Pharmaceutical interventions facilitate premedication and prevent opioid-induced constipation and emesis in cancer patients
- 564 Downloads
Opioid analgesics possess a number of side effects, among which constipation and nausea/vomiting occur most frequently. Although pretreatment with laxatives and antiemetics for the prophylaxis of opioid-induced constipation and nausea/vomiting, respectively, is recommended, such side effects are still a matter of concern in clinical setting.
We first surveyed the prevalence of premedication in 83 cancer patients who took opioid analgesics and the incidence of such side effects. Subsequently, intervention was carried out to promote premedication, and the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated in 107 patients.
Prophylactic treatment with laxatives and antiemetics were conducted in 57% and 52%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed laxatives and antiemetics were magnesium oxide in combination with pantethine, a mild stimulant laxative, and prochlorperazine, respectively. The lack of premedication increased the risk of constipation (odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence intervals, 1.93–14.31; p = 0.001) and vomiting (4.67, 1.04–21.04; p = 0.045). Intervention such as provision of drug information to physicians, verification of prescription orders, and instructions to patients increased the rates of prophylactic medications to 93% (p < 0.001) for laxatives and 81% (p < 0.001) for antiemetics. The incidence of side effects was lowered from 36% to 9% (p < 0.001) for constipation, from 28% to 17% for nausea (p = 0.077), and from 16% to 4% for vomiting (p = 0.0085).
Intervention to promote prophylactic medication was highly effective in reducing the risk of opioid-induced constipation and nausea/vomiting.
KeywordsOpioid analgesic Constipation Nausea/vomiting Prophylaxis Laxatives Antiemetics
- 3.Svendsen KB, Andersen S, Arnason S, Arnér S, Breivik H, Heiskanen T, Kalso E, Kongsgaard UE, Sjogren P, Strang P, Bach FW, Jensen TS (2005) Breakthrough pain in malignant and non-malignant diseases: a review of prevalence, characteristics and mechanisms. Eur J Pain 9:195–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, Davis C, Fallon M, McQuay H, Mercadante S, Pasternak G, Ventafridda V, Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care Network (2001) Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: An evidence-based report. J Clin Oncol 19:2542–2554PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Shahbazian A, Heinemann A, Schmidhammer H, Beubler E, Holzer-Petsche U, Holzer P (2002) Involvement of mu- and kappa-, but not delta-, opioid receptors in the peristaltic motor depression caused by endogenous and exogenous opioids in the guinea-pig intestine. Br J Pharmacol 135:741–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, McCarberg B, Todd KH, Paice JA, Lipman AG, Bookbinder M, Sanders SH, Turk DC, Carr DB (2005) American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med 165:1574–1580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology v.1. (2009) Adult cancer pain. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/pain.pdf