Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group
- 443 Downloads
The coping styles of five adult men within the context of a cancer-related social support group and their preferences regarding group support were examined.
Considering the paucity of literature on male coping processes within a cancer-related social support group, qualitative methods were employed. Specifically, template analysis was used to analyze the range and quality of coping styles.
In contrast to the commonly cited solitary and emotionally restricted coping qualities associated with the male gender role, an emphasis on seeking connection and emotional support in their coping efforts was discovered. Preferences of group qualities (e.g., participant characteristics and session topics) that emerged included an interest in connection, mixed sex groups, and groups composed of mixed diagnoses.
The findings of this study can contribute to the development of interventions aimed at increasing the effectiveness of male coping in group-focused supportive services in cancer care.
KeywordsCoping Cancer Support group Men Gender role
The authors would like to thank the following institution and people for their support in preparing this manuscript: Gilda's Club International; Andrew Finch, Ph.D.; and Allison Palmberg, BS.
Conflict of interest
The authors have none to declare.
- 23.Gray R et al (1996) Breast cancer and prostate cancer self-help groups: reflections on differences. Psychooncology 5:37–142Google Scholar
- 26.Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–117Google Scholar
- 27.Schwandt TA (2000) Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 189–213Google Scholar
- 30.Schwandt TA (1994) Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 40.Spencer S, Carver CS, Price A (1998) Psychological and social factors in adaptation. Psychooncology:211–222Google Scholar
- 41.Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 42.King N (1998) Template analysis. In: Symon G, Cassell C (eds) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 43.Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 44.Denzin NK (2001) Interpretive interactionism, vol 16. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 46.Jordan JV (1991) Women's growth in connection: writings from the Stone Center. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 48.Nutt RL, Brooks GR (2008) Psychology of gender. In: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds) Handbook of counseling psychology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 49.Scher M (2001) Male therapist, male client: reflections on critical dynamics. In: Brooks G, Good G (eds) The handbook of counseling and psychotherapy approaches for men. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar