Laetrile for cancer: a systematic review of the clinical evidence
- 2.5k Downloads
Many cancer patients treated with conventional therapies also try ‘alternative’ cancer treatments. Laetrile is one such ‘alternative’ that is claimed to be effective by many alternative therapists. Laetrile is also sometimes referred to as amygdalin, although the two are not the same.
The aim of this review is to summarize all types of clinical data related to the effectiveness or safety of laetrile interventions as a treatment of any type of cancer.
Materials and methods
All types of clinical studies containing original clinical data of laetrile interventions were included. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1951), EMBASE (from 1980), Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Scirus, CancerLit, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL; all from 1982), CAMbase (from 1998), the MetaRegister, the National Research Register, and our own files. For reports on the safety of laetrile, we also searched the Uppsala database. No language restrictions were imposed.
Thirty six reports met our inclusion criteria. No controlled clinical trials were found. Three articles were nonconsecutive case series, 2 were consecutive case series, 6 were best case series, and 25 were case reports. None of these publications proved the effectiveness of laetrile.
Therefore, the claim that laetrile has beneficial effects for cancer patients is not supported by sound clinical data.
KeywordsLaetrile Amygdalin Cancer Systematic review
The authors thank Katja Schmidt for her valuable support and the European Commission for having funded the CAM-Cancer project within its fifth framework program.
- 4.Gibbs M (2004) Networking topics for palliative care. Pharm J 273(7320):539Google Scholar
- 9.Jean Bruneton (1999) Pharmacognosy, 2nd edn. Intercept, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gurib-Fakim A, Brendler T (2004) Medicinal and aromatic plants of Indian Ocean islands. Medpharm, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 12.Turczan JW, Medwick T, Plank W (1978) Cyanogenetic glycosides. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 61:192–207Google Scholar
- 17.David Shaffer (1979) The Associated Press (July 16)Google Scholar
- 18.Michael Putzel (1979) The Associated Press (June 19)Google Scholar
- 19.23 states have passed laetrile legislation (1980) The Associated Press (December 21)Google Scholar
- 21.Meijer EL (2001) Sale over the Internet of substances for human consumption which are regarded as harmful in America. Off J (2001/C 151 E/071)Google Scholar
- 22.Questionable cancer practices in Tijuana and other Mexican border clinics (1991). CA Cancer J Clin 41(5):310–319Google Scholar
- 28.Manner HW, Di Santi SJ, Maggio MI (1978) Amygdalin, vitamin A and enzyme induced regression of murine mammary adenocarcinomas. J Manip Physiol Ther 1(4):246–248Google Scholar
- 29.Bhatti RA, Ablin RJ, Guinan PD (1981) Tumour-associated directed immunity in prostatic cancer: effect of amygdalin. IRCS Med Sci Clin Biochem 9(1):19Google Scholar
- 32.Milazzo S, Ernst E, Lejeune S, Schmidt K (2006) Laetrile treatment for cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, Art. No.: CD005476Google Scholar
- 37.Treatment of cancer with laetriles; a report by the Cancer Commission of the California Medical Association (1953). Calif Med 78(4):320–326 (Apr)Google Scholar
- 38.Guidetti Hector (1955) Observations preliminaries sur quelques cas de cancer traits par un glycuronosyde cyanogenetique. Acta XI(2):156–158Google Scholar
- 41.Navarro MD (1964) Laetrile therapy in cancer. Acta Unio Contra Cancrum 20:392–394Google Scholar
- 43.Morrone JA (1962) Chemotherapy of inoperable cancer: preliminary report of 10 cases treated with laetrile. Exp Med Surg 20:299–308Google Scholar
- 44.Helvie CO, Cayce CT (1997) Alternative treatment for lung cancer and irregular heartbeat: two case studies. Alternate Health Pract 3(3):185–194Google Scholar
- 45.Quackery PP (1992) South Med J 85(2):1264Google Scholar
- 47.Perspective: resolving an ethical dilemma (1980). Nursing 10(5):39–43Google Scholar
- 51.Reactions to “laetrilomania” (1977). N Engl J Med 297(4):218–221 (Jul 28)Google Scholar
- 53.Leor R, Michaeli J, Brezis M, Stessman J (1986) Laetrile intoxication and hepatic necrosis: a possible association. South J Med 79(2):259–260 (Feb)Google Scholar
- 63.Ortega JA, Creek JE (1978) Acute cyanide poisoning following administration of laetrile enemas. J Pediatr (6):1059 (Dec)Google Scholar
- 66.Navarro MD (1955) Metastatic pulmonary carcinoma treated with laetrile. Unitas 28:606–618Google Scholar
- 74.Krebs ET Jr, Krebs ET Sr, Beard HH (1950) The unitarian or trophoblastic thesis of cancer. Med Rec 163(7):149–174Google Scholar
- 78.Krebs ET Jr (1970) The nitrilosides (vitamin B17)—their nature, occurrence and metabolic significance antineoplastic vitamin B17. J Appl Nutr 22:75–86Google Scholar