Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress
- 248 Downloads
Goals of work
Screening oncology patients for clinically significant emotional distress is a recommended standard of care in psycho-oncology. However, principles regarding the interpretation of screening and diagnostic tests developed in other areas of medicine have not been widely applied in psycho-oncology. This paper explores the application of the concepts of likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities to the interpretation of psychological screening instruments and demonstrates the development of an algorithm for screening for emotional distress and common psychopathology.
Materials and methods
Three hundred forty oncology/haematology outpatients at the Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia completed the Distress Thermometer (DT), the PSYCH-6 subscale of the Somatic and Psychological Health Report and the Kessler-10 scale. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (cutoff 15+) was used as the gold standard.
Likelihood ratios showed that a score over threshold on the DT was 2.77 times more likely in patients who were cases on the HADS. These patients had a 53% post-test probability of being cases on the HADS compared with the pretest probability of 29%. Adding either the PSYCH-6 (3+) or the Kessler-10 (22+) to the DT (4+) significantly increased this post-test probability to 94% and 92%, respectively. The significance of these improvements was confirmed by logistic regression analysis.
This study demonstrated the application of probability statistics to develop an algorithm for screening for distress in oncology patients. In our sample, a two-stage screening algorithm improved appreciably on the performance of the DT alone to identify distressed patients. Sequential administration of a very brief instrument followed by selective use of a longer inventory may save time and increase acceptability.
KeywordsCancer Oncology Screening Emotional distress Depression Anxiety
The authors wish to thank Mr. Stuart Allen for devising the computerised versions of the questionnaires and data support, Dr. Heidi Reichler for extracting clinical information, Ms. Cynthia Millar for assistance with the statistical analysis, staff and volunteers in the outpatients' department for their support of the project and the research assistants Ms. Danielle Anthony, Ms. Neta Moses and Mr. Jason O'Connor.
- 1.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2004) Distress management guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Jenkintown, PAGoogle Scholar
- 3.Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Holland JC (2000) An algorithm for rapid assessment and referral of distressed patients. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000 Educational Book. Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting May 19–23, 2000. New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gil F, Grassi L, Travado L, Tomamichel M, Gonzalez JR, Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study Group (2005) Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 13:600–606. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0780-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Attia J (2003) Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests. Aust Prescr 26:111–113Google Scholar
- 13.Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Barratt A, Walter S, Cook D, McAlister F, Attia J (2002) Measures of association. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) Users' guide to the medical literature: evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association Press, Chicago, pp 351–368Google Scholar
- 14.Panzer RJ, Black ER, Griner PF (1999) Interpretation of diagnostic tests and strategies for their use in quantitative decision making. In: Black ER, Bordley DR, Tape TG, Panzer RJ (eds) Diagnostic strategies for common medical problems. American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, pp 31–36Google Scholar
- 28.Australian Bureau of Statistics Information paper (2003) Use of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in ABS Health Surveys. Cat No 4817.0.55.001 Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth PublishingGoogle Scholar
- 29.Suchman AL, Dolan JG (1999) Odds and likelihood ratios. In: Black ER, Bordley DR, Tape TG, Panzer RJ (eds) Diagnostic strategies for common medical problems. American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, pp 31–36Google Scholar
- 30.Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) (2002) Users' guide to the medical literature: evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 31.Clover K, Rogers K, Carter C, Adams C (2008) QUICA-TOUCH: the first 12 months of screening for distress, pain and psychopathology. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 4(Suppl 2):A60Google Scholar