Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 727–734 | Cite as

Indicators of surgery and survival in oncology inpatients requiring surgical evaluation for palliation

  • Brian D. Badgwell
  • Kerrington Smith
  • Ping Liu
  • Eduardo Bruera
  • Steven A. Curley
  • Janice N. Cormier
Original Article

Abstract

Background

We sought to determine the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes associated with surgical consultation for symptom palliation in oncology inpatients.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the medical records of inpatients for whom surgical consultations were requested (January 2000 to September 2006) at a tertiary referral cancer center to identify those who underwent surgical palliative evaluation (defined as consultation for symptoms attributable to an advanced or incurable malignancy). We used the Cox proportional hazards model to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and logistic regression to identify factors associated with surgical intervention.

Results

Surgical consultation was requested for 1,102 inpatients; 442 (40%) met the criteria for surgical palliative evaluation. Gastrointestinal obstruction was the most common complaint (43%), while wound complications/infection and gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 10% and 8%, respectively. The median OS was 2.9 months. Adverse prognostic factors for OS included ≥2 radiologically evident disease sites (HR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.8) and carcinomatosis/sarcomatosis (HR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.7). Palliative surgical procedures were performed in 119 (27%) patients, with a 90-day morbidity and mortality rate of 40% and 7% respectively. Patients with wound complications (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4–7.6), intestinal obstruction (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1–3.2), or an intact primary/recurrent tumor (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2–6.0) were more likely to undergo surgical intervention. Patients with ascites were less likely to undergo surgery (OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2–0.8).

Conclusions

Surgical palliative evaluations accounted for 40% of inpatient surgical consultations. Given that OS in this population is short and surgery is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, non-operative management is desirable.

Keywords

Palliative care Surgery Surgical oncology Morbidity Mortality 

References

  1. 1.
    A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291402
  2. 2.
    American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer facts and figures 2007. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization (2002) National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox D (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feuer DJ, Broadley KE, Shepherd JH et al (1999) Systematic review of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynecological and gastrointestinal cancer. The Systematic Review Steering Committee. Gynecol Oncol 75:313–322. doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5594 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gripp S, Moeller S, Bolke E et al (2007) Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression. J Clin Oncol 25:3313–3320. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5411 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481. doi:10.2307/2281868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krebs HB, Goplerud DR (1983) Surgical management of bowel obstruction in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 61:327–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krouse RS, Nelson RA, Farrell BR et al (2001) Surgical palliation at a cancer center: incidence and outcomes. Arch Surg 136:773–778. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.7.773 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Legendre H, Vanhuyse F, Caroli-Bosc FX et al (2001) Survival and quality of life after palliative surgery for neoplastic gastrointestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:364–367. doi:10.1053/ejso.2001.1120 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCahill LE (2004) Methodology for scientific evaluation of palliative surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 13:413–427. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2004.03.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCahill LE, Dunn GP, Mosenthal AC et al (2004) Palliation as a core surgical principle: part 1. J Am Coll Surg 199:149–160. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCahill LE, Krouse R, Chu D et al (2002) Indications and use of palliative surgery—results of Society of Surgical Oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol 9:104–112. doi:10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.104 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCahill LE, Krouse RS, Chu DZ et al (2002) Decision making in palliative surgery. J Am Coll Surg 195:411–422. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01306-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCahill LE, Smith DD, Borneman T et al (2003) A prospective evaluation of palliative outcomes for surgery of advanced malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 10:654–663. doi:10.1245/ASO.2003.06.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miner TJ (2005) Palliative surgery for advanced cancer: lessons learned in patient selection and outcome assessment. Am J Clin Oncol 28:411–414. doi:10.1097/01.coc.0000158489.82482.2b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miner TJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2004) A prospective, symptom related, outcomes analysis of 1022 palliative procedures for advanced cancer. Ann Surg 240:719–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miner TJ, Jaques DP, Karpeh MS et al (2004) Defining palliative surgery in patients receiving noncurative resections for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 198:1013–1021. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.02.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Podnos YD, Juarez G, Pameijer C et al (2007) Impact of surgical palliation on quality of life in patients with advanced malignancy: results of the decisions and outcomes in palliative surgery (DOPS) trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14:922–928. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9238-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Podnos YD, Juarez G, Pameijer C et al (2007) Surgical palliation of advanced gastrointestinal tumors. J Palliat Med 10:871–876. doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.0174 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turnbull AD, Guerra J, Starnes HF (1989) Results of surgery for obstructing carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal, pancreatic, or biliary origin. J Clin Oncol 7:381–386PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian D. Badgwell
    • 1
  • Kerrington Smith
    • 2
  • Ping Liu
    • 3
  • Eduardo Bruera
    • 4
  • Steven A. Curley
    • 2
  • Janice N. Cormier
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer InstituteUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgical Oncology, Unit 444The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics and Applied MathematicsThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  4. 4.The Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation MedicineThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations