Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 591–598 | Cite as

Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients

  • Pascal Jean-Pierre
  • Christopher Fundakowski
  • Enrique Perez
  • Shadae E. Jean-Pierre
  • Ashley R. Jean-Pierre
  • Angelica B. Melillo
  • Rachel Libby
  • Zoukaa Sargi
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer and its treatments are associated with psychological distress that can negatively impact self-perception, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are particularly susceptible to psychological distress. This study involved a cross-validation of the Measure of Body Apperception (MBA) for HNC patients.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-two English-fluent HNC patients between 20 and 88 years of age completed the MBA on a Likert scale ranging from “1 = disagree” to “4 = agree.” We assessed the latent structure and internal consistency reliability of the MBA using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α), respectively. We determined convergent and divergent validities of the MBA using correlations with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), observer disfigurement rating, and patients' clinical and demographic variables.

Results

The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explained 38 % of the variance. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ 2 (28) = 253.64; p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for dimension reduction analysis. The MBA had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.77) and demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validities based on statistically significant moderate correlations with the HADS (p < 0.01) and observer rating of disfigurement (p < 0.026) and nonstatistically significant correlations with patients' clinical and demographic variables: tumor location, age at diagnosis, and birth place (all p s  > 0.05).

Conclusions

The MBA is a valid and reliable screening measure of body apperception for HNC patients.

Keywords

Head and neck cancer Psychological distress Body apperception Psychometrics Measurement development Cancer control Symptom management Quality of life 

Notes

Conflict of interests

None.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures 2012. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines™) Head and neck cancers version 2. 2011. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim TW, Chung MK, Youm HY et al (2011) Bilateral neck metastases in upper aero-digestive tract cancer: emphasis on the distribution of lymphatic metastases and prognostic implications. J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1002/jso.22145
  4. 4.
    Kelder W, Ebrahimi A, Forest VI, Gao K, Murali R, Clark JR (2012) Cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with regional metastases: the prognostic importance of soft tissue metastases and extranodal spread. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):274–279, Epub 2011 Aug 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cole L, Polfus L, Peters ES (2012) Examining the incidence of human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancers by race and ethnicity in the U.S., 1995-2005. PLoS One 7(3):e32657, Epub 2012 Mar 20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polesel J, Franceschi S, Talamini R et al (2011) Tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and the risk of different histological types of nasopharyngeal cancer in a low-risk population. Oral Oncol 47:541–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khariwala SS, Hatsukami D, Hecht SS (2011) Tobacco carcinogen metabolites and DNA adducts as biomarkers in head and neck cancer: potential screening tools and prognostic indicators. Head Neck 25, 10.1002/hed.21705Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lippman SM, Spitz M, Trizna Z, Benner SE, Hong WK (1994) Epidemiology, biology, and chemoprevention of aerodigestive cancer. Cancer 74:2719–2725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sudhoff HH, Schwarze HP, Winder D et al (2011) Evidence for a causal association for HPV in head and neck cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1541–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neilson KA, Pollard AC, Boonzaier AM et al (2010) Psychological distress (depression and anxiety) in people with head and neck cancers. Med J Aust 193:S48–S51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aarstad AK, Beisland E, Osthus AA, Aarstad HJ (2011) Distress, quality of life, neuroticism and psychological coping are related in head and neck cancer patients during follow-up. Acta Oncol 50:390–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dropkin MJ (1999) Body image and quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery. Cancer Pract 7:309–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Callahan C (2004) Facial disfigurement and sense of self in head and neck cancer. Soc Work Health Care 40:73–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen SC, Liao CT, Lin CC, Chang JT, Lai YH (2009) Distress and care needs in newly diagnosed oral cavity cancer patients receiving surgery. Oral Oncol 45:815–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen AM, Jennelle RL, Grady V et al (2009) Prospective study of psychosocial distress among patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:187–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dropkin MJ, Malgady RG, Scott DW, Oberst MT, Strong EW (1983) Scaling of disfigurement and dysfunction in postoperative head and neck patients. Head Neck Surg 6:559–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ (2003) Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck 25:103–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7:117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wills TA (1981) Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin 90:245–271. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood JV (1989) Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin 106:231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cooley CH (1902) Human nature and the social order. Scribner's, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rumsey N, Clarke A, White P (2003) Exploring the psychosocial concerns of outpatients with disfiguring conditions. J Wound Care 12(7):247–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luckett T, Britton B, Clover K, Rankin NM (2011) Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 19(7):871–881, Epub 2011 Mar 4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54(3):216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carr T, Moss T, Harris D (2005) The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 10(Pt 2):285–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alexander AJ, Shrime MG, Gilbert RW, Goldstein DP (2010) Development and preliminary validation of the lip reanimation outcomes questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(3):361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carver CS, Pozo-Kaderman C, Price AA et al (1998) Concern about aspects of body image and adjustment to early stage breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine 60:168–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF (1988) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103:265–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaiser H (1970) A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 35:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kaiser H (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 16:296–298Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res 1:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Airoldi M, Carzaro M, Raimondo L, Pecorari G, Giordano C, Varetto A, Caldera P, Torta R. Functional and psychological evaluation after flap reconstruction plus radiotherapy in oral cancer. Head & Neck. 2011; 458-468. doi:  10.1002/hed.21471.
  38. 38.
    Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ. Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head & Neck. 2003; 103-112. doi:  10.1002/hed.10174

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal Jean-Pierre
    • 1
    • 6
  • Christopher Fundakowski
    • 2
  • Enrique Perez
    • 2
  • Shadae E. Jean-Pierre
    • 4
  • Ashley R. Jean-Pierre
    • 5
  • Angelica B. Melillo
    • 3
  • Rachel Libby
    • 3
  • Zoukaa Sargi
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Saint Joseph’s CollegeRensselaerUSA
  5. 5.Gulliver Preparatory SchoolMiamiUSA
  6. 6.Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations