Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 49–55 | Cite as

How is cancer recently portrayed in Canadian newspapers compared to 20 years ago?

  • Melissa Henry
  • Brendan Trickey
  • Lina Nuoxin Huang
  • S. Robin Cohen
Original Article

Abstract

This study investigated cancer portrayals in newspapers now and 20 years ago. Six major daily newspapers from regions across Canada were studied. All articles from a 3-month period in 2008 (n = 576) and 1988 or 1989 (n = 412) focusing on cancer were analyzed. Cancer is a more prevalent topic and is depicted in a more positive light in newspapers now when compared to 20 years ago. In 2008, the most common cancer-related themes were cancer research (27%), risk factors (26%), treatment (24%), education/prevention (20%), and fundraising events (19%). Compared to 1988/1989, in 2008, there was a significant decrease in articles covering the end of life and surgery, while there was a significant increase in articles portraying the senior population, male issues, individual stories depicting people suffering from cancer, the health care system, fundraising events, and ethics and law. The percentage of articles on psychosocial aspects of the cancer experience remained the same in 1988/1989 compared with 2008, with 16% of articles covering psychological aspects (vs. 17% in 2008), 5.6% social aspects (vs. 3.9% in 2008), and 0.2% spiritual aspects (vs. 0.5% in 2008). In 2008, few cancer articles spoke in-depth about palliative care (2.8%), issues concerning death and dying (5%), or bereavement (1%). Cancer newspaper reporting mostly focuses on the physical aspects of cancer rather than presenting a more holistic approach including psychosocial issues. Implications of the shifts in tone and content of newspaper reporting are discussed. We highlight the importance of promoting coverage of distress as the sixth vital sign in newspaper press so as to inform readers about the experience of cancer and the existence of psychosocial services designed to optimize quality of life.

Keywords

Newspaper Media Cancer Representation Content Psychosocial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Melissa Henry was a Research Fellow of the Canadian Cancer Society and has been financially supported through the CIHR/Strategic Training Program in Palliative Care Research. Brendan Trickey was financially supported through McGill University’s Faculty of Medicine Summer 2008 Research Bursary Program, with a bursary from the Mach Gaensslen Foundation. This study and Lina Nuoxin Huang were supported by Canadian Cancer Society grant #012201.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Canadian Cancer Society (2009) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2009. Toronto, Canada. ISSN 0835-2976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adelman RC, Verbrugge LM (2000) Death makes news: the social impact of disease on newspaper coverage. J Health Soc Behav 41(3):347–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke JN, Everest MM (2006) Cancer in the mass print media: fear, uncertainty and the medical model. Soc Sci Med 62(10):2591–2600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stryker JE, Moriarty CM, Jensen JD (2008) Effects of newspaper coverage on public knowledge about modifiable cancer risks. Health Commun 23(4):380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tian Y, Robinson JD (2008) Media use and health information seeking: an empirical test of complementarity theory. Health Commun 23(2):184–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niederdeppe J, Frosch DL, Hornik RC (2008) Cancer news coverage and information seeking. Health Commun 13(2):181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mullins R, Wakefield M, Broun K (2008) Encouraging the right women to attend for cervical cancer screening: results from a targeted television campaign in Victoria, Australia. Health Educ Res 23(3):477–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ooi ES, Chapman S (2003) An analysis of newspaper reports of cancer breakthroughs: hope or hype? Med J Aust 179(11–12):639–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brody JE (1999) Communicating cancer risk in print journalism. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:170–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halpin M, Phillips M, Oliffe JL (2009) Prostate cancer stories in the Canadian print media: representations of illness, disease and masculinities. Sociol Health Illn 31(2):155–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donelle L, Hoffman-Goetz L, Clarke JN (2004) Portrayal of genetic risk for breast cancer in ethnic and non-ethnic newspapers. Women Health 40(4):93–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdelmutti N, Hoffman-Goetz L (2009) Risk messages about HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine Gardasil: a content analysis of Canadian and U.S. national newspaper articles. Women Health 49(5):422–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bertrand JT, O’Reilly K, Denison J, Anhang R, Sweat M (2006) Systematic review of the effectiveness of mass communication programs to change HIV/AIDS-related behaviors in developing countries. Health Educ Res 21(4):567–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Finlay SJ, Faulkner G (2005) Physical activity promotion through the mass media: inception, production, transmission and consumption. Prev Med 40(2):121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maibach E (2007) The influence of the media environment on physical activity: looking for the big picture. Am J Health Promot 21(4, Suppl):353–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wray RJ (2006) Public health communication theory and strategies for interpersonal violence prevention. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma 13(3–4):41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leenaars AA (2005) Effective public health strategies in suicide prevention are possible: a selective review of recent studies. Clin Neuropsychiatry J Treat Eval 2(1):21–31Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Kaiser Family Foundation and The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism (2009) Health news coverage in the U.S. media (January–June 2009). http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7950.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2010.
  19. 19.
    Schraub S (1988) Alternative treatments of cancer in the press. Psychol Med 20(9):1298–1299Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Statistics Canada (2010) Table 051-0001—Estimates of population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (persons unless otherwise noted), CANSIM (database). http://cansim2.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-win/cnsmcgi.exe?Lang=E&CNSM-Fi=CII/CII_1-eng.htm. Accessed 17 Oct 2010
  22. 22.
    Westin E (2002) Best practices for television journalists (a handbook for reporters, producers, videographers, news directors and other broadcast professionals on how to be fair to the public), 2002. http://www.freedomforum.org/publications/BestPractices/BestPractices.Westin.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2010
  23. 23.
    Grabe ME, Kamhawi R (2006) Hard wired for negative news? Gender differences in processing broadcast news. Commun Res 33(5):346–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kromm EE, Smith KC, Singer RF (2007) Survivors on cancer: the portrayal of cancer in print news. J Cancer Surviv 1(4):298–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Henry
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brendan Trickey
    • 3
  • Lina Nuoxin Huang
    • 3
  • S. Robin Cohen
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of OncologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Segal Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Lady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations