Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 2775–2783

Italian validation of the Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients

  • C. Brunelli
  • E. Bianchi
  • L. Murru
  • P. Monformoso
  • M. Bosisio
  • L. Gangeri
  • G. Miccinesi
  • M. Scrignaro
  • C. Ripamonti
  • C. Borreani
Original Article



The first instruments developed to evaluate specific logotherapeutic dimensions were the Purpose In Life (PIL) and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) tests, designed to reflect Frankl's concepts of, respectively, meaning in life attainment and will to meaning. This study aims to perform the Italian cultural adaptation and the psychometric validation of the PIL and SONG questionnaires.


We administered the PIL and SONG, culturally adapted into the Italian language, to 266 cancer patients. The psychometric validation appraised construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, known-group validity, and convergent validity of the two questionnaires with respect to one another.


The factorial analysis indicates that the original single-factor solution can be maintained for both instruments (proportion of variance explained by the first factor 77% and 71% for the PIL and SONG, respectively). The results show excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 for the PIL and 0.90 for the SONG) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 for the PIL and 0.81 for the SONG). As expected, males, believers, patients nearer to the diagnosis, and patients not undergoing psychological therapy have higher PIL and lower SONG scores, while expectations for age were not confirmed. The average level for the PIL was 107.3, while for the SONG, it was 66.1, and a negative correlation (−0.47) between PIL and SONG scores indicates good convergent validity of the two instruments.


Italian versions of the PIL and SONG are adequate and reliable self-report instruments for evaluating purpose in life and the motivation to find purpose for cancer patient populations.


Cancer Meaning in life Validation Logotherapy Psychological treatment 


  1. 1.
    Melton AMA, Schulenberg SE (2008) On the measurement of meaning: logotherapy's empirical contributions to humanistic psychology. Humanist Psychol 36:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breitbart W (2002) Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality- and meaning-centered group psychotherapy interventions in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 10:272–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Visser A, Garssen B, Vingerhoets A (2010) Spirituality and well-being in cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 19:565–572. doi:10.1002/pon.1626 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stefanek M, McDonald PG, Hess SA (2005) Religion, spirituality and cancer: current status and methodological challenges. Psycho-Oncology 14:450–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee V, Cohen SR, Edgar L et al (2004) Clarifying "meaning" in the context of cancer research: a systematic literature review. Palliat Support Care 2:291–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White CA (2004) Meaning and its measurement in psychosocial oncology. Psychooncology 13:468–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park CL (2010) Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull 136:257–301. doi:10.1037/a0018301 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (2002) Handbook of positive psychology. University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frankl VE (1959) The spiritual dimension in existential analysis and logotherapy. J Individ Psychol 15:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maslow AH, Maslow AH, Maslow AH (1968) Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yalom ID (1980) Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frankl VE (1959) Man's search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frankl V (2004) On the theory and therapy of mental disorders: an introduction to logotherapy and existential analysis (JM DuBois, Trans.). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.(Original work, 8th ed., published 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jim HS, Purnell JQ, Richardson SA et al (2006) Measuring meaning in life following cancer. Qual Life Res; 15: 1355-1371. Published on 20060713. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0028-6
  15. 15.
    Morgan J, Farsides T (2009) Measuring meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies 10:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reker GT, Peacock EJ (1981) The Life Attitude Profile (LAP): a multidimensional instrument for assessing attitudes toward life. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 13:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Battista J, Almond R. The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry 1973: 409-427.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schulenberg SE, Melton AMA (2010) A confirmatory factor-analytic evaluation of the Purpose in Life test: preliminary psychometric support for a replicable two-factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies : 1-17.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crumbaugh JC, Maholick LT (1964) An experimental study in existentialism: the psychometric approach to Frankl's concept of noogenic neurosis. J Clin Psychol 20:200–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crumbaugh JC (1977) The Seeking of Noetic Goals Test (SONG): a complementary scale to the Purpose in Life Test (PIL). J Clin Psychol 33:900–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zika S, Chamberlain K (1992) On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. Br J Psychol 83(Pt 1):133–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sink CA, van Keppel J, Purcell M (1998) Reliability estimates of the Purpose in Life and Seeking Noetic Goals tests with rural and metropolitan-area adolescents. Percept Mot Skills 86:362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reker GT, Fry PS (2003) Factor structure and invariance of personal meaning measures in cohorts of younger and older adults. Personal Individ Differ 35:977–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steger MF (2006) An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. J Pers Assess 86:263–272. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_03 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dyck MJ (1987) Assessing logotherapeutic constructs: conceptual and psychometric status of the Purpose in Life and Seeking of Noetic Goals Tests. Clin Psychol Rev 7:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schulenberg SE (2004) A psychometric investigation of logotherapy measures and the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). North American Journal of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reker GT, Cousins J (1979) Factor structure, construct validity and reliability of the Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) and Purpose in Life (PIL) tests. J Clin Psychol 35:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walters LH, Klein AE (1980) A cross-validated investigation of the Crumbaugh purpose-in-life test. Educ Psychol Meas 40:1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harlow LL, Newcomb MD, Bentler PM (1987) Purpose in Life Test assessment using latent variable methods. Br J Clin Psychol 26(Pt 3):235–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shek DT (1988) Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Purpose in Life Questionnaire. J Clin Psychol 44:384–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chamberlain K, Zika S (1988) Measuring meaning in life: an examination of three scales. Personal Individ Differ 9:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marsh A, Smith L, Piek J, Saunders B (2003) The purpose in life scale: psychometric properties for social drinkers and drinkers in alcohol treatment. Educ Psychol Meas 63:859Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Noguchi W, Morita S, Ohno T et al (2006) Spiritual needs in cancer patients and spiritual care based on logotherapy. Support Care Cancer ; 14: 65-70. Published on 20050426. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0827-2
  34. 34.
    Fegg MJ, Kramer M, L'hoste S, Borasio GD (2008) The Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE): validation of a new instrument for meaning-in-life research. J Pain Symptom Manage; 35: 356-364. Published on 20080128. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.007
  35. 35.
    Jonsen E, Fagerstrom L, Lundman B et al (2009) Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Purpose in Life scale. Scand J Caring Sci. Published on 20091103. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00682.x
  36. 36.
    Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Gibson C et al (2010) Meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology 19:21–28. doi:10.1002/pon.1556 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee V, Robin Cohen S, Edgar L et al (2006) Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med; 62: 3133-3145. Published on 20060118. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.041
  38. 38.
    Mazzotti E, Mazzuca F, Sebastiani C et al (2010) Predictors of existential and religious well-being among cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2010; 19: 1931-1907. Published on 20101125. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1033-4Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vespa A, Jacobsen PB, Spazzafumo L, Balducci L (2011) Evaluation of intrapsychic factors, coping styles, and spirituality of patients affected by tumors. Psycho-Oncology 20:5–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Crumbauch J, Maholick LT (1969) Manual of Instructions for the purpose in life test: Psychometric Affiliates Munster, IN.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Crumbaugh JC (1968) Cross-validation of purpose-in-life test based on Frankl's concepts. J Individ Psychol 24:74–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meier A, Edwards H (1974) Purpose-in-Life Test: age and sex differences. J Clin Psychol 30:384–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reker GT (1977) The Purpose-in-Life Test in an inmate population: an empirical investigation. J Clin Psychol 33:688–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reker GT (1992) Life Attitude Profile—Revised. Student Psychologists Press, Peterborough, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Taylor EJ (1993) Factors associated with meaning in life among people with recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 20:1399–1405, discussion 1406-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gerwood JB, LeBlanc M, Piazza N (1998) The purpose-in-life test and religious denomination: Protestant and Catholic scores in an elderly population. J Clin Psychol 54:49–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Brunelli
    • 1
  • E. Bianchi
    • 1
  • L. Murru
    • 1
  • P. Monformoso
    • 2
  • M. Bosisio
    • 1
  • L. Gangeri
    • 1
  • G. Miccinesi
    • 3
  • M. Scrignaro
    • 4
  • C. Ripamonti
    • 5
  • C. Borreani
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Psychology UnitIRCCS Foundation National Cancer InstituteMilanItaly
  2. 2.Italian Society of Logotherapy and Existential AnalysisNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology UnitInstitute for the Study and Prevention of Cancer (ISPO)FlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  5. 5.Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, IRCCS FoundationNational Cancer InstituteMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations