Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 23, Issue 8, pp 2357–2364 | Cite as

Aiding a reassertion of self: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of women with ovarian cancer receiving long-term nurse-led telephone follow-up

  • Anna CoxEmail author
  • Sara FaithfullEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study explored the views and experiences of women following treatment for ovarian cancer who had received long-term (at least 3 years) nurse-led telephone follow-up. Exploring the long-term experiences of follow-up for women with ovarian cancer provides important information regarding the coping processes of cancer survivors that can inform the development of innovative and patient-centred approaches of cancer follow-up.

Methods

This is a qualitative study approach using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Eleven women were identified by a clinical nurse specialist as having received nurse-led telephone follow-up for a period of at least 3 years. These women were interviewed in person or over the telephone using a semi-structured interview schedule; interviews were audio-recorded and transcriptions were analysed using IPA.

Results

Nurse-led telephone follow-up was felt to support a reassertion of self and a rejection of patient identity. Three core themes emerged regarding the positive impact of nurse-led telephone follow-up: ‘Somebody was looking out for me’ highlights the perception of increased psychosocial support; ‘It’s just reassurance’ includes both the deep trust in the expertise of the nurse and the reassurance of the continued blood tests; and ‘Time was never an issue’ presents the perception of relaxed follow-up appointments with time to talk and the perceived practical benefits of this approach.

Conclusions

Nurse-led telephone follow-up was broadly recommended for women following treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly for those later on in the survivorship trajectory when focus may move from biomedical aspects of cure to holistic approaches to well-being. Remote interventions which provide a perception of a consistent and constant source of medical and psychosocial support may support adaption to cancer survivorship by enabling a reassertion of self and a rejection of patient identity.

Keywords

Nurse-led telephone follow-up Ovarian cancer Adaption Survivorship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the key contribution of the Clinical Nurse Specialist who assisted us with recruitment and thank all of the women who participated in this study. This study was funded by a pump priming grant at the University of Surrey.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this paper have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Macmillan Cancer Support, Throwing light on the consequences of cancer and its treatment. 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Cancer Survivorship Initiative, Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cancer Research UK. Ovarian cancer Key Facts. 2014; Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/keyfacts/ovarian-cancer/
  4. 4.
    Beesley V et al (2008) Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services. Psychooncology 17(4):392–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hodgkinson K et al (2007) Long-term survival from gynecologic cancer: psychosocial outcomes, supportive care needs and positive outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 104(2):381–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naus M et al (2009) Cancer survivor adaptation model: conceptualizing cancer as a chronic illness. J Clin Psychol 65(12):1350–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCabe MS et al (2013) Survivorship programs and care planning. Cancer 119:2179–2186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leeson S et al (2013) Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK. BMJ Ope 3(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002859
  9. 9.
    Cox A et al (2008) Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12(5):412–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knott V et al (2012) A grounded theory approach to understand the cancer-coping process. Br J Health Psychol 17(3):551–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith JA, Larkin M, Flowers P (2009) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. SAGE Publications, Limited, London, p 232Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandsund C et al (2012) Finding a new normal: a grounded theory study of rehabilitation after treatment for upper gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancers—the patient’s perspective. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 22(2):232–244. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12016
  13. 13.
    Beaver K, Williamson S, Chalmers K (2010) Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses. J Clin Nurs 19(19–20):2916–2924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pennery E, Mallet J (2000) A preliminary study of patients’ perceptions of routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 4(3):138–145, discussion 146-7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCann L et al (2009) Patients’ perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 18(2):156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cox A et al (2011) The acceptability of e-technology to monitor and assess patient symptoms following palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Palliat Med 25(7):675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armes J et al (2009) Patients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol 27(36):6172–6179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mallinckrodt B, Armer J, Heppner P (2012) A threshold model of social support, adjustment, and distress after breast cancer treatment. J Couns Psychol 59(1):150–160PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lutgendorf SK et al (2012) Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(23):2885–2890PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations