Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 2305–2313 | Cite as

Chore or priority? Barriers and facilitators affecting dilator use after pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer

  • Carissa Bonner
  • Kathryn Nattress
  • Caroline Anderson
  • Jonathan Carter
  • Chris Milross
  • Shannon Philp
  • Ilona JuraskovaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer often leads to damage of the vaginal mucosa, resulting in stenosis (obstruction by scar tissue). Stenosis has been associated with sexual dysfunction and can hinder medical examinations to detect recurrence. The use of vaginal dilators is frequently recommended to prevent or minimise stenosis, but women are reluctant to use these devices. The aim of this study was to explore the patient experience of dilator use and identify the barriers and facilitators affecting compliance with clinician recommendations.

Methods

Women were eligible for the study if they had undergone pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer up to 2 years ago and received a vaginal dilator as part of their post-treatment rehabilitation. Fifteen participants completed a semi-structured interview.

Results

Barriers to dilator use included: uncertainty about how/when to use dilators, viewing it as a negative experience, lack of time or forgetting and the need for discretion due to an association with sex aids. Facilitators included: concern about stenosis, belief that dilators work, reminders of stenosis, acceptance of dilator use as part of their normal routine or an extension of medical treatment and focusing on positive aspects. These factors were incorporated into a model of dilator use based on the Health Belief Model.

Conclusions

This is the first qualitative study to specifically investigate the patient experience of dilator use. The barriers and facilitators identified in this study and the proposed theory-based model provide new insights to inform future research and clinical management of dilator use.

Keywords

Gynaecological cancer Radiotherapy Stenosis Dilators 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Hartman P, Diddle AW (1972) Vaginal stenosis following irradiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cancer 30:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lancaster L (2004) Preventing vaginal stenosis after brachytherapy for gynaecological cancer: an overview of Australian practices. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8(1):30–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeffries SA, Robinson JW, Craighead PS, Keats MR (2006) An effective group psychoeducational intervention for improving compliance with vaginal dilation: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(2):404–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruner DW, Lanciano R, Keegan M, Corn B, Martin E, Hanks GE (1993) Vaginal stenosis and sexual function following intracavitary radiation for the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27(4):825–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Decruze SB, Guthrie D, Magnani R (1999) Prevention of vaginal stenosis in patients following vaginal brachytherapy. Clin Oncol 11:46–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flay LD, Matthews JH (1995) The effects of radiotherapy and surgery on the sexual function of women treated for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:399–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schover LR, Fife M, Gershenson DM (1989) Sexual dysfunction and treatment for early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 63(1):204–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denton AS, Maher EJ (2003) Interventions for the physical aspects of sexual dysfunction in women following pelvic radiotherapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miles T, Johnson N (2010) Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    White ID, Faithfull S (2006) Vaginal dilation associated with pelvic radiotherapy: a UK survey of current practice. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1140–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juraskova I, Butow P, Robertson R, Sharpe L, McLeod C, Hacker NF (2003) Post-treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight. Psycho-Oncol 12:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krumm S, Lamberti J (1993) Changes in sexual behaviour following radiation therapy for cervical cancer. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 14(1):51–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson JW, Faris PD, Scott CB (1999) Psychoeducational group increases vaginal dilation for younger women and reduces sexual fears for women of all ages with gynecological carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(3):497–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenstock I (1974) The Health Belief Model and preventive health behaviour. In: The Health Belief Model and personal health behaviour. M. Becker (ed). Thorofare: Charles B Slack. 27–59Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janz N, Becker M (1984) The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11:1–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carissa Bonner
    • 1
  • Kathryn Nattress
    • 2
  • Caroline Anderson
    • 1
  • Jonathan Carter
    • 2
  • Chris Milross
    • 2
  • Shannon Philp
    • 2
  • Ilona Juraskova
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED)The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Sydney Gynaecologic Oncology Group, Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney South West Area Health ServiceSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations