Inequalities in access to cancer treatment: an analysis of cross-regional patient mobility in Greece
- 192 Downloads
The quest of specialized oncology services represents an inelastic need for cancer patients that often leads to traveling in order to receive adequate care. The present survey assesses patient geographic mobility to access services for the prevention and treatment of neoplasmatic diseases in Greece, a country where the National Health System is characterized by severe misdistribution of oncology-specific resources.
Based on data from the National Statistical Service for 1999–2005 (last available), we estimated geographic mobility as the difference between oncology patients residing in a specific region and those receiving care in National Health System (NHS) facilities located in the region, for the ten administrative districts of Greece. Especially for Attica, we performed a sub-analysis according to cancer diagnosis.
The most significant mobility is towards Attica, where patients receiving care within the region outnumber the patients actually residing by 48.9% annually, on average. Positive flows are also observed towards Macedonia (8.4%) and Epirus (7.8%). Negative flows are recorded in all remaining regions, the highest noticed in Sterea (−76.2%), Ionian Islands (−63.3%), Aegean Islands (−45.2%), and Thessaly (−37.3%). The largest flow towards Attica is for cases of malignant neoplasms of the skin, uterus, male genital organs, and for Hodgkin’s lymphomas.
Misallocation of oncology-specific resources creates “two-tier” cancer patients based on ability to pay for traveling/accommodation. The severity and the consequences of the disease necessitate a bold approach to resource allocation and the establishment of integrated patient support networks that ensure all cancer patients are offered equal opportunities to effective treatment.
KeywordsCancer Access Equity Geographic mobility Resource allocation
The present study was financially supported by Roche (Hellas) S.A.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
We also declare that we have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data, if requested.
- 1.World Health Organization (2001) The World Health Report 2001. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ries LAG, Cl K, Hankey BF et al (1999) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1996. National Cancer Institute, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- 3.World Health Organization (2004): Global Burden of Disease Estimates. Death and DALY estimates for 2002 by WHO member state. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_2000_2002/en/index.html. Accessed on: 26 Feb 2010
- 12.Chiu LF (2003). Inequalities of access to cancer screening: a literature review. Cancer Screening Series No. 1, December. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
- 13.Souliotis K, Athanasakis K, Golna C, Papadopoulou C, Kyriopoulos J (2009) Availability and spatial contribution of oncology specific resources in Greece. Doc Greek Med 26:808–817Google Scholar
- 14.Souliotis K (2007) Economic inequalities and health policy. Papazisis Publishers, AthensGoogle Scholar
- 18.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)—Working Party on Social Policy, Human Resources for Health Care Systems (2002) Geographical imbalances of HRHC: size, determinants and policy responses. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 20.Souliotis K (2001) Approach of the social and regional inequalities in health in Greece. Topos 17:49–74Google Scholar
- 27.Rosato R, Sacerdote C, Pagano E, Di Cuonzo D, Baldi I, Bordon R, Ponti A, Bertetto O, Segnan N, Merletti F, Vineis P, Ciccone G (2009) Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population-based study in Northern Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:349–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Dejardin O, Remontet L, Bouvier AM, Danzon A, Trétarre B, Delafosse P, Molinié F, Maarouf N, Velten M, Sauleau EA, Bourdon-Raverdy N, Grosclaude P, Boutreux S, De Pouvourville G, Launoy G (2006) Socioeconomic and geographic determinants of survival of patients with digestive cancer in France. Br J Cancer 95:944–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar