A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care
- 769 Downloads
Goals of work
The study purpose was to evaluate a nurse-led supportive care clinical case management program in the community using multi-methods to delineate care processes prior to outcome evaluation.
Materials and methods
Multiple data sources including program service records, chart reviews and interviews with nurses and key interdisciplinary informants were used to identify population served (coverage and reach), processes of care (implementation), and providers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the nurse-led program (reaction).
The program provided care to over 700 cancer patients in a 1-year period. Nurse-led support interventions were focused on direct care inclusive of teaching/coaching for symptom management, counseling and support, and mobilization of services through system navigation based on an initial comprehensive assessment of supportive care needs.
Nurse-led models of supportive care have the potential to reduce unmet supportive care needs, improve continuity of care, and overall health-related quality of life that should be tested in future trials.
KeywordsSupportive care Community Evaluation Nursing Case management
This research was supported by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care in Ontario, Canada through the Supportive Care Research Unit, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario. We also acknowledge the time provided by the ICCN nurses and other participants who contributed to our understanding of the ICCN model of care.
- 1.Fitch M (2003) Supportive care: rebalancing efforts. In: Sullivan T, Evans W, Angus H, Hudson A (eds) Strengthening the quality of cancer services in Ontario. Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto Ontario, pp 141–163Google Scholar
- 4.Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) (2003) The needs of Ontario cancer patients: an assessment. Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), TorontGoogle Scholar
- 5.Jacobson PB, Donavan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. American Cancer Society. Published online February 2005 in Wiley Interscience (http://www.interscience.wiley.com)
- 8.Fitch M (1994) Provincial Cancer Network Supportive Care Work Group: report and recommendations, Submission to Cancer Care Ontario: TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 9.Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (2001) Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control Draft Synthesis, Report 10. Ottawa, ON. CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Brazil K, Whelan T, O’Brien MA, Sussman J, Pyette N, Bainbridge D et al (2003). Coordinating supportive care in the community. Prepared for the Research Divisions, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareGoogle Scholar
- 11.Provincial Cancer Network Committee (1995) Recommendations on cancer care in Ontario. Submitted to Ontario Ministry of Health. Provincial Cancer Network Committee, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Whelan T, Grunfeld E, Sussman J, Abelson J, Willan A, Selleck S et al (2003) An evaluation of continuity of cancer care through Regional Supportive Care Networks. Canadian Health Services Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
- 15.Farber JM, Deschamps M, Cameron R (2002) Investigation and Assessment of the Navigator Role in Meeting the Informational Needs of Women with Breast Cancer in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada 2002Google Scholar
- 16.Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CANO/ACIO) (2001) Standards of care, roles in oncology nursing and role competencies. Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CANO/ACIO), TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sussman J, Howell D, O’Brien MA, Whelan T (2004) An evaluation of the effectiveness of a specialized nurse case management model in coordinating supportive cancer care in the community. Submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, May 14, 2004Google Scholar
- 21.Bunn F (1988) An explanatory study of the role of the Macmillan nurse. King’s College, University of London (unpublished study)Google Scholar
- 23.Rossi PH, Freeman HE (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach, 5th edn. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 25.Norusis MJ (2002) SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
- 26.Neuendorf KA (2001) The content analysis handbook. Cleveland State University, Cleveland, USAGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA:Google Scholar
- 28.Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 30.Alter C, Murty S (1997) Logic modeling: a tool for teaching critical thinking in social work practice. J Soc Work Educ 33:85–102Google Scholar
- 31.Skarstein J, Aass N, Fossa SD, Skovland E, Dahl AA (2000) Anxiety and depression in cancer patients: relation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 49:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Canadian Cancer Control Strategy, ReBalance Focus Action Group Mission and Mandate, Public Health Agency of Canada, 2005Google Scholar
- 36.Hollander M, Prince M (2002) The third way: a framework for organizing health related services for individuals with ongoing care needs and their families. Home Care and Pharmaceutical Division, Health Policy and Communications Branch, Health Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 42.McCorkle R, Strumpf NE, Nuamah IF, Adler DC, Cooley ME, Jepson C et al (2000) A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1701–1713Google Scholar