlandGoogle Scholar
- 3.NHS Scotland (2010) Cancer of the head and neck: Incidence and mortality by deprivation category. In.: Information Services Division, NHS ScotlandGoogle Scholar
- 5.Statement from director of the National Cancer Research Network in response to a parliamentary question concerning the findings of the 2012 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey [http://ncrndev.org.uk/downloads/MiscDocs/3.2.12%20Overview%20from%202012%20NCPES.pdf]
- 6.Oral Cancer: UK incidence statistics [http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/oral/incidence/index.htm]
- 20.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2012) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: distress management (Version 2.2013)Google Scholar
- 25.Robertson G, Greenlaw N, Steering Group Committee for the Scottish Audit of Head and Neck Cancers, Bray C, Morrison D (2010) Explaining the effects of socio-economic deprivation on survival in a national prospective cohort study of 1909 patients with head and neck cancers. Cancer Epidemiol 34:682–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2006) Diagnosis and management of head and neck cancer. A national clinical guideline. Network SIG, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- 38.Potash AHL, Christensen AJ, Vander Weg M, Funk GF (2009) Continued alcohol use in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 32:905–912Google Scholar