Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 667–674 | Cite as

Quality of life across chemotherapy lines in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective single-center observational study

  • Beate MayrbäurlEmail author
  • Johannes M. Giesinger
  • Sonja Burgstaller
  • Gudrun Piringer
  • Bernhard Holzner
  • Josef Thaler
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Palliative chemotherapy in patients with nonresectable advanced colorectal carcinoma is performed to prolong survival, alleviate tumor-associated symptoms, and maintain or improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In this prospective single-center observational study, we assessed HRQOL across the various lines of palliative chemotherapy.

Methods

HRQOL data were acquired using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) questionnaire. The first assessment was performed at the beginning of each chemotherapy line, the second after three cycles, and the third at the end of chemotherapy. Further assessments were conducted during checkups every 3 months in our outpatient unit.

Results

In total, 100 consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma (mean age 66.4 years; 60 % men) treated with palliative chemotherapy were recruited. Generally, QOL deteriorated constantly across time. Physical functioning, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and appetite worsened steadily from first-line chemotherapy to the later treatment phase. Global QOL, emotional functioning, and role functioning improved slightly after the end of first-line chemotherapy, deteriorated during second-line chemotherapy to the level of first-line chemotherapy, and further deteriorated in the later treatment phases. In additional analyses, we found the largest differences between patients with and without a treatment response for pain (19.0 vs. 37.2 points) and appetite loss (17.4 vs. 32.7 points).

Conclusion

The individual QOL domains deteriorated constantly across time. Our data indicate that patients undergoing first- and second-line palliative chemotherapy experience stabilization of global QOL and psychosocial symptoms. We also found that unselected patients who achieved a treatment response had a lower symptom burden and better QOL than did patients with progressive disease.

Keywords

Advanced colorectal cancer Quality of life Palliative chemotherapy Electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bettina Buchbauer Mag, MSc. and Ina Pühringer Mag, MSc for their contribution to the data collection.

Funding

The study was partly funded by the Forschungsförderungsverein Oberösterreichische Krebshilfe, an independent and non-profit association with the aim of cancer research, cancer prevention, and counseling. The funding source had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A, Group EGW (2010) Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v93–v97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV, Sebesta C, Depisch D (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 306(6880):752–755PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Gramont A, Bosset JF, Milan C, Rougier P, Bouche O, Etienne PL, et al. (1997) Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 15(2):808–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, et al. (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355(9209):1041–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, Fuchs CS, Ramanathan RK, Williamson SK, et al. (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(1):23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Mitchell EP, Alberts SR, et al. (2007) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 25(12):1539–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, et al. (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(4):337–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, et al. (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2011–2019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cella DF (1995) Measuring quality of life in palliative care. Semin Oncol 22(2 Suppl 3):73–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aaronson NK (1988) Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured? Oncology 2(5):69–76 64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, et al. (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(16):2938–2947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bennett L, Zhao Z, Barber B, Zhou X, Peeters M, Zhang J, et al. (2011) Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in first- or second-line treatment. Br J Cancer 105(10):1495–1502PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ESMO Guidelines Working Group, Van Cutsem EJ (2007) Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 18(Suppl 2):ii25–ii26Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gehring K, Aaronson NK, Gundy CM, Taphoorn MJ, Sitskoorn MM (2011) Predictors of neuropsychological improvement following cognitive rehabilitation in patients with gliomas. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 17(2):256–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16(1):139–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holzner B, Giesinger JM, Pinggera J, Zugal S, Schopf F, Oberguggenberger AS, et al. (2012) The computer-based health evaluation system (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(1):126PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koeberle D, Saletti P, Borner M, Gerber D, Dietrich D, Caspar CB, et al. (2008) Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced biliary tract cancers receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine: a multicenter, phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. J Clin Oncol 26(22):3702–3708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wintner LM, Giesinger JM, Zabernigg A, Sztankay M, Meraner V, Pall G, et al. (2013) Quality of life during chemotherapy in lung cancer patients: results across different treatment lines. Br J Cancer 109(9):2301–2308PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zabernigg A, Giesinger JM, Pall G, Gamper EM, Gattringer K, Wintner LM, et al. (2012) Quality of life across chemotherapy lines in patients with cancers of the pancreas and biliary tract. BMC Cancer 12:390PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines (1996) American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 14(2):671–679Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Graf W, Pahlman L, Sjoden PO (1994) Quality of life during chemotherapy in patients with symptomatic advanced colorectal cancer. The Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumor Adjuvant Therapy Group. Cancer 73(3):556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Au HJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR, et al. (2009) Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. J Clin Oncol 27(11):1822–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farkkila N, Sintonen H, Saarto T, Jarvinen H, Hanninen J, Taari K, et al. (2013) Health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 15(5):e215–e222Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ganz PA, Gotay CC (2007) Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5063–5069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beate Mayrbäurl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johannes M. Giesinger
    • 2
  • Sonja Burgstaller
    • 1
  • Gudrun Piringer
    • 1
  • Bernhard Holzner
    • 2
  • Josef Thaler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine IVKlinikum Wels-GrieskirchenWelsAustria
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations