Outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk febrile neutropenia are effective in children—a systematic review of prospective trials
- 938 Downloads
There is no consensus on whether therapeutic intensity can be reduced safely in children with low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN). Our primary objective was to determine whether there is a difference in efficacy between outpatient and inpatient management of children with low-risk FN. Our secondary objective was to compare oral and parenteral antibiotic therapy in this population.
We performed electronic searches of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and limited studies to prospective pediatric trials in low-risk FN. Percentages were used as the effect measure.
From 7,281 reviewed articles, 16 were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment failure, including antibiotic modification, was less likely to occur in the outpatient setting compared with the inpatient setting (15 % versus 28 %, P = 0.04) but was not significantly different between oral and parenteral antibiotic regimens (20 % versus 22 %, P = 0.68). Of the 953 episodes treated in the outpatient setting and 676 episodes treated with oral antibiotics, none were associated with infection-related mortality.
Based on the combination of results from all prospective studies to date, outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk FN are effective in children and should be incorporated into clinical care where feasible.
KeywordsCancer Children Febrile Meta-analysis Neutropenia
We would like to thank Elizabeth Uleryk for her gracious assistance and expertise in conduct of the literature search. We also would like to acknowledge Rhonda Adams for her administrative assistance.
LS is supported by a New Investigator Award with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 1.Abbas AAH, Felimban SK, Cittana BA et al (2003) Once daily ceftriaxone and amikacin for outpatient treatment of neutropenic fever in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Haema 6(4):501–506Google Scholar
- 9.Cagol AR, Castro Junior CG, Martins MC et al (2009) Oral vs. intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients receiving childhood cancer chemotherapy. J Pediatr (Rio J) 85:531–535Google Scholar
- 14.El-Mahallawy HA, El-Wakil M, Moneer MM, Shalaby L (2011) Antibiotic resistance is associated with longer bacteremic episodes and worse outcome in febrile neutropenic children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:283–288Google Scholar
- 17.Gupta A, Swaroop C, Agarwala S, Pandey RM, Bakhshi S (2009) Randomized controlled trial comparing oral amoxicillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin with intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin as outpatient therapy in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:635–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kern WV, Cometta A, De Bock R, Langenaeken J, Paesmans M, Gaya H (1999) Oral versus intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy for fever in patients with granulocytopenia who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. N Engl J Med 341:312–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Petrilli AS, Dantas LS, Campos MC, Tanaka C, Ginani VC, Seber A (2000) Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftriaxone administered in an outpatient setting for fever and neutropenia in low-risk pediatric oncology patients: randomized prospective trial. Med Pediatr Oncol 34:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Shrestha PN, Sah KP, Rana R (2009) Emperical oral antibiotic therapy for children with low risk febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. J Nepal Paediatr Soc 29(1):22–25Google Scholar
- 46.Vidal L, Paul M, Ben-Dor I, Pokroy E, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L (2004) Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003992Google Scholar