Online communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use
- 837 Downloads
Online communities have been heralded as one of the most promising health resources on the Internet. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and levels of use of online communities for breast cancer survivors.
Using Google, we identified websites with a string of computer-mediated communication terms and individual queries of three to five words of online community terms. This was complemented by a review of website resource lists and personal libraries. Two reviewers independently extracted information on their general characteristics and number of members and message board posts. A coding scheme guided content analysis.
We found 111 websites. Most sites (n = 64, 65.8 %) had a broad focus (e.g., health, cancer, or general). One third (n = 38, 34.2 %) were exclusive to breast cancer and 11 catered to specific disease characteristics. The majority were American (n = 79, 75.2 %), nonprofit (55.0 %), and moderated (69.5 %). Most moderators (85.7 %) were staff or community members; eight sites were moderated by health professionals. Greater than one-third of sites (n = 40, 36 %) were initiated by breast cancer survivors or loved ones. Breast cancer-specific sites contained a total of 4,186,275 posts. One-third (n = 10) contained 93.4 % of posts, displaying over 100,000 posts each. As of April 3, 2012, eight sites were discontinued.
There is a wide range of online communities available for breast cancer survivors with extensive archives of personal illness experiences. Future efforts should focus on identifying the factors that determine their success and effectiveness.
KeywordsOnline communities Breast cancer Health information Internet Social support
This work is a component of JLB’s PhD thesis at the University of Toronto. JLB has full control over all primary data and agrees to allow the journal to review the data if requested. JLB wishes to acknowledge the guidance of her PhD thesis committee: LE Ferris PhD CPsych LLM (ADR) LLM (Admin Law), J Katz PhD CPsych, and AR Jadad MD DPhil FRCPC. This work was supported by CIHR Strategic Doctoral Fellowships in Health Care, Technology and Place, and Cell Signaling in Mucosal Inflammation and Pain.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Fox S (2011) Social life of health information: Pew Internet and American Life Project, 5/2011. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx
- 3.Statistics Canada (2010) Canada internet use survey: the daily. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110525/dq110525b-eng.htm. Accessed April 6, 2012
- 4.Preece J (2000) Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. Wiley, New WorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bender JL, O'Grady L, Jadad AR (2008) Supporting cancer patients through the continuum of care: a view from the age of social networks and computer-mediated communication. Curr Oncol s107:s42–7Google Scholar
- 10.Shaw B, McTavish F, Hawkins R et al (2009) Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging support over the CHESS network. J Health Commun 5:135–159Google Scholar
- 13.Rogers S, Chen Q (2005) Internet community group participation: psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. J Comp Med Commun 10(4):1Google Scholar
- 15.Hoffman-Goetz L, Clarke JN (2000) Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web. Cdn J Public Health 91(4):281–4Google Scholar
- 18.NetMarketShare.com (2009) Search engine market share for December 2009: http://www.netmarketshare.com/search-engine-market-share.aspx?qprid=4. Accessed December 15, 2009
- 19.Ussery B (2008) Google: average number of words per query have increased: Beu Blog 2008 http://www.beussery.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/google-average-number-of-words-per-query-have-increased/ Accessed December 15, 2009
- 21.Anderson C, The long tail. Wired 2004; October 12:10: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html. Accessed April 15, 2012
- 26.Kairam S, Wang DJ, Leskovec J (2012) The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity. Presented at WSDM, Seattle, Washington, USA Febrary 8–12, 2012Google Scholar
- 36.Bender JL (2011) The web of support: a multi-method study examining the role of online communities as a source of peer-to-peer supportive care for breast cancer survivors: Doctoral Dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar