Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1341–1347 | Cite as

Evolution of nutritional status in patients with autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

  • Romina L. Barritta de Defranchi
  • Andrea Bordalejo
  • Inés Cañueto
  • Angeles Villar
  • Elizabet Navarro
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the nutritional status in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in three different defined moments: at admission to the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit (BMTU), at discharge from the BMTU and at follow-up. We hypothesized that nutrition status declines during hospitalization and recovers at follow-up.

Methods

Prospective cohort study. Nutritional status was determined using the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) at three different defined moments: T1, defined as the time of admission to the BMTU; T2, at the time of discharge from the BMTU; and T3, at follow-up appointment 10 days after discharge. PG-SGA score differences were described among T1, T2, and T3. Participants were adults admitted for any type of HSCT to our BMTU from March 2010 to July 2013. One hundred and twenty-three patients were included.

Results

Subjects (94.3 %) were well nourished at T1, but 59.7 % were classified as malnourished at T2. PG-SGA score was 3.39 (±3.47) at T1, 12.3 (±5.6) at T2, and 6.54 (±4.57) at T3 (p < 0.001). During hospitalization, nutritional status deteriorated more in men than women (10.59 vs. 7.93; p = 0.002), in patients with length of hospital stay greater than 21 days (10.64 vs. 8.45, p = 0.034), in patients younger than 60 years (10.7 vs. 6.42; p = 0.0007), and those individuals with allogeneic transplant (12.45 vs. 8.74; p = 0.0152).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing HSCT were well nourished upon admission to the BMTU. Nutritional status significantly declined during hospitalization and improved at follow-up. However, nutritional intervention may still be required.

Keywords

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant Patient-generated subjective global assessment PG-SGA Changes in nutrition status Bone marrow transplant 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Sheean PM (2005) Nutrition support of blood or marrow transplant recipients: How much do we really know? Pract Gastroenterol 26: 84–97. http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/medicine/divisions/digestive-health/nutrition-support-team/nutrition-articles/0405-newsletter.pdf. Accesed January 23, 2014
  2. 2.
    Mesejo Arizmendi A, Solano Vercet C, Plaza Poquet V, Garcia-Conde Bru J Soporte Nutricional en el trasplante de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas. Chapter XVIII pp 235–247. Soporte Nutricional en el Paciente Oncológico. http://www.seom.org/seomcms/images/stories/recursos/infopublico/publicaciones/soporteNutricional/pdf/cap_18.pdf. Accesed January 23, 2014
  3. 3.
    Horsley P, Bauer J, Gallagher B (2005) Poor nutritional status prior to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is associated with increased length of hospital stay. Bone Marrow Transplant 35(11):1113–1116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hadjibabaie M, Iravani M, Taghizadeh M, Ataie-Jafari A, Shamshiri AR, Mousavi SA, Alimoghaddam K, Hosseini S, Ghavamzadeh A (2008) Evaluation of nutritional status in patients undergoing hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 42(7):469–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Blanc K, Ringdén O, Remberger M (2003) A low body mass index is correlated with poor survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 88(9):1044–1052PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muscaritoli M, Conversano L, Cangiano C, Capria S, Laviano A, Arcese W, Rossi FF (1995) Biochemical indices may not accurately reflected changes in nutritional status after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Nutrition 11(5):433–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M (2005) Use of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(8):779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isenring EA, Bauer JD, Capra S (2007) Nutrition support using the American dietetic association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice. J Am Diet Assoc 107(3):404–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library Available for Academy members at: http://andevidencelibrary.com/conclusion.cfm?conclusion_statement_id=251792&highlight=PGSGA&home=1. Accesed on: January 5, 2014
  10. 10.
    So EJ, Lee JS, Kim JY (2012) Nutritional intake and nutritional status by the type of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Nutr Res 1(1):3–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hung YC, Bauer J, Horsley P, Waterhouse M, Bashford J, Isenring E (2013) Changes in nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and physical activity levels of cancer patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer 21(6):1579–1586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aballay LR, Eynard AR, del Díaz MP, Navarro A, Muñoz SE (2013) Overweight and obesity: a review of their relationship to metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in South America. Nutr Rev 71(3):168–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleming DR, Rayens MK, Garrison J (1997) Impact of obesity on allogeneic stem cell transplant patients: a matched case-controlled study. Am J Med 102(3):265–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coghlin Dickson TM, Kusnierz-Glaz CR, Blume KG, Negrin RS, Hu WW, Shizuru JA, Johnston LL, Wong RM, Stockerl-Goldstein KE (1999) Impact of admission body weight and chemotherapy dose adjustment on the outcome of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 5(5):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meloni G, Proia A, Capria S, Romano A, Trapé G, Trisolini SM, Vignetti M, Mandelli F (2001) Obesity and autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 28(4):365–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Urbain P, Birlinger J, Lambert C, Finke J, Bertz H, Biesalski HK (2013) Longitudinal follow-up of nutritional status and its influencing factors in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):446–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paiva SI, Borges LR, Halpern-Silveira D, Assuncao MC, Barros AJ, Gonzalez MC (2011) Stardardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(2):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vigano AL, di Tomasso J, Kilgour RD, Trutschnigg B, Lucar E, Morais JA, Borod M (2014) The abridged patient-generated subjective global assessment is a useful tool for early detection and characterization of cancer cachexia. J Acad Nutr Diet 114(7):1088–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barton AD, Beigg CL, Macdonald IA, Allison SP (2000) High food wastage and low nutritional intakes in hospital patients. Clin Nutr 19(6):445–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonçalves TL, Benvegnú DM, Bonfanti G (2009) Specific factors influence the success of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Oxidative Med Cell Longev 2(2):82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Romina L. Barritta de Defranchi
    • 1
  • Andrea Bordalejo
    • 1
  • Inés Cañueto
    • 1
  • Angeles Villar
    • 1
  • Elizabet Navarro
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dietetics DepartmentHospital Universitario Sede Saavedra, CEMIC (Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas “Norberto Quirno”)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto Universitario CEMICBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations