Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 1503–1507

Clinic-based depression screening in lung cancer patients using the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 depression questionnaires: a pilot study

  • J. Michael Randall
  • Rochelle Voth
  • Erin Burnett
  • Lyudmila Bazhenova
  • Wayne A. Bardwell
Short Communication

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to validate the ability to perform depression screening with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 depression modules in a busy, outpatient practice, and to evaluate the prevalence of depression among lung cancer outpatients at our institution.

Methods

In 2010, 64 patients in a thoracic malignancy clinic completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Patients endorsing either one or both items were then given the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a nine-item depression assessment tool. Patients with mild or worse depression were offered a referral to a mental health care provider.

Results

Eighteen of 64 patients (28 %) endorsed one or both items on the PHQ-2. Thirteen of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen completed the PHQ-9, with mean score of 10.2 (SD 3.91), suggesting moderate depression. PHQ-9 item 4, evaluating fatigue, was positive in 12 patients, and PHQ-9 item 9, evaluating suicidal ideation, was never reported. Only 1 of 18 patients with a positive PHQ-2 screen was being followed by a psychiatrist, and no patient accepted a new referral to a mental health provider.

Conclusions

The PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 modules are an effective means of depression screening in a busy, outpatient clinic. A high prevalence of depression was reported; yet, suicidal ideation was not reported. Depression severity ranged from mild to severe. The most endorsed PHQ-9 item was fatigue, although it is uncertain if this reflects a symptom of depression, a sequela of lung cancer itself, or both. The lung cancer patients in this sample who reported depression were unlikely to receive mental health services.

Keywords

Lung cancer Oncology Depression Screening Patient health questionnaire PHQ 

References

  1. 1.
    Massie MJ (2004) Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32:57–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, Meader N (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care setting: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 12:160–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buccheri G (1998) Depressive reactions to lung cancer are common and often followed by a poor outcome. Eur Respir J 11:173–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pirl WF, Greer JA, Traeger L, Jackson V, Lennes IT, Gallagher ER, Perez-Cruz P, Heist RS, Temel JS (2012) Depression and survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: effects of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol 30:1310–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hopwood P, Stephens RJ (2000) Depression in patients with lung cancer: prevalence and risk factors derived from quality-of-life data. J Clin Oncol 18:893–903PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas K, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS (2003) The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R). JAMA 289:3095–3105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2011) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology distress management V.1.2011. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/distress.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2011
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen PB, Shibata D, Siegel EM, Lee J-H, Fulp WJ, Alemany C, Abesada-Terk G, Brown R, Cartwright T, Faig D, Kim G, Levine R, Markham M-J, Schreiber F, Sharp P, Malafa M (2011) Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators. Psychooncology 20:1221–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Passik S, Dugan W, McDonald MV, Rosenfeld B, Theobald DE, Edjerton S (1998) Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1594–1600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Lowe B (2010) The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 32:345–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16:606–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, Gunn J, Kerse N, Fishman T, Falloon K, Hatcher S (2010) Validation of the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. Ann Fam Med 8:348–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phelan E, Williams B, Meeker K, Bonn K, Frederick J, LoGerfo J, Snowden M (2010) A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly. BMC Fam Pract 11:63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams JW, Pigone M, Ramirez G, Perez-Stellato C (2002) Identifying depression in primary care: a literature synthesis of case-finding instruments. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 24:225–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS (1997) Case-finding instruments for depression: two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 12:439–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (2003) The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 41:1284–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ell K, Xie B, Quon B, Quinn D, Dwight-Johnson M, Lee P-J (2008) Randomized controlled trial of collaborative care management of depression among low-income patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4488–4496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fann JR, Berry DL, Wolpin S, Austin-Seymore M, Bush N, Halpenny B, Lober WB, McCorkle R (2009) Depression screening using the patient health questionnaire-9 administered on a touch screen. Psychooncology 18:14–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thekkumpurath P, Walker J, Butcher I, Hodges L, Kleiboer A, O’Connor M, Wall L, Murray G, Kroenke K, Sharpe M (2011) Screening for major depression in cancer outpatients: the diagnostic accuracy of the 9-item patient health questionnaire. Cancer 117:218–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whitney KA, Steiner AR, Lysaker PH, Estes DD, Hanna NH (2010) Dimensional versus categorical use of the PHQ-9 depression scale among persons with non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study including quality-of-life comparisons. J Support Oncol 8:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Adame S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ (2010) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:733–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stone PC, Minton O (2008) Cancer-related fatigue. Eur J Cancer 44:1097–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanders SL, Bantum EO, Owen JE, Thornton AA, Stanton AL (2010) Supportive care needs in patients with lung cancer. Psychooncology 19:480–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walker J, Waters RA, Murray G, Swanson H, Hibberd CJ, Rush RW, Storey DJ, Strong VA, Fallon MT, Wall LR, Sharpe M (2008) Better off dead: suicidal thoughts in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 26:4725–4730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Michael Randall
    • 1
  • Rochelle Voth
    • 2
  • Erin Burnett
    • 1
  • Lyudmila Bazhenova
    • 1
  • Wayne A. Bardwell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry, Patient and Family Support Service, Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations