Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 3473–3480 | Cite as

Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners

  • Marie-Eve Rouge-Bugat
  • Donia Lassoued
  • Joy Bacrie
  • Nathalie Boussier
  • Jean-Pierre Delord
  • Stéphane Oustric
  • Eric Bauvin
  • Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
  • François Bertucci
  • Pascale Grosclaude
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

General practitioners (GPs) are more and more involved in the treatment of cancer patients but feel not informed enough about anticancer treatments and associated side effects. Better communication with treatment centers is needed. We hypothesized that information sheets could improve communication.

Methods

This prospective, multicentric, and interventionist study aimed at implementing and assessing therapeutic sheets describing the side effects of anticancer drugs used for digestive and gynecological cancers and their recommended management. GPs’ phone interviews were done through three successive phases and two independent cohorts. The first phase (T1; 242 GPs with one patient recently treated) listed their expectations, the second (T2; 158 GPs with one patient beginning treatment) assessed the GPs’ opinion regarding the sheets, and the third (T3; responder GPs 4 months after the start of T2) assessed their usefulness in practice.

Results

In T1, 94 % of GPs declared their need of having information sheets, notably for the management of side effects. Thirty-one one-page sheets were created. In T2, 83.5 % gave a favorable opinion about sheets and 80 % envisaged their use in the case of side effect. In T3, 56 % of GPs whose patient had experienced a side effect had used successfully the sheets for its management, and 21 % of patients with side effect were hospitalized. A strong correlation existed between the use of the sheet by GPs and the hospitalization (OR 7.35 in the case of no use vs use).

Conclusion

The guideline sheets represent a simple and low-cost solution to help GPs managing drugs’ side effects and perhaps decrease the rate of unplanned hospitalizations.

Keywords

General practice Digestive cancer Gynecological cancer Side effects Cancer treatment Guidelines sheets 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Atika Ksakass for her precious help in the shaping of guidelines sheets. We thank Nina Crowte who provided medical writing services on behalf of General Practice Department.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

520_2015_2705_MOESM1_ESM.docx (50 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 50 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belot A, Grosclaude P, Bossard N, Jougla E, Benhamou E, Delafosse P et al (2008) Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1980-2005. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 56(3):159–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grunfeld E, Mant D, Vessey MP, Fitzpatrick R (1995) Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 12(1):60–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roorda C, de Bock GH, van der Veen WJ, Lindeman A, Jansen L, van der Meer K (2012) Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer 20(4):705–714PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M et al (2008) Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 26(14):2272–2277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis RA, Neal RD, Hendry M, France B, Williams NH, Russell D et al (2009) Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views of cancer follow-up: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 59(564):e248–e259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stalhammar J, Holmberg L, Svardsudd K, Tibblin G (1998) Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met? Scand J Prim Health Care 16(3):154–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO (2000) The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care 18(3):143–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zitzelsberger L, Grunfeld E, Graham ID (2004) Family physicians’ perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control. BMC Fam Pract 5:25, 15544701PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McConnell D, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (1999) Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care. Br J Cancer 80(3–4):427–437PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vernant JP, Grunfeld JP (2013) 3rd cancer plan. Rev Prat 63(9):1197–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demagny L, Holtedahl K, Bachimont J, Thorsen T, Letourmy A, Bungener M (2009) General practitioners’ role in cancer care: a French-Norwegian study. BMC Res Notes 2:200PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grunfeld E (2005) Cancer survivorship: a challenge for primary care physicians. Br J Gen Pract 55(519):741–742PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McAvoy BR (2007) General practitioners and cancer control. Med J Aust 187(2):115–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamza S, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Bidan JM, Lepage C, Faivre J (2013) Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(12):2727–2733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Junod B, Zahl PH, Kaplan RM, Olsen J, Greenland S (2011) An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts. BMC Cancer 11:401PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S (2009) Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 27(20):3338–3345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK (2007) Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med 39(7):477–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tardieu E, Thiry-Bour C, Devaux C, Ciocan D, de Carvalho V, Grand M et al (2012) The place of general practitioners in cancer care in Champagne-Ardenne. Bull Cancer 99(5):557–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA (1996) Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Pract 13(3):264–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    James JA, Harris DJ, Mott MG, Oakhill A (1988) Paediatric oncology information pack for general practitioners. Brit Med J 296(6615):97–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kousgaard KR, Nielsen JD, Olesen F, Jensen AB (2003) General practitioner assessment of structured oncological information accompanying newly referred cancer patients. Scand J Prim Health Care 21(2):110–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jenns K (1994) Importance of nausea. Cancer Nurs 17(6):488–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foubert J, Vaessen G (2005) Nausea: the neglected symptom? Eur J Oncol Nurs 9(1):21–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dibble SL, Isreal J, Nussey B, Casey K, Luce J (2003) Delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea in women treated for breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30(2):E40-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Eve Rouge-Bugat
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Donia Lassoued
    • 1
  • Joy Bacrie
    • 1
  • Nathalie Boussier
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Delord
    • 4
  • Stéphane Oustric
    • 1
  • Eric Bauvin
    • 5
  • Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
    • 2
  • François Bertucci
    • 6
  • Pascale Grosclaude
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Département Universitaire de Médecine GénéraleToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Faculté de MédecineUMR 1027 INSERM-UPSToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Registre des Cancers du TarnAlbiFrance
  4. 4.Institut Universitaire du Cancer IUCT-OncopoleToulouseFrance
  5. 5.Réseau Régional de Cancérologie OncomipIUCT-OncopoleToulouseFrance
  6. 6.Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut Paoli-CalmettesMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations