In search of the sixth vital sign: cancer care in Romania
Romania still has to adapt and develop psychosocial assessment protocols which would allow standardized screening for the sixth vital sign in cancer patients, namely distress and quality of life. The present study screens for the psychosocial and communication needs of cancer outpatients in palliative care and in rehabilitation. These data are also compared with those obtained from a sample of cancer inpatients.
Subjects for this study were recruited from cancer care services from the Transylvania region in Romania. A total of 203 persons with cancer were included in the screening. Of this number, 68 were in the hospitalized group, 71 were from the rehabilitation group, and 64 were palliative care cases. FACT-G 4.0 and BDI screening instruments were used in these clinical samples. Statistical analysis performed was: associational and comparative statistics, one-way analysis of variance.
Statistically and clinically significant results were found in relation to symptoms of depression, physical and functional well-being, and overall quality of life. However, with regard to psychosocial well-being, there were no clinically relevant or significant differences among cancer patients under hospital treatment, or in rehabilitation and palliative care programs. More than 40 % of the cancer patients included in our pilot screening were not open to talk about their illness and their related needs.
Cancer is an unmet psychosocial challenge to patients and to the specialized services, regardless of care type. The urgency of psychosocial screening in the Romanian cancer care system is revealed. Based on these findings, there is a need for psychosocial screening and related supportive care services that need to be integrated into Romania’s cancer care programs. A recommendation is to pilot psychosocial and supportive care model within the four regional cancer care institutions.
KeywordsDistress Quality of life Cancer care Romania
The author would like to express his greatest gratitude to Arthur Sárosi, Brigitte Mild, Stella Hanusz, and Júlia Vágási for their assistance in screening cancer patients. This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2012-3-0011.
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare. The author has full control of all primary data and thereby he agrees to allow the journal to review data if requested.
- 1.Chawla M, Betcherman G, Banerji A (2007) From red to gray: the “third transition” of aging populations in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. World Bank Publications, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 2.WHO (2008) World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe—European mortality database (MDB). http://data.euro.who.int/hfamdb/. Accessed 2 March 2009
- 3.WHO (2008) World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe—European health for all database (HFA-DB). http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb/. Accessed 2 March 2009
- 5.WHO (2008) Cancer control—knowledge into action: WHO guide for effective programmes. Policy and advocacy. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ministerul Sănătăţii (2010) HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 1388 din 28 decembrie 2010 privind aprobarea programelor naţionale de sănătate pentru anii 2011 şi 2012. Monitorul Oficial al României Partea I, până la 29 martie 2011 http://www.ms.ro/?pag=19&id=9390. Accessed 04 January 2012
- 8.Mateescu D (2010) Ghidul pacientului oncologic. Benett, BucureştiGoogle Scholar
- 9.Centeno C, Clark D, Rocafort J, Flores L, Lynch T, Praill D, De Lima L, Brasch S, Greenwood A, Giordano A (2006) A map of palliative care specific resources in Europe. European Association for Palliative Care, VeneciaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hospice Romania (2008) Campanie nationala de constientizare a problemelor cu care se confrunta pacientii cu boli grave in stadii avansate - Planul de servicii paliative. Hospice Romania. http://www.hospice.ro. Accessed 24 February 2008
- 11.Holland JC, Bultz BD (2007) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5(1):3–7Google Scholar
- 13.Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, Compas B, Dudley MM, Fleishman S, Fulcher CD, Greenberg DB, Greiner CB, Handzo GF, Hoofring L, Jacobsen PB, Knight SJ, Learson K, Levy MH, Loscalzo MJ, Manne S, McAllister-Black R, Riba MB, Roper K, Valentine AD, Wagner LI, Zevon MA (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(4):448–485Google Scholar
- 18.Webster K, Odom L, Peterman A, Lent L, Cella D (1999) The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: validation of version 4 of the core questionnaire. Qual Life Res 604–604Google Scholar
- 21.Nordstokke DW, Zumbo BD (2010) A new nonparametric Levene test for equal variances. Psicológica 2:401–430Google Scholar
- 22.Nordstokke DW, Zumbo BD, Cairns SL, Saklofske DH (2011) The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data. Pract Assess, Res Eval 16(5):2Google Scholar
- 25.Grassi L, Uchitomi Y (2009) Depression and depressive disorders in cancer patients. http://www.ipos-society.org/education/core_curriculum/core_curriculum_en.aspx#. Accessed 18 August 2010
- 32.Pirl WF, Roth AJ (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of depression in cancer patients. Oncol-Huntington 13(9):1293–1300Google Scholar
- 36.Dégi CL (2010) Psychosocial aspects of cancer in hospitalized adult patients http://phd.sote.hu/mwp/phd_live/vedes/export/degilaszlocsaba.m.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2012
- 37.Degi L, Balog P, Kopp M, Kallay E, Thayer J, Csikai E (2010) Depressive symptoms, negative life events and incidence of lifetime treatment of cancer in the Hungarian population. J Cogn Behav Psychother 10(1):39–57Google Scholar
- 42.Holland JC, Kelly BJ, Weinberger MI (2010) Why psychosocial care is difficult to integrate into routine cancer care: stigma is the elephant in the room. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(4):362–366Google Scholar