Physical activity participation and barriers for people with multiple myeloma
- 577 Downloads
This study aims to examine, for people treated for multiple myeloma, (1) differences between prediagnosis and postdiagnosis levels of physical activity, (2) perceived barriers and likelihood of attending a physical activity program, and (3) factors that influence whether or not respondents are meeting physical activity guidelines.
This was a quantitative cross-sectional study; data were gathered from a larger Australian population-wide survey. Respondents completed the survey in hard copy, online, or over the telephone. Demographic and clinical variables included age, gender, locality, time since diagnosis, and marital status. The Godin Leisure-Time Questionnaire measured physical activity; barriers and likelihood of participating in a physical activity program were assessed using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses.
Of the 229 respondents, 53.1 % were male, 42 % aged 60–69 years, and 75.7 % were married or in a de facto relationship. Participation in physical activity declined significantly from prediagnosis levels. Fatigue, injuries, and pain were the strongest perceived barriers to participation; 41 % reported they were likely to attend an exercise program if offered. Respondents who were sufficiently active before diagnosis were 4.79 times more likely to be sufficiently active posttreatment.
People with multiple myeloma reported very low levels of physical activity across all levels of intensity; however, they were interested in attending a physical activity program. To increase physical activity among people with multiple myeloma, interventions should target perceived barriers with a particular focus on those who were not physically active prior to diagnosis.
KeywordsMultiple myeloma Physical activity Exercise Barriers
We would like to thank Mr. Anthony Steele, General Support Services Manager at the Leukaemia Foundation of Australia, and Ms Mary Plumb, Research Consultant at Sweeney Research, Melbourne, for their assistance with the study. This study was funded by The Leukaemia Foundation of Australia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2010) Cancer in Australia: an overview. AIHW, Cancer series no. 60. Cat. no. CAN 56. Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Battaglini C (2011) Physical activity and hematological cancer survivorship. In: Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM (eds) Physical activity and cancer, recent results in cancer research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 275–304Google Scholar
- 5.Bladé J, Cibeira MT, Fernández de Larrea C, Rosiñol L (2010) Multiple myeloma. Annals of Oncology 21: vii313-vii319Google Scholar
- 7.Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH (2011) Cancer survivors’ exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire–survey. Psycho-Oncology, Published online 6 October 2011Google Scholar
- 9.Carmack Taylor CL, Demoor C, Smith MA, Dunn LA, Basen-Engquist K, Nielsen I, Pettaway C, Sellin R, Massey P, Gritz ER (2006) Active for life after cancer: a randomised trial examining a lifestyle physical activity program for prostate cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 15:847–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Coleman EA, Coon SK, Kennedy RL, Lockhart KD, Stewart CB, Anaissie EJ, Barlogie B (2008) Effects of exercise in combination with epoetin alfa during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Oncol Nurs Forum 35:E53–E61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Department of Health and Aged Care (1999) National physical activity guidelines for adults. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fong DYT, Ho JWC, Hui BPH, Lee AM, Macfarlane DJ, Leung SSK, Cerin E, Chan WYY, Leung IPF, Lam SHS, Taylor AJ, Cheng K-k (2012) Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344Google Scholar
- 19.Godin G, Jobin J, Bouillon J (1986) Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. Can J Pub Health 77:359–361Google Scholar
- 23.Irwin ML, Varma K, Alvarez-Reeves M, Cadmus L, Wiley A, Chung GG, Dipietro L, Mayne ST, Yu H (2009) Randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise on insulin and insulin-like growth factors in breast cancer survivors: the Yale Exercise and Survivorship study. Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Snowden JA, Ahmedzai SH, Ashcroft J, D’Sa S, Littlewood T, Low E, Lucraft H, Maclean R, Feyler S, Pratt G, Bird JM (2011) On behalf of the Haemato-oncology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in H, Forum UKM (2011) Guidelines for supportive care in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 154:76–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Thursfield V, Farrugia H (2011) Cancer in Victoria: statistics and trends 2010. Cancer Council Victoria, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 43.Trinh L, Plotnikoff RC, Rhodes RE, North S, Courneya KS (2011) Physical activity preferences in a population-based sample of kidney cancer survivors. Support Care Canc: 1-9Google Scholar
- 45.Truong PT, Gaul CA, McDonald RE, Petersen RB, Jones SO, Alexander AS, Lim JTW, Ludgate C (2011) Prospective evaluation of a 12-week walking exercise program and its effect on fatigue in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical external beam radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 34:350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar