Using the Skindex-16 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess rash symptoms: results of a pooled-analysis (N0993)
- 420 Downloads
Historically, skin toxicity has been assessed in prospective clinical trials using the clinician-reported National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The patient-reported Skindex-16 measures symptoms and perceptions of toxicity. This study was designed to compare information provided by these two measures.
Data were compiled from three placebo-controlled North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies (N06C4, N03CB, N05C4) having rash prevention as the primary objective. All used the Skindex-16 and CTCAE at baseline, weekly during treatment and during a minimum 2-week follow-up period. Statistical procedures, including Pearson correlations, were utilized to determine relationships between adverse event (AE) grades and Skindex-16 scores.
Four hundred and twelve individual patients provided data (median age, 61; 134 male). Patients' Skindex-16 score results show a 0.9 overall mean (range 0–6 with 6 being worse symptoms), a 0.4 baseline mean (range, 0–4.3) and a 1.3 end-of-treatment mean (range, 0–5.9). Ninety-three, 142 and 177 patients experienced a grade 0, 1 and 2+ CTCAE skin toxicity, respectively. Baseline Skindex-16 scores had relatively low correlation with CTCAE grades. The correlation of rash grade with Skindex-16 scores ranged from r = 0.49 with the function subscale to r = 0.62 with the symptom subscale. The highest correlations of the maximum grade of any dermatological AE with the Skindex-16 were r = 0.48 for the total score and r = 0.55 for the symptom subscale.
The data reported support the decision to include both measures in a clinical trial to assess the patient experience, as each measure may specifically target varying symptoms and intensities.
KeywordsSkindex-16 CTCAE Dermatitis Patient-reported outcomes Cytotoxic treatment-induced dermatitis
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose for any of the authors.
- 2.Fu KK, Pajak TF, Trotti A et al (2000) A radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 48:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Herbst RS, Maddox A-M, Rothenberg ML et al (2002) Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well tolerated and has activity in non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumors: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 20:3815–3825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program NCI. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (CTCAE). http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Accessed 02 August 2010
- 14.Miller RC, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA, Griffin PC, Deming RL, Anders JC, Stoffel TJ, Haselow RE, Schaefer PL, Bearden JD, Atherton PJ, Loprinzi CL, Martenson JA (2011) Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase 3 double-blind, randomized trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N06C4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1460–1466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jatoi A, Rowland KM, Sloan JA, Gross HM, Fishkin PA, Kahanic SP, Novotny PJ, Schaefer PL, Johnson DB, Tschetter LK, Loprinzi CL (2008) Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin rashes: results of a placebo-controlled trial from the NCCTG (N03CB). Cancer 113:847–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Neben-Wittich MA, Atherton PJ, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA, Griffin PC, Deming RL, Anders JC, Loprinzi CL, Burger KN, Martenson JA, Miller RC (2011) Comparison of provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures of acute skin toxicity during a phase III trial of mometasone cream versus placebo during breast radiotherapy: the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:397–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). http://outcomes.cancer.gov/tools/pro-ctcae_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2010