Health-related physical fitness assessment in a community-based cancer rehabilitation setting
- 402 Downloads
Assessment of physical fitness is important in order to set goals, appropriately prescribe exercise, and monitor change over time. This study aimed to determine the utility of a standardized physical fitness assessment for use in cancer-specific, community-based exercise programs.
Tests anticipated to be feasible and suitable for a community setting and a wide range of ages and physical function were chosen to measure body composition, aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, and balance. Cancer Exercise Trainers/Specialists at cancer-specific, community-based exercise programs assessed new clients (n = 60) at enrollment, designed individualized exercise programs, and then performed a re-assessment 3–6 months later (n = 34).
Resting heart rate, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, handgrip strength, chair stands, sit-and-reach, back scratch, single-leg standing, and timed up-and-go tests were considered suitable and feasible tests/measures, as they were performed in most (≥88 %) participants. The ability to capture change was also noted for resting blood pressure (−7/−5 mmHg, p = 0.02), chair stands (+4, p < 0.01), handgrip strength (+2 kg, p < 0.01), and sit-and-reach (+3 cm, p = 0.03). While the submaximal treadmill test captured a meaningful improvement in aerobic fitness (+62 s, p = 0.17), it was not completed in 33 % of participants. Change in mobility, using the timed up-and-go was nominal and was not performed in 27 %.
Submaximal treadmill testing, handgrip dynamometry, chair stands, and sit-and-reach tests were feasible, suitable, and provided meaningful physical fitness information in a cancer-specific, community-based, exercise program setting. However, a shorter treadmill protocol and more sensitive balance and upper body flexibility tests should be investigated.
KeywordsRehabilitation Exercise tests Cancer Physical fitness
- 3.American College of Sports Medicine (2013) ACSM/ACS Certified Cancer Exercise TrainerSM. American College of Sports Medicine. http://certification.acsm.org/acsm-cancer-exercise-trainer. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
- 4.Canadian Physiotherapy Association (2014) Oncology Physiotherapy. Canadian Physiotherapy Association. http://www.physiotherapy.ca/Divisions/Oncology. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
- 5.American Physical Therapy Association (2014) Oncology Section, American Physical Therapy Association. American Physical Therapy Association. http://www.oncologypt.org. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
- 8.Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS (2010) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladephiaGoogle Scholar
- 9.Van Londen GJ, Livesey KM, Lemberskey BC (2012) Breast cancer: never too young for a functional assessment? Oncology 26:1–5Google Scholar
- 10.Hayward R (2014) Rocky Mountain Cancer Exercise Specialist Workshop. University of Northern Colorado. http://www.unco.edu/rmcri/cancer_ex_spec_workshop.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
- 11.Pescatello LS, Arena R, Riebe D, Thompson PD (2014) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th edn. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rikli RE (1999) Functional fitness normative scores for community residing older adults ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act 7:162–181Google Scholar
- 17.Swain DP (2014) ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Jones CJ, Rikli RE (2002) Measuring functional fitness in older adults. J Act Aging 1:24–30Google Scholar
- 33.Rikli RE, Jones CJ (1999) Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Act 7:129–161Google Scholar
- 36.Flansbjer U-B, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J (2005) Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 37(2):75–82. doi:10.1080/16501970410017215