Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 359–366

Attitudes toward assisted death amongst Portuguese oncologists

Original Article

Abstract

Background

The attitudes and practise of doctors concerning euthanasia and assisted suicide have been the subject of studies performed in many countries. However, these issues have not been studied properly in Portugal.

Materials and method

This study is a survey of 450 Portuguese oncologists by postal means and personal contact.

Results

The response rate was 33% (143). Only 13% would practise euthanasia with the present law in force forbidding such practise, and 24% would do so if it were legalised; 39% favoured its legalisation and 36% would like to have the option of euthanasia if they had a terminal disease. About assisted suicide, 15% would do it with the current law in force forbidding such action and 25% would do so if it were made legal; 32% favoured its legalisation and 24% would like to have that option if they had a terminal disease. There was one case of euthanasia and no cases of assisted suicide. The most important factor related with the acceptance of euthanasia and assisted suicide was religion, with non-practising Catholics accepting such practises more often than practising Catholics. The Portuguese oncologists have a very positive view on the potential role of palliative care in preventing many requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Conclusion

Portuguese oncologists are mainly against the practise of euthanasia and assisted suicide and the number of requests is also relatively low; consequently, the number of episodes of assisted death is also apparently very low.

Keywords

Assisted death Euthanasia Assisted suicide End-of-life decisions Palliative care 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee MA, Nelson HD, Tilden VP, Ganzini L, Schmidt TA, Tolle SW (1996) Legalizing assisted suicide—views of physicians in Oregon. N Engl J Med 334:310–315. doi:10.1056/NEJM199602013340507 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Back AL, Wallace JI, Starks HE, Pearlman RA (1996) Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington state: patient requests and physician responses. JAMA 275:919–925. doi:10.1001/jama.275.12.919 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emanuel EJ, Fairclough D, Clarridge BC et al (2000) Attitudes and practices of U.S. oncologists regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Ann Intern Med 133:527–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Maas PJ, Van Delden JJM, Pijnenborg L, Looman CWN (1991) Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet 338:669–674. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91) 91241-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuhse H, Singer P, Baume P, Clark M, Rickard M (1997) End-of-life decisions in Australian medical practice. MJA 166:191–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deliens L, Mortier F, Bilsen J, Cosyns M, Stichele RV, Vanoverloop J, Ingels K (2000) End-of-life decisions in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: a nationwide survey. Lancet 356:1806–1811. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00) 03233-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchell K, Owens G (2003) National survey of medical decisions at end of life made by New Zealand general practitioners. BMJ 327:202–203. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7408.202 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comby MC, Filbert M (2005) The demand for euthanasia in palliative care units: a prospective study in seven units of the “Rhône-Alpes” region. Palliat Med 19:587–593. doi:10.1191/0269216305pm1081oa CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Førde R, Aasland OG, Falkum E (1997) The ethics of euthanasia—attitudes and practice among Norwegian physicians. Soc Sci Med 45:887–892. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96) 00430-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, Nilstun T, Norup M, Paci E, van der Wal G, van der Maas PJ (2003) End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 362:345–350. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03) 14019-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seale C (2006) National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners. Palliat Med 20:3–10. doi:10.1191/0269216306pm1094oa CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bittel N, Neuenschwander H, Stiefel F (2002) "Euthanasia": a survey by the Swiss Association for Palliative Care. Support Care Cancer 10:265–271. doi:10.1007/s00520-001-0325-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doukas DJ, Waterhouse D, Gorenflo DW, Seid J (1995) Attitudes and behaviours on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists. J Clin Oncol 13:1055–1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meier DE, Emmons CA, Wallenstein S, Quill T, Morrison RS, Cassel CK (1998) A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. N Engl J Med 338:1193–1201. doi:10.1056/NEJM199804233381706 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masterstvedt LJ, Kaasa S (2002) Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Scandinavia—with a conceptual suggestion regarding international research in relation to the phenomena. Palliat Med 16:17–32. doi:10.1191/0269216302pm470oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gielen J, van der Branden S, Broeckaert B (2008) Attitudes of European physicians toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a review of the recent literature. J Palliat Care 24:173–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I et al (1996) Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. N Engl J Med 335:1699–1705. doi:10.1056/NEJM199611283352227 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Howard OM, Fairclough DL, Daniels R, Emanuel EJ (1997) Physician desire for euthanasia and assisted suicide: would physicians practise what they preach? J Clin Oncol 15:428–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller-Busch HC, Oduncu FS, Woskanjan S, Klaschik E (2004) Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation—a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine. Med Health Care Philos 7:333–339. doi:10.1007/s11019-004-9349-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miccinesi G, Fisher S, Paci E et al (2005) Physicians’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions. A comparison between seven countries. Soc Sci Med 60:1961–1974. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryynänen O-P, Myllykangas M, Viren M, Heino H (2002) Attitudes towards euthanasia among physicians, nurses and the general public in Finland. Public Health 116:322–331. doi:10.1016/S0033-3506(02) 00556-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen JS, Fihn SD, Boyko EJ, Jonsen AR, Wood RW (1994) Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington state. N Engl J Med 331:89–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pasterfield D, Wilkinson C, Finlay IG, Neal RD, Hulbert NJG (2006) P’s views on changing the law on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, and willingness to prescribe or inject lethal drugs: a survey from Wales. Br J Gen Pract 56:450–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    INFARMED Informação científica sobre medicamentos: relatório. [Scientific information on medicaments: report] http://www.infarmed.pt/portal/page/portal/INFARMED/MONITORIZACAO_DO_MERCADO/OBSERVATORIO/INTRODUCAO_DE_FICHEIROS/ICM_rel_preliminar.pdf (accessed in April 2007).
  25. 25.
    Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324:1183–1185. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asch DA, Jedrziewski K, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(97) 00126-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Português de OncologiaUCP-RPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations