Cancer survivors’ perceived need for supportive care and their attitude towards self-management and eHealth
- 2k Downloads
The aim of this study was to explore the perceived need for supportive care including healthy lifestyle programs among cancer survivors, their attitude towards self-management and eHealth, and its association with several sociodemographic and clinical variables and quality of life.
A questionnaire on the perceived need for supportive care and attitude towards self-management and eHealth was completed by 212 cancer survivors from an online panel.
Highest needs were reported regarding physical care (66 %), followed by healthy lifestyle programs (54 %), social care (43 %), psychological care (38 %), and life question-related programs (24 %). In general, cancer survivors had a positive attitude towards self-management and eHealth. Supportive care needs were associated with male gender, lower age, treatment with chemotherapy or (chemo)radiation (versus surgery alone), hematological cancer (versus skin cancer, breast cancer, and other types of cancer), and lower quality of life. A positive attitude towards self-management was associated with lower age. A more positive attitude towards eHealth was associated with lower age, higher education, higher income, currently being under treatment (versus treatment in the last year), treatment with chemotherapy or (chemo)radiation (versus surgery alone), prostate and testicular cancer (versus hematological, skin, gynecological, and breast cancer and other types of cancer), and lower quality of life.
The perceived need for supportive care including healthy lifestyle programs was high, and in general, cancer survivors had a positive attitude towards self-management and eHealth. Need and attitude were associated with sociodemographic and clinical variables and quality of life. Therefore, a tailored approach seems to be warranted to improve and innovate supportive care targeting cancer survivors.
KeywordsSupportive care Self-management eHealth Cancer survivors
We would like to thank Lonneke Gijsbers and Madeleine Wallien (Motivaction) for their contribution in drafting the study-specific questionnaires and in the data collection. This study is supported by a grant from Achmea Healthcare Foundation (SAG).
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
- 7.Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Devillé W, et al (2010) The Netherlands: Health Syst Rev 2010. Report No.: 12Google Scholar
- 11.Emmons KM, Puleo E, Sprunck-Harrild K, Ford J, Ostroff JS, Hodgson D et al (2013) Partnership for health-2, a web-based versus print smoking cessation intervention for childhood and young adult cancer survivors: randomized comparative effectiveness study. J Med Internet Res 15:e218CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bjoernes CD, Laursen BS, Delmar C, Cummings E, Nøhr C (2012) A dialogue-based web application enhances personalized access to healthcare professionals—an intervention study. BMC Med Informat Decis Making 12Google Scholar
- 33.Verweij A (RIVM) Onderwijsdeelname: Indeling opleidingsniveau. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid Bilthoven: RIVM, 2008Google Scholar
- 45.van der Vaart R, van Deursen AJAM, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, van Dijk JAMG, van de Laar MAFJ (2011) Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations. J Med Internet Res 13:e86CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar