Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 3293–3300 | Cite as

Involvement of general practitioners in palliative cancer care: a qualitative study

  • Anne DahlhausEmail author
  • Nicholas Vanneman
  • Andrea Siebenhofer
  • Marie Brosche
  • Corina Guethlin
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

General practitioners play an important role in palliative care for cancer patients. The intensity of care and its medical complexity make palliative care a demanding task for general practitioners. This study explored general practitioners' perceptions of their involvement in palliative cancer care and the constraints they confront.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 German general practitioners. Recruitment occurred by means of purposeful sampling to secure maximum heterogeneity. The interviews were electronically recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results

A number of themes were identified. General practitioners describe being intensely involved in the final phase of their patients' lives. When providing home-based end-of-life care to cancer patients, general practitioners become aware of the limitations in their medical skills and knowledge and their ability to provide round-the-clock care. They find it helpful and satisfying to collaborate with trusted care providers and seek to cooperate with specialized palliative care services for outpatients.

Conclusions

The substantial involvement of general practitioners in end-of-life care for cancer patients pushes them to their limits because of the major time commitment required, and the need for special skills for which they have received no training. It will be a challenge to provide general practitioners with the structural and personal support they need to provide home-based palliative care for their cancer patients at end of life.

Keywords

General practitioner Primary care Palliative care Qualitative Family practice Cancer care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Erika Kojima who conducted two GP interviews. We would like to thank Phillip Elliott who translated the citations and provided helpful comments on the manuscript, and last but not least, we are very grateful to all the GPs who voluntarily participated in our study.

We would also like to thank the German Cancer Aid for funding the study.

Integrity of research and reporting

After consulting the institutional review board of the University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, ethical approval was not required. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid out in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. They have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Schumacher M, Schneider N (2010) Older people at the end of life: delivery of care and needs for improvement from the perspective of bereaved relatives [German]. Palliativmedizin 11(03):123–129. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pastrana T, Jünger S, Ostgathe C, Elsner F, Radbruch L (2008) A matter of definition—key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. Palliat Med 22(3):222–232. doi: 10.1177/0269216308089803 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Groot MM, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Crul BJ, Grol RP (2005) General practitioners (GPs) and palliative care: perceived tasks and barriers in daily practice. Palliat Med 19(2):111–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slort W, Blankenstein AH, Deliens L, van der Horst HE (2011) Facilitators and barriers for GP–patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients, and end-of-life consultants. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):167–172. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X567081 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groot MM, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Verhagen SC, Crul BJ, Grol RP (2007) Obstacles to the delivery of primary palliative care as perceived by GPs. Palliat Med 21(8):697–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rhee JJ, Zwar N, Vagholkar S, Dennis S, Broadbent AM, Mitchell G (2008) Attitudes and barriers to involvement in palliative care by Australian urban general practitioners. J Palliat Med 11(7):980–985. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0251 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van den Block L, Deschepper R, Bossuyt N, Drieskens K, Bauwens S, Van Casteren V, Deliens L (2008) Care for patients in the last months of life: the Belgian Sentinel Network Monitoring End-of-Life Care study. Arch Intern Med 168(16):1747–1754. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1747 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schindler T (2006) Palliative care in Germany [German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 49(11):1077–1086. doi: 10.1007/s00103-006-0068-7
  9. 9.
    Schneider N, Mitchell GK, Murray SA (2010) Palliative care in urgent need of recognition and development in general practice: the example of Germany. BMC Fam Pract 11:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-66 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider N, Engeser P, Behmann M, Kühne F, Wiese B (2011) Specialized outpatient palliative care. The expectations of general practitioners [German]. Schmerz 25(2):166,168–173. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1037-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michiels E, Deschepper R, van der Kelen G et al (2007) The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin. Palliat Med 21(5):409–415. doi: 10.1177/0269216307078503 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitchell GK (2002) How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review. Palliat Med 16(6):457–464. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm573oa CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aabom B, Kragstrup J, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, Støvring H (2005) Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs. Br J Gen Pract 55(518):684–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neergaard MA, Vedsted P, Olesen F et al (2009) Associations between home death and GP involvement in palliative cancer care. Br J Gen Pract 59(566):671–677. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X454133 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomes B, Higginson IJ (2008) Where people die (1974–2030): past trends, future projections, and implications for care. Palliat Med 22(1):33–41. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084606 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen J, Houttekier D, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B et al (2010) Which patients with cancer die at home? A study of six European countries using death certificate data. J Clin Oncol 28(13):2267–2273. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2850 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qual Social Res 1(2):20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development. Continuous city observation – District classifications. Types of cities and communities in Germany [German] http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/StadtGemeindetyp/StadtGemeindetyp_node.html. Accessed 20 July 2013
  19. 19.
    Sisler JJ, Belle Brown J, Stewart (2004) Family physicians' roles in cancer care: survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry. Can Fam Physician 50:889–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dalsted R, Guassora Dorrit A, Thorsen T (2011) Danish general practitioners only play a minor role in the coordination of cancer treatment. Dan Med Bull 58(1):A4222–A4225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mitchell GK, Burridge LH, Colquist SP, Love A (2011) General practitioners' perceptions of their role in cancer care and factors which influence this role. Health Soc Care Community 20(6):607–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01075.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G (2003) Family physician continuity of care and emergency department use in end-of-life cancer care. Med Care 41(8):992–1001. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000078155.78366.5B CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G, Cummings I (2003) Primary care continuity and location of death for those with cancer. J Palliat Med 6(6):911–918. doi: 10.1089/109662103322654794 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borgsteede S, Graafland-Riedstra C, Deliens L et al (2006) Good end-of-life care according to patients and their GPs. Br J Gen Pract 56(522):20–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brueckner T, Schumacher M, Schneider N (2009) Palliative care for older people—exploring the views of doctors and nurses from different fields in Germany. BMC Palliat Care 8:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-8-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Esteva Cantó M, Llobera Cánaves J, Miralles Xamena J, Bauzá Amengual ML (2000) Management of terminal cancer patients: attitudes and training needs of primary health care doctors and nurses. Support Care Cancer 8(6):464–471. doi: 10.1007/s005200000157 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamagishi A, Morita T, Miyashita M et al (2012) Providing palliative care for cancer patients: the views and exposure of community general practitioners and district nurses in Japan. J Pain Symptom Manag 43(1):59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andershed B (2006) Relatives in end-of-life care—part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, January 1999–February 2004. J Clin Nurs 15:1158–1169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weber M, Claus M, Zepf KI, Fischbeck S, Escobar Pinzon LC (2012) Dying in Germany—unfulfilled needs of relatives in different care settings. J Pain Symptom Manag 44(4):542–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hannes K (2011) Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C (ed) Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1 (Updated August 2011). Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Research Methods Group, http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance. Accessed 20 July 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Dahlhaus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicholas Vanneman
    • 1
  • Andrea Siebenhofer
    • 1
  • Marie Brosche
    • 1
  • Corina Guethlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of General PracticeGoethe-University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations