Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 1921–1929

Problems in transition and quality of care: perspectives of breast cancer survivors

  • Aimee Kendall Roundtree
  • Sharon H. Giordano
  • Andrea Price
  • Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
Original Article



We conducted a qualitative study to explore breast cancer survivors’ perceptions and attitudes about their current healthcare utilization, screening, and information needs.


We completed eight focus groups of breast cancer survivors. We included women, adult survivors, with an initial diagnosis of breast cancer in the year 2000, treated, and without a recurrence as per medical record. To analyze transcripts, we used grounded theory methods, wherein unexpected themes and direct answers emerged from consensus between co-coders.


Focus groups included 33 participants, the majority of whom were white (84.8%), college-educated (66.7%), and covered by private medical insurance (75.7%) or Medicare (27.3%). Participants’ perceptions and attitudes about care were framed in terms of personal experiences (including facing barriers to screening, feeling in limbo in the healthcare system, having problems with communication with and between physicians, confusion about symptoms, and using self-prescribe remedies), personal attitudes (including strong opinions about what survivorship means, concerns about recurrence, and changes in self-perception and agency), and social influences (including modeling others’ behaviors, changes in social life, and listening to family).


Survivorship attitudes, recurrence fears, memories, and self-perceptions were influential personal factors in addition to self-efficacy. Solutions such as providing a cancer treatment summary might resolve many of the problems by consolidating and making readily available the numerous medical history and recommendations that survivors accrue over time, switching from provider to provider. Clinicians must also implement communication changes in their interactions with patients to enhance positive attitudes and behaviors, and leverage social influences.


Qualitative Breast cancer survivors Healthcare transition 


  1. 1.
    Mullan F (1985) Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med 313:270–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan NF, Ward A, Watson E, Austoker J, Rose PW (2008) Long-term survivors of adult cancers and uptake of primary health services: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 44:195–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sheppard C (2007) Breast cancer follow-up: literature review and discussion. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11:340–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC (2003) Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 21:1447–1451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabin C, Pinto B (2006) Cancer-related beliefs and health behavior change among breast cancer survivors and their first-degree relatives. Psychooncology 15:701–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bettencourt BA, Molix L, Talley AE, Westgate S (2007) Satisfaction with health care, psychological adjustment, and community esteem among breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 25:59–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaiser K (2008) The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 67:79–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yeom HE, Heidrich SM (2009) Effect of perceived barriers to symptom management on quality of life in older breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs 32:309–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helgeson VS, Snyder P, Seltman H (2004) Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health Psychol 23:3–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lebel S, Rosberger Z, Edgar L, Devins GM (2008) Predicting stress-related problems in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosom Res 65:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krueger R (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan D (1993) Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss AC, Corbin J (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strauss AC, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31:143–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benight CC, Bandura A (2004) Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 42:1129–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bussey K, Bandura A (1999) Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychol Rev 106:676–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M (2007) Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 85:93–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson MO, Neilands TB, Dilworth SE, Morin SF, Remien RH, Chesney MA (2007) The role of self-efficacy in HIV treatment adherence: validation of the HIV treatment adherence self-efficacy scale (HIV-ASES). J Behav Med 30:359–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wasson JH, Johnson DJ, Mackenzie T (2008) The impact of primary care patients’ pain and emotional problems on their confidence with self-management. J Ambulatory Care Manage 31:120–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fu MR (2005) Breast cancer survivors’ intentions of managing lymphedema. Cancer Nurs 28: 446–457; quiz 458–449Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gray RE, Fitch M, Greenberg M, Hampson A, Doherty M, Labrecque M (1998) The information needs of well, longer-term survivors of breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 33:245–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertero C, Chamberlain Wilmoth M (2007) Breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment affecting the self: a meta-synthesis. Cancer Nurs 30:194–202; quiz 203–194Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elphee EE (2008) Understanding the concept of uncertainty in patients with indolent lymphoma. Oncol Nurs Forum 35:449–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mao JJ, Bowman MA, Stricker CT, DeMichele A, Jacobs L, Chan D, Armstrong K (2009) Delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: the perspective of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 27:933–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bussing A, Fischer J (2009) Interpretation of illness in cancer survivors is associated with health-related variables and adaptive coping styles. BMC Womens Health 9:2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clayton MF, Mishel MH, Belyea M (2006) Testing a model of symptoms, communication, uncertainty, and well-being, in older breast cancer survivors. Res Nurs Health 29:18–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ganz PA, Hahn EE (2008) Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:759–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cappiello M, Cunningham RS, Knobf MT, Erdos D (2007) Breast cancer survivors: information and support after treatment. Clin Nurs Res 16:278–293; discussion 294–301Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Partridge AH, Winer EP, Burstein HJ (2003) Follow-up care of breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol 30:817–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aimee Kendall Roundtree
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sharon H. Giordano
    • 1
  • Andrea Price
    • 3
  • Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of Houston-DowntownHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Youth and Family ServicesMontgomery County Youth ServicesConroeUSA

Personalised recommendations