The attitudes of Korean cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists, and members of the general public toward advance directives
- 769 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate Korean attitudes toward advance directives (ADs) among cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists, and the general public.
A multicenter survey study explored the attitudes of participants to ADs, and hospice–palliative care (HPC) was conducted. A total of 1,242 cancer patients, 1,289 family caregivers, 303 oncologists, and 1,006 members of the general public participated in the survey.
The majority of patients, family caregivers, oncologists, and general public agreed with the necessity of ADs. However, oncologists regard “when became terminal status” as an optimal timing for completion of ADs (52.2 %), while other groups regard earlier periods as it. More than 95 % oncologist answered that cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilator are necessity items for ADs form, while around 70 % of other groups answered so. Multivariate analysis revealed that several factors including agreement with terminal disclosures and a positive attitude toward HPC were independently associated with necessity of ADs.
We found that attitudes toward ADs among cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists, and the general public were significantly different. Our study also suggests that favorable attitudes toward comfort end-of-life care and HPC are keys that influence the perceived need for ADs.
KeywordsAdvance directives Attitude Hospice–palliative care
This work was supported by the 2008 Korean National Cancer Control Program by the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Korea, and partially by grant no. 0710730-3 from the National Cancer Center, Korea.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
- 23.Yun YH, Han KH, Park S, Park BW, Cho CH, Kim S, Lee DH, Lee SN, Lee ES, Kang JH, Kim SY, Lee JL, Heo DS, Lee CG, Lim YK, Choi JS, Jeong HS, Chun M (2011) Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients. CMAJ 183:E673–E679PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Levy PS, Lemeshow LS (2009) Sampling of populations: methods and applications, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 35.Con A (2008) Cross-cultural considerations in promoting advance care planning in Canada. BC Cancer Agency, VancouverGoogle Scholar