Effects of nutritional and psychological status of the patients with advanced stomach cancer on physical performance status
- 246 Downloads
Goals of the work
The aim of this study was to assess the associations between coping mode, nutritional status, and psychological status and performance status of the patients with advanced stomach cancer.
Materials and methods
An epidemiological survey was conducted among 233 patients with advanced stomach cancer in Fujian, China. In-person interviews were performed for the participants with respect to information of psychological status prior to chemotherapy, nutritional status during chemotherapy, and physical performance status after chemotherapy.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the level of hemoglobin (HB), level of daily calorie intake, score of Depression Status Inventory (DSI), and score of confrontation subscale of Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire had a significant influence on performance status (P < 0.05). The relative risks (95% confidence interval) were 2.06 (1.12–3.79) for low level of hemoglobin versus normal level of hemoglobin, 1.16 (1.02–1.32) for low level of daily calorie intake versus normal level of daily calorie intake, 5.89 (2.00–17.31) for DSI score ≥40 versus DSI score <40, and 3.17 (1.73–5.78) for low score of confrontation versus high score of confrontation, respectively.
Depression, low score of “Confrontation”, low levels of HB, and low level of daily calorie intake may be the risk factors of poor performance status of the patients with advanced stomach cancer.
KeywordsNutritional status Psychological status Performance status Stomach cancer Epidemiological survey
- 7.Burrows J, Lammersfeld C, Dahlk S et al (2004) Impact of self-reported performance status on survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(14S):3761–3762Google Scholar
- 9.Cella DF, Orofiamma B, Holland JC et al (1987) The relationship of psychological distress, extent of disease, and performance status in patients with lung cancer. Cancer 60(7):1661–1667. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19871001)60:7<1661::AID-CNCR2820600740>3.0.CO;2-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Guo HW (2002) Medical nutrition. Fudan University Press, Shanghai, pp 2–68Google Scholar
- 15.Maltoni M, Pirovano M, Scarpi E et al (1995) Prediction of survival of patients terminally ill with cancer: results of an Italian prospective multicentric study. Cancer 75:2613–2622. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2613::AID-CNCR2820751032>3.0.CO;2-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Boeck A Hinke S, Wilkowski R, Heinemann V (2007) Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13(2):224–227Google Scholar
- 26.Wan GJ, Counte MA, Cella DF (1996) The relationship between performance status, socio-cultural factors and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. AHSR FHSR Annu Meet Abstr Book 13:197–198Google Scholar
- 27.Wang XD, Wang XL, Ma Hong (1999) Rating scales for mental health. Zhongguo xingli Weisheng Zazhi PressGoogle Scholar
- 29.Zhao ZT (2000) Methods and application in epidemiologic research. Kexue, Beijing, pp 319–326Google Scholar
- 31.Zung WWK (1976) Depression status inventory and self-rating depression scale. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. William GuyGoogle Scholar