“You need something like this to give you guidelines on what to do”: patients' and partners' use and perceptions of a self-directed coping skills training resource
- 529 Downloads
This study aims to report on the acceptability of a self-directed coping skills intervention, called Coping-Together, for patients affected by cancer and their partners, including the strengths and limitations of the intervention design.
This initial version of Coping-Together included a series of four booklets, which aimed to provide practical coping strategies for the day-to-day management of common physical and psychosocial challenges. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients and/or 14 partners. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for content.
Participants endorsed the self-directed format, and the focus of Coping-Together on practical information was a feature that set it apart from other resources. The majority of participants interviewed felt that the proposed coping strategies were “doable”; however, only half of the participants reported learning new coping skills after reading the booklets. Additional benefits of reading the booklets were increasing awareness of challenges to prepare for, giving hope that something can help you “pull through”, providing a sense of normality, connecting patients and partners to people and services, and complementing support received from health professionals. Despite the general acceptability of the intervention, some aspects of its design were criticized, including the workbook-like exercises, expectations about using the resource together, level of guidance provided, and amount of information included. In general, most participants felt that too much negative information was included, whereas more experiential information was desired.
Preliminary evaluation of Coping-Together supported its practical approach and highlighted improvements to enhance its contribution to patient and partner coping.
KeywordsOncology Cancer Coping Qualitative study Self-directed intervention Caregivers Partners
The development and evaluation of Coping-Together was supported by the Clinical Oncological Society of Australia/Sanofi-Aventis, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, Priority Research Centre in Health Behaviour, and The University of Newcastle. Dr Lambert was supported by an NHMRC Research Fellowship (APP1012869) and Prof Girgis is supported by a Cancer Institute New South Wales grant. We are also grateful to all clinicians who helped us recruit participants for this study—Drs Peter Chong, Jon Gani, Brian Draganic, and Charles Douglas. Thank you to the reviewers who have contributed their expertise and time to the development of the Coping-Together booklets, including Dr Jemma Gilchrist, Ms Alyssa White, and Cancer Nurses (cancer care coordinators, breast care nurses, clinical nurse consultants) from the Cancer Care Coordination network, Hunter New England Local Health District.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.
- 6.Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Jacobsen PB, Lederberg MS, Loscalzo MJ, McCorkle R (eds) (2010) Psycho-oncology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lambert S, Kelly B, Girgis A, Boyes A, Cameron A, Adams C, Proietto A (2012) Self-reliance and perception of psycho-oncology service needs among distressed women with gynaecological cancer. Support Care Cancer 20(Suppl 1):s215Google Scholar
- 18.Bodenmann G (1995) A systematic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss J Psychol 54:34–49Google Scholar
- 19.Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- 22.Speziale HJ, Carpenter D (eds) (2003) Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rubin H, Rubin I (2005) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 25.Loiselle CG, Profetto-McGrath J, Polit DF, Beck C (eds) (2007) Canadian essentials of nursing research, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Streubert Speziale H, Carpenter D (2003) Qualitative research in nursing, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 33.Nagler RH, Gray SW, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, DeMichele A, Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC (2010) Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. Patient Educ Couns 81:S54–S62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Miller SM (1995) Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer 76:167–177. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<167::aid-cncr2820760203>3.0.co;2-k PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Campbell MK, Quintiliani LM (2006) Tailored interventions in public health. Where does tailoring fit in interventions to reduce health disparities? Am Behav Sci 49:1–19Google Scholar
- 50.Hopkinson JB, Brown JC, Okamoto I, Addington-Hall JM (2012) The effectiveness of patient-family carer (couple) intervention for the management of symptoms and other health-related problems in people affected by cancer: a systematic literature search and narrative review. J Pain Symptom Manag 43:111–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.01351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Lambert SD, Girgis A, Turner J, McElduff P, Levesque J, Kayser K, Mihalopoulos C, Shih S, Barker D (2013) A parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of a multi-media, self-directed, coping skills training intervention for patients with cancer and their partners: design and rationale. BMJ Open. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003337