Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 1013–1023 | Cite as

Randomised controlled trial to determine the benefit of daily home-based exercise in addition to self-care in the management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a feasibility study

Original Article

Abstract

Exercise is considered to be a key aspect of lymphoedema treatment, although there is little evidence for the therapeutic effect of exercise in managing breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL). This small randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed to determine the feasibility, prior to undertaking a larger RCT, of researching a daily home-based exercise programme to treat stable BCRL. An experimental design compared the exercise intervention combined with standard lymphoedema self-care to self-care alone over a 6-month period. Twenty-three women with stable unilateral BCRL of ≥10 % excess limb volume (ELV) were randomly allocated to a daily home-based exercise programme and self-care (n = 11) or self-care measures alone (n = 12). The primary objective was to determine difference in limb volume reduction for the two groups. Secondary objectives were to monitor change in other areas that impact BCRL: quality of life, arm function and range of shoulder movement. All 23 women completed the trial, providing full data for each time point. The intervention group showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in relative ELV at week 26 (95 % confidence interval (CI) −26.57 to −5.12), whereas the control group improvement crossed the line of no effect (95 %CI −17.71 to 1.1). This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a RCT of exercise as a therapeutic intervention in the management of BCRL. Although the sample was small, the results support the findings of other exercise studies which have shown trends towards improvement.

Keywords

Arm swelling Breast cancer Home-based exercise programme Lymphoedema 

Abbreviations

BCRL

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema

ELV

Excess limb volume

%ELV

Relative excess limb volume

IG

Intervention group

CG

Control group

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity and sponsored by Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust. We would like to thank the following people: the patients who provided feedback on the exercise programme during its development; lymphoedema clinical nurse specialists Martine Huit and Sian Thomason (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London) and physiotherapists Barbara Lyle (Western General Hospital, Edinburgh), Saskia Krijsman (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London) and Siobhan McGarry (King’s College Hospital, London) who reviewed the exercise programme; Mairead Griffin, Head of Nursing and Lead Cancer Nurse at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, for her management support; Martine Huit and Siobhan McGarry who kindly reviewed the final draft of this paper; Dr Toby Prevost, Kings College London, who provided statistical advice during the writing of this paper. We wish also to thank Medi UK and BSN Medical UK who provided the compression garments worn during the study. This study complied with the UK Good Clinical Practice guidelines for research and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and no disclosures. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Gartner R, Jensen MB, Kronborg L, Ewertz M, Kehlet H, Kroman N (2010) Self-reported arm-lymphedema and functional impairment after breast cancer treatment—a nationwide study of prevalence and associated factors. Breast 19:506–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman SA, Localio AR, Potashnik SL, Simoes Torpey HA, Kallan MJ, Weber AL, Miller LT, DeMichele A, Solin LJ (2009) Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol 27(3):390–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams AF, Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ (2005) Lymphoedema: estimating the size of the problem. Palliat Med 19:300–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter BJ (1997) Women’s experiences of lymphedema. Oncol Nurs Forum 24(5):875–882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fu MR (2008) Women at work with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. J Lymphoedema 3(1):20–25Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radina ME (2009) Breast cancer-related lymphedema: implications for family leisure participation. Fam Matters 58:445–459Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ridner SH (2005) Quality of life and a symptom cluster associated with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. J Support Care Cancer 13:904–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ridner SH (2009) The psycho-social impact of lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 7(2):109–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tobin MB, Lacey HJ, Meyer L, Mortimer PS (1993) The psychological morbidity of breast cancer-related arm swelling. Cancer 72(11):3248–3252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vassard D, Olsen MH, Zinckernagel L, Vibe-Petersen J, Dalton SO, Johansen C (2010) Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 46:3211–3218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shih YCTS, Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, Perkins GH, Elting LS (2009) Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 27(12):2007–2014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Society of Lymphology (2009) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2009 consensus document of the international society of lymphology. Lymphology 42(2):51–60Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Framework L (2006) International consensus: Best practice for the management of lymphoedema. MEP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foldi E, Foldi M, Weissleder H (1985) Conservative treatment of lymphoedema of the limbs. Angiology 36:171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Browse N, Burnand KG, Mortimer PS, O’Donnell T (2003) Principles of medical and physical treatment. In: Browse N, Burnand KG, Mortimer PS (eds) Diseases of the lymphatics. Arnold, London, pp 167–178Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee TS, Kilbreath SL, Sullivan G, Refshauge KM, Beith JM (2010) Patient perceptions of arm care and exercise advice after breast cancer surgery. Oncol Nurs Forum 37(1):85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Speck RM, Coumeya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH (2010) An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0110-5
  18. 18.
    Schmitz KH (2010) Balancing lymphedema risk: exercise versus deconditioning for breast cancer survivors. Exerc Sports Sci Rev 38(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayes SC, Reul-Hirche H, Turner J (2009) Exercise and secondary lymphedema: safety, potential benefits, and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(3):483–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McClure MK, McClure RJ, Day R, Brufsky AM (2010) Randomized controlled trial of the breast cancer recovery program for women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Am J Occup Ther 64(1):59–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKenzie DC, Kalda AL (2003) Effect of upper extremity exercise on secondary lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol 21(3):463–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moseley AL, Piller NB, Carati CJ (2005) The effect of gentle arm exercise and deep breathing on secondary arm lymphedema. Lymphology 38:136–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, Cheville A, Smith R, Lewis-Grant L, Bryan CJ, Williams-Smith CT, Greene QP (2009) Weight lifting in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. N Engl J Med 361(7):664–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Casley-Smith JR (1999) Exercises for patients with lymphoedema of the arm and a guide to self-massage and hydrotherapy, 6th edn. Lymphoedema Association of Australia, MalvernGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pocock SJ, Simon R (1975) Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 31:103–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leduc A, Caplan I, Lievens P (1981) Traitement physique de l’oedeme du bras. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirai M, Niimi K, Iwata H, Sugimoto I, Ishibashi H, Ota T, Nakamura H (2010) Comparison of stiffness and interface pressure during rest and exercise among various arm sleeves. Phlebology 25:196–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stanton AWB, Northfield JW, Holroyd B, Mortimer PS, Levick JR (1997) Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer©). Lymphology 30:77–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sitzia J, Stanton AWB, Badger C (1997) A review of outcome indicators in the treatment of chronic limb oedema. Clin Rehabil 11:181–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keeley V, Crooks S, Locke J, Veigas D, Riches K, Hilliam R (2010) A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL). J Lymphoedema 5(1):26–37Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B (2009) A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valentine RE, Lewis JS (2006) Intraobserver reliability of 4 physiologic movements of the shoulder in subjects with and without symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1242–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Campbell MJ, Gardner MJ (1988) Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses. BMJ 296:1454–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johansson K, Piller N (2007) Weight-bearing exercise and its impact on arm lymphoedema. J Lymphoedema 2(1):15–22Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim DS, Sim YJ, Jeong HJ, Kim GC (2010) Effect of active resistive exercise on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1844–1848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stanton AWB, Badger C, Sitzia J (2000) Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology 33:122–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Preston NJ, Seers K, Mortimer PS (2008) Physical therapies for reducing and controlling lymphoedema of the limbs. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003141.pub2
  38. 38.
    Fu MR (2005) Breast cancer survivors’ intentions of managing lymphedema. Cancer Nurs 28(6):446–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    National Cancer Survivorship Initiative (2009) NCSI self management support workstream: position paper. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Self-Management-position-paper.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2011
  40. 40.
    Skills for Health (2009) Common core principles to support self care: a guide to support implementation http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_084506.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2011
  41. 41.
    Todd D, Todd J (2007) Impact of implementation intentions on exercise adherence. J Lymphoedema 2(1):38–43Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee TS, Kilbreath SL, Sullivan G, Refshauge KM, Beith JM, Harris LM (2009) Factors that affect intention to avoid strenuous arm activity after breast cancer surgery. Oncol Nurs Forum 36(4):454–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lymphoedema Clinic, Guy’s HospitalGuy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations