Pre-transplant arm muscle area: a simple measure to identify patients at risk
This study aims to explore parameters of nutritional assessment and food intake as predictors of clinical outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).
The study was conducted retrospectively with 56 adult patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Energy and protein daily intake were used to calculate the energy and protein cumulative deficit. The nutritional assessment tools were weight, body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold (TSF), and arm muscle area (AMA) before HSCT and after HSCT.
Food intake decreased immediately after the transplant and the energy and protein cumulative deficit increased during hospitalization (p < 0.01). Almost 70 % of patients had severe weight loss (greater than 5 %), and the average percentage of weight loss was 8.5 ± 3.9 %. BMI and weight loss percentage were not correlated with the presence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) and mortality within 180 days in this population. On the other hand, correlation was found between the initial (pre-HSCT) AMA equal to or below the 15th percentile, with the presence of acute GVHD (p = 0.024), and mortality within 180 days after HSCT (p = 0.010).
The AMA measured pre-HSCT showed to be a potential predictor of acute GVHD and mortality up to 180 days after transplant in adult patients.
KeywordsNutritional assessment Body composition Food intake Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
The first author was sponsored scholarships by the Ministry of Education (MEC), Brasília, DF, and Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná.
The authors thank the Accredited Multiprofessional Residency, the Nutrition and Dietetic Unit and the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit at the teaching hospital of Federal University of Paraná, as well as and the Department of Nutrition at Federal University of Paraná. The authors also thank Heliz Alves das Neves for her technical support with the patients’ database.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.Sheean PM (2005) Nutrition support of blood or marrow transplant recipients: how much do we really know? Pract Gastroenterol 26:84–97Google Scholar
- 2.Brazil (2008) Nursing interventions for cancer control: a proposal for education service integration (3 ed), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
- 5.Sucak GT, Suyani E, Baysal NA et al. (2012) The role of body mass index and other body composition parameters in early post-transplant complications in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation with busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Int J Hematol 95:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0980-y
- 8.Iestra JA, Fibbe WE, Zwinderman AH, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D (2002) Body weight recovery, eating difficulties and compliance with dietary advice in the first year after stem cell transplantation: a prospective study. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:417–424. doi: 10.1038/sj/bmt/1703375 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Urbain P, Birlinger J, Lambert C, Finke J, Bertz H, Biesalski HK (2013) Longitudinal follow-up of nutritional status and its influencing factors in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:446–451. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Farias CLA, Campos DJ, Bonfin CMS, Vilela RM (2013) Phase angle from BIA as a prognostic and nutritional status tool for children and adolescents undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Nutr 32:420–425. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.003Google Scholar
- 14.Hoffmeister PA, Storer BE, Macris PC, Carpenter PA, Baker KS (2013) Relationship of body mass index and arm anthropometry to outcomes after pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 19:1081–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.04.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.World Health Organization (1995). Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series, Switzerland: WHO, Geneva, n 854Google Scholar
- 17.Frisancho AR (2011) Anthropometric standards: an interactive nutritional reference of body size and body composition for children and adults, 4th edn. The University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gibson RS (2005) Principles of nutritional assessment, 2nd edn. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- 20.NEPA-UNICAMP (2006) Brazilian food database (2 ed), NEPA-UNICAMP, CampinasGoogle Scholar
- 21.Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) (2011) Family budget survey (POF) 2008–2009: nutritional composition tables of food consumed in Brazil. IBGE, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- 22.Harris JA, Benedict FG (1919) Biometric studies of basal metabolism in man. Carnegie Institute of Washington, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 23.Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (2002) Nutrition care criteria, 2 edn. Nutrition Program, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- 34.Wang H, Asavaroengchai W, Yeap BY, Wang MG, Wang S, Sykes M, Yang YG (2009) Paradoxical effects of IFN-gamma in graft-versus-host disease reflect promotion of lymphohematopoietic graft-versus-host reactions and inhibition of epithelial tissue injury. Blood 113(15):3612–3619. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168419 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Bueno ND et al. (2004) O transplante de medula óssea na leucemia mielóide aguda: análise de 80 pacientes transplantados no complexo do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 26(2):84–92. doi: 10.1590/S1516-84842004000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar