Handgrip strength predicts survival and is associated with markers of clinical and functional outcomes in advanced cancer patients
- First Online:
Handgrip strength (HGS) has been shown to predict survival and is associated with changes in body composition, nutritional status, inflammation, and functional ability in several chronic disease conditions. Whether similar relationships exist between HGS and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer are currently unknown. We evaluated the association between HGS and survival as well as several key markers of body composition (e.g., sarcopenia), subjective performance measures (e.g., quality of life), and muscle strength (e.g., isokinetic torque of the quadriceps) in patients with advanced forms of non-small cell lung and gastrointestinal cancers.
A consecutive cohort of 203 patients with advanced cancer was enrolled and categorized into three HGS percentiles (e.g., ≥50th, 25th, and ≤10th) according to published normative values. Multivariate regression analyses were used to test for independent associations between HGS and survival, sarcopenia, quality of life (QoL), and lower extremity muscle strength as well as key biological markers (e.g., hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein) while controlling for age, gender, cancer diagnosis, treatment (chemotherapy/radiotherapy), medications, and time from diagnosis to assessment.
When compared to HGS ≥50th, patients in the HGS ≤10th percentile had lower BMI (B, −2.5 kg/m2; 95% CI, −4.5 to −0.45), shorter survival (hazard ratio, 3.2; 2.0–5.1), lower hemoglobin (−19.70 g/L; −27.28 to −12.13) and albumin (−4.99 g/L; −7.85 to −2.13), greater occurrence of sarcopenia (odds ratio, 9.53; 1.95–46.55), lower isokinetic torque of the quadriceps at both 60°/s (−30.6 Nm; −57.9 to −3.3) and 120°/s (−25.1 Nm; −46.4 to −3.7), lower QoL (−1.6 on McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire scale; −2.5 to −0.6), higher levels of fatigue (18.8 on Brief Fatigue Inventory scale; 4.7 –32.9), poorer performance status (0.75 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale; 0.34–1.15), lower fat mass (−7.4 kg; −14.4 to −0.5), and lower lean body mass (−6.5 kg; −10.3 to −2.8).
HGS is independently associated with survival and important biological, functional, and quality of life characteristics in advanced cancer patients. Patients presenting with very low percentiles with respect to their handgrip assessment may require timely referral to supportive and/or palliative care services.
KeywordsHandgrip Survival Sarcopenia Quality of life Strength Advanced cancer
- 5.Trutschnigg B, Kilgour RD, Reinglas J et al (2008) Precision and reliability of strength (Jamar vs. Biodex handgrip) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vs. bioimpedance analysis) measurements in advanced cancer patients. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33:1232–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Rantanen I, Era P, Kauppinen M, Heikkinen E (1994) Maximal isometric muscle strength and socio-economic status, health, and physical activity in 75-year-old persons. J Aging Phys Act 2:206–220Google Scholar
- 22.Mathiowetz V (1990) Grip and pinch strength measurements. In: Amundsen LR (ed) Muscle strength testing; instrumented and non-instrumented systems. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 163–177Google Scholar
- 23.Cleeland CS, Wang XS (1999) Measuring and understanding fatigue. Oncology 13:91–97Google Scholar
- 31.SPSS Inc. (2005) SPSS 14.0 for Windows. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- 41.Norman K, Kirchner H, Freudenreich M et al (2008) Three month intervention with protein and energy rich supplements improve muscle function and quality of life in malnourished patients with non-neoplastic gastrointestinal disease—a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr 27:48–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Kisiel-Sajewicz K, Davis MP, Siemionow V et al (2012) Lack of muscle contractile property changes at the time of perceived physical exhaustion suggests central mechanisms contributing to early motor task failure in patients with cancer-related fatigue. J Pain Symp Manag 44:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar