A qualitative assessment of upper quarter dysfunction reported by physical therapists treated for breast cancer or treating breast cancer sequelae
- 342 Downloads
As survival rates for breast cancer improve, long-term effects of treatment are receiving increasing attention, including upper quarter impairments and functional limitations. The purpose of this study was to assess, through qualitative means, the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment on upper quarter function as reported by those with expertise in upper quarter dysfunction. Participants were physical therapists who were either breast cancer survivors (“survivors”) or those who specialized in treatment of individuals post-breast cancer (“treaters”).
Subjects and methods
Three focus groups (two groups of survivors [n = 16] and one group of treaters [n = 10]) were convened to discuss their experiences with upper quarter dysfunction post-breast cancer. Qualitative research methods were used to collect and analyze the data, to extract themes, and to assure reliability and validity of the original and extracted data.
Two themes emerged from the data and are supported by participant quotes. The first theme described the presence of upper quarter dysfunction that impacted body structure and function and resulted in activity/participation limitations. The second theme described the contextual factors that impacted the reported dysfunction, including access to comprehensive care, inadequate attention by health care providers, and a resulting need for self-advocacy.
The study supports the problem of late effects from breast cancer treatment on upper quarter function and points out the need for better education for health care providers, increased long-term surveillance of survivors, and a more proactive model of health care delivery for this population.
KeywordsBreast neoplasm Shoulder dysfunction Qualitative research Physical therapy
The authors wish to recognize the Oncology Section and the Section on Research of the American Physical Therapy Association, as well as the facilitators and participants, for their support of this project.
Conflict of interest
This research was not sponsored by any organization, and none of the authors has a financial relationship with any organizations for which this research would present a conflict of interest. The data were in the hands of the authors at all times and are available to the journal upon request.
- 11.Satariano WA, Ragland DR (1996) Upper-body strength and breast cancer: a comparison of the effects of age and disease. J Gerontol 51(5):M215–M219Google Scholar
- 18.Kuehn T, Klauss W, Darsow M, Regele S, Flock F, Maiterth C, Dahlbender R, Wendt I, Kreienberg R (2000) Long-term morbidity following axillary dissection in breast cancer patients—clinical assessment, significance for life quality and the impact of demographic, oncologic and therapeutic factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 64(3):275–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publ, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 28.Rietman JS, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Baas P, De Vries J, Dolsma WV, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH, Hoekstra HJ (2004) Treatment-related upper limb morbidity 1 year after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection for stage I or II breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 11(11):1018–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.van Gestel YR, Voogd AC, Vingerhoets AJ, Mols F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Driel OJ, van Berlo CL, van de Poll-Franse LV (2007) A comparison of quality of life, disease impact and risk perception in women with invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer 43(3):549–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar