Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 627–644 | Cite as

Clinician-patient communication: a systematic review

  • Gary Rodin
  • Jean A. Mackay
  • Camilla Zimmermann
  • Carole Mayer
  • Doris Howell
  • Mark Katz
  • Jonathan Sussman
  • Melissa Brouwers
Review Article

Abstract

Goal of Work

The goal of this work was to identify methods of clinician–patient cancer-related communication that may impact patient outcomes associated with distress at critical points in the course of cancer care.

Materials and methods

A systematic review of practice guidelines, systematic reviews, or randomized trials on this topic was conducted. Guidelines for quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument, and the contributive value for recommendations was assessed. Systematic reviews and randomized trials were also evaluated for methodological rigor.

Results

Four existing guidelines, eight systematic reviews and nine randomized trials were identified. Two of the guidelines were of high quality, and all systematic reviews reported clear search criteria and support for their conclusions; the randomized trials were of modest or low quality. For all situations and disease stages, guidelines consistently identified open, honest, and timely communication as important; specifically, there was evidence for a reduction in anxiety when discussions of life expectancy and prognosis were included in consultations. Techniques to increase patient participation in decision-making were associated with greater satisfaction but did not necessarily decrease distress. Few studies took cultural and religious diversity into account.

Conclusions

There is little definitive evidence supporting the superiority of one specific method for communicating information compared to another. Evidence regarding the benefit of decision aids or other strategies to facilitate better communication is inconsistent. Since patients vary in their communication preferences and desire for active participation in decision making, there is a need to individualize communication style.

Keywords

Practice guideline Systematic review Cancer Communication Relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Stephanie Dziengo for confirming the accuracy of the extracted data and rating the guidelines.

References

  1. 1.
    The AGREE Collaboration (2001) Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument (monograph on the Internet). http://www.agreecollaboration.org. Cited 6 Dec 2006
  2. 2.
    Browman GP, Levine MN, Mohide EA, Hayward RS, Pritchard KI, Gafni A et al (1995) The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol 13(2):502–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown RF, Butow PN, Sharrock MA, Henman M, Boyle F, Goldstein D et al (2004) Education and role modeling for clinical decisions with female cancer patients. Health Expect 7(4):303–316 doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00294.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butow P, Devine R, Boyer M, Pendlebury S, Jackson M, Tattersall MH (2004) Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4401–4409 doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.66.155 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Devine RJ, Simpson JM, Aggarwal G et al (2007) Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol 25(6):715–723 doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7827 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies E, Higginson IJ (2003) Communication, information and support for adults with malignant cerebral glioma: a systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer 11(2):21–29 doi:10.1007/b97840 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deadman JM, Leinster SJ, Owens RG, Dewey ME, Slade PD (2001) Taking responsibility for cancer treatment. Soc Sci Med 53(5):669–677 doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00369-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Boyer MJ, Findlow R et al (2000) Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred tactics. Psychooncology 9(2):147–156 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<147::AID-PON443>3.0.CO;2-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fogarty LA, Curbow BA, Wingard JR, McDonnell K, Somerfield MR (1999) Can 40 seconds of compassion reduce patient anxiety? J Clin Oncol 17(1):371–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaston CM, Mitchell G (2005) Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61(10):2252–2264 doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffin JP, Nelson JE, Koch KA, Niell HB, Ackerman TF, Thompson M et al (2003) End-of-life care in patients with lung cancer. Chest 123(1 Suppl):312S–331S doi:10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.312S PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Dimitry S, Tattersall MH (2005) Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol 16(7):1005–1053 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi211 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, Dabrowski M, Dudley MM, Fleishman S et al (2007) Distress management: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:66–98Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kruijver IPM, Garssen B, Visser AP, Kuiper AJ (2006) Signalising psychosocial problems in cancer care: the structural use of a short psychosocial checklist during medical or nursing visits. Patient Educ Couns 62:163–177 doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J (2001) Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 23(3):227–234 doi:10.1093/pubmed/23.3.227 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Breast Cancer Centre (2000) Psychosocial clinical practice guidelines: information, support and counselling for women with breast cancer [monograph on the Internet]. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/. Cited 06 Dec 2006
  17. 17.
    National Breast Cancer Centre, National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Camperdown (Australia): National Health and Medical Research Council. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au. Cited 24 July 2006
  18. 18.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. http://www.nice.org.uk. Cited 24 July 2006
  19. 19.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: research evidence. http://www.nice.org.uk. Cited 24 July 2006
  20. 20.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual. http://www.nice.org.uk. Cited 24 July 2006
  21. 21.
    Schofield P, Carey M, Love A, Nehill C, Wein S (2006) ‘Would you like to talk about your future treatment options?’ Discussing the transition from curative cancer treatment to palliative care. Palliat Med 20(4):397–406 doi:10.1191/0269216306pm1156oa PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scott JT, Harmsen M, Prictor MJ, Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt I (2003) Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art No CD001539. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001539
  23. 23.
    Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, Maguire P, Lipkin M, Novack D et al (1991) Doctor–patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ 303(6814):1385–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stewart MA (1996) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 152:1423–1433Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strasser F, Palmer JL, Willey J, Shen L, Shin K, Sivesind D et al (2005) Impact of physician sitting versus standing during inpatient oncology consultations: patients’ preference and perception of compassion and duration. A randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 29(5):489–497 doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Turner J, Zapart S, Pedersen K, Rankin N, Luxford K, Fletcher J et al (2005) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Psychooncology 14(3):159–173 doi:10.1002/pon.897 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK (2007) Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol 25(9):1067–1073 doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5472 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walker MS, Podbilewicz-Schuller Y (2005) Video preparation for breast cancer treatment planning: results of a randomized clinical trial. Psychooncology 14(5):408–420 doi:10.1002/pon.858 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whelan TM, O’Brien MA, Villasis-Keever M, Robinson P, Skye A, Gafni A et al (2002) Impact of cancer-related decision aids. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No: 46 (Prepared by McMaster University under contract no 290-97-0017) AHRQ Publication No. 02-E004. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, Gafni A, Reyno L, Willan A et al (2003) Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(8):581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Rodin
    • 1
  • Jean A. Mackay
    • 2
  • Camilla Zimmermann
    • 3
  • Carole Mayer
    • 4
  • Doris Howell
    • 5
  • Mark Katz
    • 6
  • Jonathan Sussman
    • 7
  • Melissa Brouwers
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative CarePrincess Margaret Hospital, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Health Information Research Unit, Faculty of Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Palliative Care ServicesPrincess Margaret Hospital, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Supportive Care Program, Supportive Care Oncology Research Unit & Sudbury Genetic Counselling ServicesRegional Cancer Program of the Hôpital/ Régional de Sudbury Regional HospitalSudburyCanada
  5. 5.Oncology Nursing ResearchPrincess Margaret Hospital, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Southlake Regional Health CentreNewmarketCanada
  7. 7.Supportive Cancer Care Research UnitMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  8. 8.McMaster University/Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based CareHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations