A randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of a 12-week supervised exercise versus usual care on outcomes in haematological cancer patients
Following treatment, haematological cancer (HEM) patients exhibit significant physical deconditioning and psychological distress. Exercise has been shown as a clinically effective and safe intervention for cancer patients, with the potential to reverse the deleterious effects following treatment. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of a 12-week exercise rehabilitation on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and associated outcomes in HEM patients post-treatment.
Patients with a HEM were recruited to participate in a 12-week exercise rehabilitation intervention post-treatment. Pre-, post- and follow-up assessments were conducted on outcome measures including CRF, quality of life (QoL), psychological distress, cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength (MS) and body composition. Patients were given tailored exercise programmes comprising aerobic and resistance exercises, carried out three times per week for 12 weeks in local gyms and clinics. Usual-care participants were offered a delayed, tailored 12-week exercise intervention after the initial study period.
Thirty-seven patients (49 % recruitment rate) were randomly assigned to the 12-week exercise rehabilitation (n = 18) or usual care (n = 19) with a 91 % adherence to the exercise intervention. Following the exercise programme, significant improvements were seen in CRF (p = 0.01), cardiovascular fitness (p ≤ 0.001), QoL (p ≤ 0.001), MS (p ≤ 0.001) and body composition (p = 0.001), with moderate to large effects for all primary outcomes. Patient follow-up at 24 weeks demonstrated outcome maintenance in the exercise rehabilitation group and significant improvements in outcomes in usual-care patients following participation in a delayed exercise programme. There were no adverse reactions or study withdrawals.
A 12-week exercise rehabilitation programme resulted in significant statistical (p ≤ 0.05) and clinical improvements in CRF and additional outcomes in HEM patients following treatment. Additionally, a 12-week delayed exercise programme showed similar significant improvements in patient outcomes.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000450213.
KeywordsFatigue Exercise Quality of life Haematological cancer Physical function Supportive care
- 3.American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts & figures 2012. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 5.American Cancer Society (2011) Global cancer facts & figures, 2nd edn. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Liu RD, Chinapaw MJM, Huijgens PC, van Mechelen W (2009) Physical exercise interventions in haematological cancer patients, feasible to conduct but effectiveness to be established: a systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 35:185–192. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Telford RD, Minikin B, Hahn AG (1989) A simple method for the assessment of general fitness: the tri-level profile. Aust J Sci Med Sport 21:6–9Google Scholar
- 26.Borg G (1982) Psychophysical basis of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exer 14:377–381Google Scholar
- 27.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. xxi–567Google Scholar
- 28.Galvão DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N et al (2010) Combined resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:340–347. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2488 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Ackland TR, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J et al (2012) Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission. Sports Med 42:227–249. doi:10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Grove JR, Jackson B, Longbottom J-L, Medic N (2011) Distinguishing between positive and negative exercise habits. Handbook of applied topics in health psychologyGoogle Scholar