Parental experience at the end-of-life in children with cancer: ‘preservation’ and ‘letting go’ in relation to loss
- 1k Downloads
For children with incurable cancer death usually is anticipated and preceded by a phase of palliative care. Despite recognition that parents have difficulty adapting to a palliative perspective there is little insight into this process. This study explored, from a parental perspective, the process parents go through when cure is no longer a possibility.
Participants and methods
A multicenter study using qualitative research was undertaken during the EoL phase. One-time and repeated open interviews were conducted with 44 parents of 23 children with incurable cancer.
Feelings of loss play a prominent role during the EoL phase. Dealing with loss is a process of stepwise relinquishing that becomes manifest in an internal struggle between preservation and letting go. Preservation means that parents try to maintain the child’s status quo. Letting go means parents give up their resistance to loss in service of their child’s well-being. Although the relative measure of each changes over time, parents have great difficulty making the transition because it implies a change in source of control. A timely completion of this transition positively influences the child’s well-being as well as the evaluation of enacted parenthood.
For parents the essence of the palliative process is not to accept death but to deal with the loss of their child. Although the need to avoid loss and gain control by means of preservation is fully understandable, the study indicated that parents who made the transition to letting go had an increased receptiveness of their child’s real situation and needs.
KeywordsDecision-making Neoplasm Palliative care Parenting Quality of life End-of-life care
Funding for this study was supported by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society.
Rotterdam, Erasmus MC
Rob Pieters/Auke Beishuizen
Inekee van der Vaart/Clementine Dekker/Maria de Jong
Nijmegen, Radboud MC
- 1.Bearison DJ (2006) When treatment fails. How medicine cares for dying children. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Creswell JW (2003) Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 11.Holloway I, Wheeler S (2002) Qualitative research in nursing. Blackwell Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kars MC, Grypdonck MHF, Duijnstee MSH (2003) Being there: the way parents experience and cope with the care for their child with leukaemia. Academia, Gent (Dutch Publication)Google Scholar
- 22.Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Inter J Qualitative Methods. Available at: http://www.ualberta.ca/∼ijqm. Accessed 29 June 2006
- 23.Nolen-Hoeksema S, Larson J (1999) Coping with loss. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 26.NVivo [computer program] (2006) Version 7. QSR International, Doncaster VictoriaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rousseau P (1995) Hospice and palliative care. Dis Mon 41:774–842Google Scholar
- 32.Stiller CA, Draper GJ (2005) The epidemiology of cancer in children. In: Voute PA, Barret A, Stevens MCG, Caron HN (eds) Cancer in children. Clinical management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–16Google Scholar
- 33.Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 37.WHO (1998) Definition of palliative care. Available at http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/WHO. Accessed 2 Feb 2009