Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 1271–1277 | Cite as

Attitudes toward end-of-life situations other than euthanasia and assisted suicide among Portuguese oncologists

Original Article



The aim of this study was to determine the attitude of Portuguese oncologists toward end-of-life situations other than euthanasia and assisted suicide.


This study used a survey of 450 Portuguese oncologists by postal means and personal contact.

Main results

The response rate was 33% (143). Only 7.7% doctors would give lethal doses of drugs to someone with an incurable, advanced, and progressive disease that is unable to make decisions, at the request of a family member or other close person. However, 30 doctors (21.3%) would prefer, in the event they were in such a situation, that the drugs be given them at their request. None of the 12.4% who have received such requests admitted to committing any of those acts. Almost 70% of the doctors would withdraw life support measures at the patient's request if the same had an incurable, advanced, and progressive disease, and a further 14% would do it in certain circumstances, but only 41% would withdraw measures such as nutrition and hydration. Fewer doctors would withdraw such measures including nutrition and hydration at a family member's request or on their own initiative. Religion has a major influence on the doctors' opinion. Most doctors (96.5%) agreed with the administration of drugs for symptom control even foreseeing that they could shorten life.


Most Portuguese oncologists respect patients' autonomy, favoring the withdrawal of life support treatment at the patients' request when appropriate and much less do so on the request of others or by their own initiative. They appropriately do not confuse those practices with symptom relief even when hastened death can be envisaged.


End-of-life decisions Life-terminating acts without explicit request of patient Treatment withdrawal Symptom control 


  1. 1.
    Kuhse H, Singer P, Baume P, Clark M, Rickard M (1997) End-of-life decisions in Australian medical practice. Med J Aust 166:191–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pijnenborg L, van der Maas PJ, van Delden JJ, Looman CWN (1993) Life-terminating acts without explicit request of patients. Lancet 341:1196–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilsen J, Norup M, Delians L et al (2006) Drugs to alleviate symptoms with life shortening as a possible side effect: end-of-life care in six European countries. J Pain Symptom Manage 31:111–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, Nilstun T, Norup M, Paci E, van der Wal G, van der Maas PJ, on behalf of the EURELD consortium (2003) End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 362:345–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buiting HM, van Delden JM, Rietjens AC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Bielsen J, Fischer S, Löfmark R, Miccinesi G, Norup M, van der Heide A, on behalf of the EURELD-Consortium (2007) J Pain Symptom Manage 34:305313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonçalves F (2009) Attitudes toward assisted death amongst Portuguese oncologists. Support Care Cancer (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bittel N, Neuenschwander H, Stiefel F (2002) “Euthanasia”: a survey by the Swiss Association for Palliative Care. Support Care Cancer 10:265–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doukas DJ, Waterhouse D, Gorenflo DW, Seid J (1995) Attitudes and behaviours on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists. J Clin Oncol 13:1055–1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meier DE, Emmons CA, Wallenstein S, Quill T, Morrison RS, Cassel CK (1998) A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. N Engl J Med 338:1193–1201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Englert Y (2004) Belgium—evolution of the debate. Em: Euthanasia. Volume II. National and European perspectives. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, pp 13–24Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee MA, Nelson HD, Tilden VP, Ganzini L, Schmidt TA, Tolle SW (1996) Legalizing assisted suicide—views of physicians in Oregon. N Engl J Med 334:310–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen JS, Fihn SD, Boyko EJ, Jonsen AR, Wood RW (1994) Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington state. N Engl J Med 331:89–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howard OM, Fairclough DL, Daniels R, Emanuel EJ (1997) Physician desire for euthanasia and assisted suicide: would physicians practice what they preach? J Clin Oncol 15:428–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wenger NS, Carmel S (2004) Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviours. Mt Sinai J Med 71:335–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Back AL, Wallace JI, Starks HE, Pearlman RA (1996) Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington state: patient requests and physician responses. JAMA 275:919–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganzini L, Nelson HD, Schmidt TA, Kreamer DF, Delorit MA, Lee MA (2000) Physicians' experience with the Oregon death with dignity act. N Engl J Med 324(20):557–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324:1183–1185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    INFARMED. Informação científica sobre medicamentos: relatório [Scientific information on drugs: report]. Available at Accessed April 2007
  19. 19.
    Asch DA, Jedrziewski K, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Português de OncologiaUCP-RPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations