Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 119–127 | Cite as

How does the Distress Thermometer compare to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among cancer survivors?

  • Allison Boyes
  • Catherine D’Este
  • Mariko Carey
  • Christophe Lecathelinais
  • Afaf Girgis
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Use of the Distress Thermometer (DT) as a screening tool is increasing across the cancer trajectory. This study examined the accuracy and optimal cut-off score of the DT compared to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among adults in early survivorship.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional survey of 1,323 adult cancer survivors recruited from two state-based cancer registries in Australia. Participants completed the DT and the HADS at 6 months post-diagnosis.

Results

Compared to the HADS subscale threshold ≥8, the DT performed well in discriminating between cases and non-cases of anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety–depression with an area under the curve of 0.85, 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. A DT cut-off score of ≥2 was best for clinical use (sensitivity, 87–95 %; specificity, 60–68 %), ≥4 was best for research use (sensitivity, 67–82 %; specificity, 81–88 %) and ≥3 was the best balance between sensitivity (77–88 %) and specificity (72–79 %) for detecting cases of anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety–depression. The DT demonstrated a high level of precision in identifying non-cases of psychological morbidity at all possible thresholds (negative predictive value, 77–99 %).

Conclusions

The recommended DT cut-off score of ≥4 was not supported for universal use among recent cancer survivors. The optimal DT threshold depends upon whether the tool is being used in the clinical or research setting. The DT may best serve to initially identify non-cases as part of a two-stage screening process. The performance of the DT against ‘gold standard’ clinical interview should be evaluated with cancer survivors.

Keywords

Cancer Psychological distress Screening Sensitivity Specificity Survivor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Cancer Survival Study led by Allison Boyes and Afaf Girgis. Funding for this study was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council (ID 252418), Cancer Council NSW, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Honda Foundation and University of Newcastle. The Victorian Cancer Registry (Cancer Council Victoria) and NSW Central Cancer Registry (NSW Department of Health and Cancer Institute NSW) assisted with case recruitment. Our sincere thanks to the cancer survivors who provided the survey data and Alison Zucca for research support.

Conflict of interest

None. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data relating to this paper if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyes AW, Girgis A, D’Este C, Zucca AC (2011) Flourishing or floundering? Prevalence and correlates of anxiety and depression among a population-based sample of adult cancer survivors 6 months after diagnosis. J Affect Disord 135:184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zabora JK, Brintzenhofe-Szoc KM, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Skarstein J, Aass N, Fossa SD, Skovlund E, Dahl AA (2000) Anxiety and depression in cancer patients: relations between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 49:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan T (2000) Depression is a risk factor for non-compliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 160:2101–2107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antoni MH, Lutgendorf SK, Cole SW, Dhabhar FS, Sephton SE, McDonald PG et al (2006) The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 6:240–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fallowfield L, Ratcliffe D, Jenkins V, Saul J (2001) Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 84:1011–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rankin NM, Barron JA, Lane LG, Mason CA, Sinclair S, Bishop JF (2011) Psychosocial oncology services in New South Wales. Aust Health Rev 35:156–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2009) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 17:1117–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centre National Breast Cancer, Initiative National Cancer Control (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, CamperdownGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2010) Distress management V.1.2011. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ et al (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawkes AL, Hughes KL, Hutchison SD, Chambers SK (2010) Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers. BMC Cancer 10:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zabora JR, Smith-Wilson R, Fetting JH, Enterline JP (1990) An efficient method for psychosocial screening of cancer patients. Psychosomatics 31:192–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson J, Jungner G (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Derogatis LR (2000) BSI-18: administration, scoring and procedures manual. National Computer Systems, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Cooper L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC (1998) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer 82:1904–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitchell AJ (2007) Accuracy of Distress Thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders: pooled results from 38 analyses. J Clin Oncol 25:4670–4681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchell AJ (2010) Short screening tools for cancer-related distress: a review and diagnostic validity meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:487–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1464–1488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snowden A, White CA, Christie Z, Murray E, McGowan C, Scott R (2011) The clinical utility of the Distress Thermometer: a review. Br J Nurs 20:220–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merport A, Bober SL, Grose A, Recklitis CJ (2012) Can the Distress Thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors? A comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Support Care Cancer 20:195–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Craike MJ, Livingston PM, Warne C (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of the distress impact thermometer for the detection of psychological distress among CRC survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 29:231–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luckett T, Butow P, King M, Oguchi M, Heading G, Hackl N et al (2010) Choosing outcome measures of anxiety, depression and distress in oncology: a review and recommendations for studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking samples with mixed cancer diagnoses. Support Care Cancer 18:1241–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ziegler L, Hill K, Neilly L, Bennett MI, Higginson IJ, Murray SA et al (2011) Identifying psychological distress at key stages of the cancer illness trajectory: a systematic review of validated self-report measures. J Pain Symptom Manage 41:619–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boyes AW, Girgis A, D’Este CA, Zucca AC (2012) Prevalence and correlates of cancer survivors’ supportive care needs 6 months after diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 12:150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR) (2008) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2008. Cancer series no. 46. AIHW and AACR, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jacobsen P, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora JR, Baker F et al (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 103:1494–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patel D, Sharpe L, Thewes B, Bell ML, Clarke S (2011) Using the Distress Thermometer and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to screen for psychosocial morbidity in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Affect Disord 131:412–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carey M, Noble N, Sanson-Fisher R, Mackenzie L (2011) Identifying psychological morbidity among people with cancer using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: time to revisit first principles? Psychooncology 21:229–238. doi: 10.1002/pon.2057 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vodermaier A, Millman RD (2011) Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 19:1899–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Snaith RP, Zigmond AS (1994) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale manual. NFER Nelson Publishing Co, BerkshireGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Clover K, Carter GL, Mackinnon A, Adams C (2009) Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress. Support Care Cancer 17:1455–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luckett T, Butow P, King MT (2009) Improving outcomes through the routine use of patient reported data in cancer clinics: a critical review. Psychooncology 18:1129–1138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison Boyes
    • 1
  • Catherine D’Este
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mariko Carey
    • 1
  • Christophe Lecathelinais
    • 3
  • Afaf Girgis
    • 4
  1. 1.Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research InstituteNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.Hunter New England Population HealthWallsendAustralia
  4. 4.Ingham Institute for Applied Medical ResearchUniversity of New South WalesLiverpoolAustralia

Personalised recommendations